The present study empirically examines the bi-directional relationship between sustainability disclosures and earnings quality under mandatory sustainability disclosures regime for India, a developing country. It considers both the qualitative and quantitative measurements of sustainability disclosures. Earlier research only explored such relationships assuming a unidirectional approach, under voluntary sustainability disclosure setting with quantitative measurements of sustainability disclosures for developed countries. The study employs the generalised method of moments (GMM) approach on selected listed companies for the period 2013–2019. The result shows a negative bi-directional relationship between sustainability disclosures quality and earnings quality which also hold when tested with an alternate earnings quality measure. The result confirms that firms focusing on sustainability disclosures will also be manipulating earnings because of opportunistic perspective. Also, firms manage earnings to use sustainability disclosures as their cover to protect themselves. The study offers theoretical contribution by empirically corroborating the agency theory based managerial opportunism hypothesis. It extends and validates the managerial opportunism hypothesis in a novel context and under mandatory sustainability disclosures setting. The findings offer strong policy implications to Indian regulators and other stakeholders regarding the unintended consequence of mandatory sustainability disclosures.
AlipourM., GhanbariM., JamshidinavidB., & TaherabadiA. (2019). The relationship between environmental disclosure quality and earnings quality: A panel study of an emerging market. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(2), 326–347.
2.
AlmahrogY., Ali AribiZ., & ArunT. (2018). Earnings management and corporate social responsibility: UK evidence. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 16(2), 311–332.
3.
AmiduM., KwakyeT. O., HarveyS., & YorkeM. S. (2016). Do firms manage earnings and avoid tax for corporate social responsibility?Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 8(2), 11–27.
BaltagiB. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley.
6.
BartovE., GulF. A., & TsuiJ. S. (2001). Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 421–452.
7.
BerettaS., & BozzolanS. (2004). A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting, 39(3), 265–288.
8.
BerettaS., & BozzolanS. (2008). Quality versus quantity: The case of forward-looking disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(3), 333–376.
9.
BlackL. D., & HärtelC. E. (2004). The five capabilities of socially responsible companies. Journal of Public Affairs: An International Journal, 4(2), 125–144.
10.
BlundellR., & BondS. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
11.
BozzolanS., FabriziM., MallinC. A., & MichelonG. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and earnings quality: International evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 50(4), 361–396.
12.
BrahmanaR. K., TanM. Y., & YouH. W. (2018). Corporate environmental disclosure and earning management. International Journal of Green Economics, 12(3–4), 308–321.
13.
CarnegieG. D., & NapierC. J. (2010). Traditional accountants and business professionals: Portraying the accounting profession after Enron. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(3), 360–376.
14.
ChanS., WeitzN., PerssonÅ., & TrimmerC. (2018). SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production. A Review of Research Needs (pp. 1–25). Stockholm Environment Institute.
15.
ChenK. Y., ElderR. J., & HsiehY. M. (2007). Corporate governance and earnings management: The implications of corporate governance best-practice principles for Taiwanese listed companies. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 3(2), 73–105.
16.
ChenR. C., & HungS. W. (2021). Exploring the impact of corporate social responsibility on real earning management and discretionary accruals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 333–351.
17.
ChihH. L., ShenC. H., & KangF. C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and earnings management: Some international evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1), 179–198.
18.
ChoiT. H., & PaeJ. (2011). Business ethics and financial reporting quality: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 403–427.
19.
ChristensenH. B., HailL., & LeuzC. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248.
20.
DawkinsC. E., & FraasJ. W. (2011). Erratum to: Beyond acclamations and excuses: Environmental performance, voluntary environmental disclosure and the role of visibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 383–397.
21.
DechowP., GeW., & SchrandC. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401.
22.
DechowP. M., SloanR. G., & SweeneyA. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review, 50(2), 193–225.
23.
DengL., LiS., & LiaoM. (2017). Dividends and earnings quality: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 48, 255–268.
24.
DingR., LiuM., WangT., & WuZ. (2021). The impact of climate risk on earnings management: International evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(2), 106818.
25.
EhsanS., TariqA., NazirM. S., ShabbirM. S., ShabbirR., LopezL. B., & UllahW. (2021). Nexus between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Sustainable or opportunistic. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(2), 478–495.
26.
FaisalF., PrasetyaA. R., ChaririA., & HaryantoH. (2018). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and earnings management: Is it a complement mechanism or a substitute mechanism?International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 13(1), 1–14.
27.
GaoL., & ZhangJ. H. (2015). Firms’ earnings smoothing, corporate social responsibility, and valuation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 108–127.
28.
GattiL., VishwanathB., SeeleP., & CottierB. (2019). Are we moving beyond voluntary CSR? Exploring theoretical and managerial implications of mandatory CSR resulting from the new Indian companies act. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 961–972.
29.
GergedA. M., AlbitarK., & Al‐HaddadL. (2021). Corporate environmental disclosure and earnings management—The moderating role of corporate governance structures. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1–22. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijfe.2564
30.
GoelP. (2018). Rising standards of sustainability reporting in India: A study of impact of reforms in disclosure norms on corporate performance. Journal of Indian Business Research, 13(1), 92–109.
31.
Gras-GilE., ManzanoM. P., & FernándezJ. H. (2016). Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Evidence from Spain. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(4), 289–299.
32.
GrimaldiF., CaragnanoA., ZitoM., & MarianiM. (2020). Sustainability engagement and earnings management: The Italian context. Sustainability, 12(12), 4881.
33.
