The study was aimed at (a) exploring the anomalies in conceptualising and measuring work, especially that of the women, (b) analysing the patterns of unpaid work distribution between men and women, and (c) examining the drivers of time spent on unpaid work in India. It has been argued that the under-conceptualisation of work and the methodological constraints led to invisibilising several activities, mostly performed by girls and women, in the prevailing labour force statistics and national income accountings. We have noted that such anomalies could be overcome with the advancement of robust statistical tools like that of time use survey. By employing the first and the most recent pan time use survey, conducted by the National Sample Survey Organization across the country in 2019, we have assessed the gender patterns of unpaid work and its determinants. We found the existence of a stark gender gap both in terms of participation and average time spent on unpaid work across rural and urban regions. Again, the findings, obtained through the Tobit regression model, reveal that the nature of the association and the extent of time allocated to unpaid work vary substantially across the demographic and socio-economic characteristics.
BudlenderD. (2010). Time use studies and unpaid care work. Routledge.
9.
BudlenderD., & MpetsheniY. (1999, October). Dealing with diversity: Measuring time use in South Africa. Conference of the International Association of Time Use Research.
10.
Dalla CostaM., & JamesS. (1975). The power of women and the subversion of the community(IMF Working Paper WP/15/55). Asia and Pacific Department.
11.
DandekarV. M.(1982). Integration of women in economic development. Economic & Political Weekly, 17(44), 1782–1786.
12.
DeshpandeA., & KabeerN. (2021). Norms that matter: Exploring the distribution of women’s work between income generation, expenditure-saving, and unpaid domestic responsibilities in India(WIDER Working Paper, 2021/130).
13.
FloroM. S. (2021). Time allocation and time-use surveys. The Routledge handbook of feminist economics (pp. 148–156). Routledge.
14.
FloroM. S., & MilesM. (2003). Time use, work and overlapping activities: Evidence from Australia. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(6), 881–904.
15.
FolbreN., & YoonJ.(2008). Economic development and time devoted to direct unpaid care activities(UNRISD Flagship Report on Poverty). United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
16.
GardinerJ., HimmelweitS., & MackintoshM. (1975). Women’s domestic labor. New Left Review, 89(1), 47–58.
17.
GhoshJ. (2020). Time poverty and women’s work. InJhaP., KumarA., & MishraY.(Eds.), Labouring women: Issues and challenges in contemporary India. Orient Blackswan.
18.
GhoshJ. (2021). The interlinkages between paid and unpaid labour: A homage to Krishna Bharadwaj. The Indian Economic Journal, 69(2), 338–351.
19.
HaraldsenG. (1999, October). The design of time use surveys in developed and developing countries. Conference of the International Association for Time Use Research, Colchester (pp. 6–8).
20.
HarrisonJ. (1973). The political economy of housework. Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economists, 3(1), 35–52.
21.
HirwayI. (1999, December). Time use studies: Conceptual and methodological issues with reference to the Indian time use survey. International Seminar on Time Use Studies, Ahmedabad, India.
22.
HirwayI. (2010). Estimating workforce using time use statistics in India and its implications for employment policies. InAntonopoulosR. & HirwayI.(Eds.), Unpaid work and the economy: Gender, time use and poverty in the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.
23.
ILO. (2013October2–11). Revision of the International Classification of Status in International Conference of Labour Statisticians Employment (ICSE-93). ILO Department of Statistics.
24.
KabeerN. (2012). Women’s economic empowerment and inclusive growth: Labour markets and enterprise development. International Development Research Centre, 44(10), 1–70.
25.
KalenkoskiC. M., RibarD. C., & StrattonL. S. (2005). Parental child care in single-parent, cohabiting, and married-couple families: Time-diary evidence from the United Kingdom. American Economic Review, 95(2), 194–198.
26.
KimmelJ., & ConnellyR. (2007). Mothers’ time choices: Caregiving, leisure, home production, and paid work. Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 643–681.
27.
KuznetsS. (1948). National income: A new version. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 30(3), 151–179.
28.
MehrotraS., & SinhaS. (2017). Explaining falling female employment during a high growth period. Economic & Political Weekly, L11(39), 54–62.
29.
MincerJ. (1962). Labor force participation of married women: A study of labor supply. In Aspects of labor economics (pp. 63–105). Princeton University Press.
30.
NeethaN. (2020). Exploring paid and unpaid work dichotomy: A care-employment perspective. In JhaP., KumarA., & MishraY. (Eds.), Labouring women: Issues and challenges in contemporary India. Orient Blackswan.
31.
NSSO (2019). Time use survey 2019: Design, concepts, definitions and procedures (Vol. 1). MOSPI, GOI.
32.
OakleyA. (1974). Housewife. Martin Robertson Penguin.
33.
SamantroyE. (2020). Women’s participation in domestic duties and paid employment in India: The missing links. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(2), 437–457.
34.
SinghP., & PattanaikF. (2019). Economic status of women in India: paradox of paid–unpaid work and poverty. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(3), 410–428.
35.
SinghP., & PattanaikF. (2020). Unfolding unpaid domestic work in India: women’s constraints, choices, and career. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–13.
36.
ThoratS. K., & Mallick (2004). Labour and occupation discrimination in rural area (Working Paper). Indian Institute of Dalit Studies, New Delhi.
