The unorganised manufacturing industries play a vital role in the process of industrial development of the Indian economy. Informal firms are relatively less productive than formal firms, because a majority of the firms are technically inefficient, producing far below the actual attainable level of production. This article examines differences in efficiency and output between formal and informal production firms across India’s manufacturing industries. The key novelty in this article is in studying both the formal and informal sectors simultaneously by applying the technique of Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition to determine efficiency differences across the sectors. The results suggest that capital is a positive and the most significant determinant of the output of efficient industries. Output gaps can be explained by coefficient, endowment and interaction aspects of capital and capital productivity, while efficiency differences are explained by coefficient and interaction characteristics of emoluments and capital productivity. The results of density plots show that informal firms are no longer functioning as a pool of surplus labour in the context of Indian manufacturing industries during these years. The results dispel the notion that the informal sector is a poor performer in terms of total output compared to the formal sector. Also, capital and capital productivity are less in informal manufacturing industries than in the formal sector.
AhluwaliaM. S. (2002). Economic reforms in India since 1991: Has gradualism worked? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 67–88.
2.
AignerD. J., LovellC. A., & SchmidtP. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37.
3.
Báez-MoralesA. (2015). Differences in efficiency between formal and informal micro firms in Mexico(AQR-Working Papers, 2015). IREA.
4.
BatteseG., & CoelliT. (1988). Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 38(3), 387–399.
5.
BattesseG., & CorraG. (1977). Estimation of a production frontier model: With application to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21(3), 167–179.
6.
BeladiH., DuttaM., & KarS. (2016). FDI and business internationalization of the unorganized sector: Evidence from Indian manufacturing. World Development, 83, 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.006
7.
BhaumikS. K., GangopadhyayS., & KrishnanS. (2006). Reforms, entry and productivity: Some evidence from the Indian manufacturing sector(IZA Discussion Paper 2086). Bonn.
8.
BlinderA. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 436–455.
9.
CharlotO., MalherbetF., & TerraC. (2015). Informality in developing economies: Regulation and fiscal policies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 51, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2014.09.031
10.
ChongA., GaldoJ., & SaavedraJ. (2008). Informality and productivity in the labor market in Peru. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 11(4), 229–245.
11.
DarityW.JRGuilkey,D. K., & WinfreyW. (1996). Explaining differences in economic performance among racial and ethnic groups in the USA: The data examined. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 55(4), 411–425.
12.
De MelS., McKenzieD., & WoodruffC. (2013). The demand for, and consequences of, formalization among informal firms in Sri Lanka. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(2), 122–150.
13.
De PaulaA.ScheinkmanJ. A. (2011). The informal sector: An equilibrium model and some empirical evidence from Brazil. Review of Income and Wealth, 57, S8–S26.
14.
De SotoH. (1989). The other path, the invisible revolution in the third world. Harper and Row Publishers.
15.
De SotoH. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. Basic Books.
16.
GhaniE., KerrW., & SeguraA. (2015July13). Rise of informality in India’s tradable manufacturing sector. Ideas for India. https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/macroeconomics/rise-of-informality-in-indias-tradable-manufacturing-sector.html
17.
GreeneW. H. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions. Journal of Econometrics, 13(1), 27–56.
18.
GrossmanJ. B. (1982). The substitutability of natives and immigrants in production. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 596–603.
19.
HartK. (1973). Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 11(1), 61–89.
20.
HartK. (1985). The informal economy. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 10(2), 54–58.
21.
HendyR., & ZakiC. (2013). On informality and productivity of micro and small enterprises: Evidence from MENA countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 19(4), 438–470.
22.
Hernández-TrilloF., PagánJ. A., & PaxtonJ. (2005). Start-up capital, microenterprises and technical efficiency in Mexico. Review of Development Economics, 9(3), 434–447.
23.
JainH. (2019). Wage-productivity relationship in Indian manufacturing industries: Evidences from state-level panel data. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 13(3), 277–305.
24.
JannB. (2008). The Blinder -Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. The Stata Journal, 8(4), 453–479.
25.
KathuriaV. (2010). Does the technology gap influence spillovers? A post-liberalization analysis of Indian manufacturing industries. Oxford Development Studies, 38(2), 145–170.
26.
KimC. (2010). Decomposing the change in the wage gap between White and Black men over time, 1980–2005: An extension of the blinder-oaxaca decomposition method. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(4), 619–651.
27.
La PortaR.ShleiferA. (2008). The unofficial economy and economic development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008, 275–352. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27720402
28.
La PortaR.ShleiferA. (2014). Informality and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 109–126.
29.
LevyS. (2007). Can social programs reduce productivity and growth? A hypothesis for Mexico (Working Paper). International Policy Center (IPC).
30.
LoayzaN. V., & RigoliniJ. (2011). Informal employment: Safety net or growth engine?World Development, 39(9), 1503–1515.
MaloneyW. F. (1999). Does informality imply segmentation in urban labor markets? Evidence from sectoral transitions in Mexico. The World Bank Economic Review, 13(2), 275–302.
33.
MaloneyW. F. (2004). Informality revisited. World Development, 32(7), 1159–1178.
34.
MeeusenW., & Van Den BroeckJ. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435–444.
35.
MwangiT., SimiyuF., BeyeneL. M., & OnderiA. (2017). Minimum wage raises contribute to rural-urban inequality in Kenya.https://media.africaportal.org/documents/MPIA_12838-Kenya-Policy_Brief_web.pdf
36.
NCEUS. (2009). The challenge of employment in India: An informal economy perspective. National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector. Government of India, New Delhi.
37.
OaxacaR. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709.
38.
RauchJ. E. (1991). Modelling the informal sector formally. Journal of Development Economics, 35(1), 33–47.
39.
RBI. (2017). Annual report of the RBI for the year 2016–17. Reserve Bank of India. https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/AnnualReport/PDFs/RBIAR201617_FE1DA2F97D61249B1B21C4EA66250841F.PDF
40.
StanleyT. D., & JarrellS. B. (1998). Gender wage discrimination bias? A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Human Resources, 33(4), 947–973.
41.
StevensonR. E. (1980). Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation. Journal of Econometrics, 13(1), 57–66.
42.
SwaminathanM. (1991). Understanding the ‘informal sector’: A survey (Working Paper). UNU-WIDER.
43.
TyboutR. J. (1997). Trade liberalization and its aftermath. In Roberts MarkJ., & TyboutJ. R. (Eds), Industrial evolution in developing countries: Micro patterns of turnover, productivity and market structures. Oxford University Press.
44.
UlysseaG. (2018). Firms, informality, and development: Theory and evidence from Brazil. American Economic Review, 108(8), 2015–2047.
45.
UnniJ. (2001). Gender and informality in labour market in South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(26), 2360–2377.
46.
WeichselbaumerD., & Winter-EbmerR. (2005). A meta-analysis of the international gender wage gap. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 479–511.