HelfayaA., WhittingtonM., & AlawattageC. (2018). Exploring the quality of corporate environmental reporting: Surveying preparers’ and users’ perceptions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 163–193.
34.
HemingwayC. A., & MaclaganP. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.
35.
HuttonA. P., MillerG. S., & SkinnerD. J. (2003). The role of supplementary statements with management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(5), 867–890.
36.
IdowuS. O., & TowlerB. A. (2004). A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), 420–437.
37.
IoannouI., & SerafeimG. (2017). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting(Research Working Paper, 11–100). Harvard Business School.
38.
JainA., KansalM., & JoshiM. (2021). New development: Corporate philanthropy to mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR)—A new law for India. Public Money & Management, 41(3), 276–278.
39.
JonesJ. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228.
40.
JonesK. L., KrishnanG. V., & MelendrezK. D. (2008). Do models of discretionary accruals detect actual cases of fraudulent and restated earnings? An empirical analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 499–531.
41.
JordaanL. A., De KlerkM., & de VilliersC. J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and earnings management of South African companies. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), 1–13.
42.
JoseP. D., & SarafS. (2013). Corporate sustainability initiatives reporting: A study of India’s most valuable companies(Research Paper, 428). IIM Bangalore.
43.
KimY., ParkM. S., & WierB. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility?The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761–796.
44.
KochC., & SchmidtC. (2010). Disclosing conflicts of interest–Do experience and reputation matter?Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 95–107.
45.
KönigsgruberR. (2009). An economic analysis of cross-listing decisions and their impact on earnings quality. Schmalenbach Business Review, 61(3), 310–330.
46.
KothariS. P., LeoneA. J., & WasleyC. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197.
47.
LaksmiA. C., & KamilaZ. (2018). The effect of good corporate governance and earnings management to corporate social responsibility disclosure. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(1), 1–16.
48.
LauxC., & LeuzC. (2009). The crisis of fair-value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 826–834.
49.
LoS. F., & SheuH. J. (2007). Is corporate sustainability a value‐increasing strategy for business?Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 345–358.
50.
LuY., AbeysekeraI., & CorteseC. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting quality, board characteristics and corporate social reputation: Evidence from China. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(1), 95–118.
51.
Martínez‐FerreroJ., Gallego‐ÁlvarezI., & García‐SánchezI. M. (2015). A bidirectional analysis of earnings management and corporate social responsibility: The moderating effect of stakeholder and investor protection. Australian Accounting Review, 25(4), 359–371.
52.
MichelonG., PilonatoS., & RicceriF. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78.
53.
MionG., & Loza AdauiC. R. (2019). Mandatory nonfinancial disclosure and its consequences on the sustainability reporting quality of Italian and German companies. Sustainability, 11(17), 4612.
54.
MoratisL., & van EgmondM. (2018). Concealing social responsibility? Investigating the relationship between CSR, earnings management and the effect of industry through quantitative analysis. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 8.
55.
MuttakinM. B., KhanA., & AzimM. I. (2015). Corporate social responsibility disclosures and earnings quality: Are they a reflection of managers’ opportunistic behavior?Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(3), 278–296.
56.
NairR., MuttakinM., KhanA., SubramaniamN., & SomanathV. S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial transparency: Evidence from India. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 56, 330–351.
57.
NarayanaswamyR., RaghunandanK., & RamaD. V. (2012). Corporate governance in the Indian context. Accounting Horizons, 26(3), 583–599.
58.
O’DonovanG. (2000). Legitimacy theory as an explanation for corporate environmental disclosures(Doctoral dissertation, pp. 49–80). Victoria University of Technology.
59.
PriorD., SurrocaJ., & TribóJ. A. (2008). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 160–177.
60.
RaithathaM., & ShawT. S. (2021). Firm’s tax aggressiveness under mandatory CSR regime: Evidence after mandatory CSR regulation of India. International Review of Finance, 1–9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irfi.12348
61.
RezaeeZ. (2016). Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature, 36, 48–64.
62.
RezaeeZ., & TuoL. (2019). Are the quantity and quality of sustainability disclosures associated with the innate and discretionary earnings quality?Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 763–786.
63.
RoodmanD. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
64.
SachsJ., KrollC., LafortuneG., FullerG., & WoelmF. (2021). Sustainable development report 2021. Cambridge University Press.
65.
SalewskiM., & ZülchH. (2014, January7). The association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and earnings quality—Evidence from European Blue Chips(HHL Working Paper Series No. 112). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2141768
66.
SastryT. (2011). Exploring the role of business in society. IIMB Management Review, 23(4), 246–256.
67.
ScholtensB., & KangF. C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Evidence from Asian economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2), 95–112.
68.
ShawT. S., RaithathaM., KrishnanG. V., & CordeiroJ. J. (2021). Did mandatory CSR compliance impact accounting conservatism? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 17(3), 100280.
UllahS., AkhtarP., & ZaefarianG. (2018). Dealing with endogeneity bias: The generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 69–78.
71.
VelayuthamE. (2018). Sustainability disclosure and earnings management. In BoubakerS., CummingD., & NguyenD. K. (Eds.), Research handbook of finance and sustainability (pp. 532–549). University of Southern Queensland.
72.
VelteP. (2019). The bidirectional relationship between ESG performance and earnings management–Empirical evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 10, 322–338.
73.
VelteP. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: A literature review. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(2), 8–19.
74.
WintokiM. B., LinckJ. S., & NetterJ. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606.
75.
YuH. C., KuoL., & KaoM. F. (2017). The relationship between CSR disclosure and competitive advantage. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(5), 547–570.
