Many countries are under constant fear that environmental policies might negatively influence the international competitiveness of polluting industries. In this study, we aim to evaluate the relationship and impact of the environmental tax on comparative advantage of trade in food and food products industry, considered to be one of the highly environmentally sensitive industries. This study also investigates, whether this relationship differs among countries covered in G20, with the help of correlation analysis. We select panel autoregressive distributed lag approach for this study as it can analyse long-run as well as short-run association even when the variables are stationary at different orders of integration. Using panel data from G20 countries over the period of 21 years that is from 1994 to 2015, it is concluded that when we allow environmental taxes to interact with the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) of G20 nations, the overall impact of the environmental tax on the RCA is negative in the long period. It is therefore suggested that countries should follow Porter hypothesis to stimulate innovations resulting from strict environmental regulations that affect the environment in least possible manner.
ArnoldF. S. (1999). Environmental protection: Is it bad for the economy?U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
2.
BaltagiB. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BankWorld Ecofys Econom. Vivid (2016). State and trends of carbon pricing. World Bank. 10.1596/978-1-4648-1001-5
4.
BaumolW. J.OatesW. E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BodenT.MarlandG.AndresR. (2011). Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel co2 emissions, 1751–2008 (Version 2011). Environmental System Science Data Infrastructure for a Virtual Ecosystem; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2011
6.
BonnetC.Bouamra-MechemacheZ.CorreT. (2018). An environmental tax towards more sustainable food: Empirical evidence of the consumption of animal products in France. Ecological Economics, 147, 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.032
7.
BordigoniM.HitaA.Le BlancG. (2012). Role of embodied energy in the European manufacturing industry: Application to short-term impacts of a carbon tax. Energy Policy, 43, 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.011
8.
BreuschT. S.PaganA. R. (1980). Lagrange multiplier test and to model applications specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, XLVII(1), 239–253.
9.
CagatayS.MihciH. (2006). Degree of environmental stringency and the impact on trade patterns. Journal of Economic Studies, 33(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580610639884
10.
ChengB.DaiH.WangP.ZhaoD.MasuiT. (2015). Impacts of carbon trading scheme on air pollutant emissions in Guangdong Province of China. Energy for Sustainable Development, 27, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.06.001
11.
ChoiI. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
12.
CluneS.CrossinE.VergheseK. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 766–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082
13.
CopelandB. R.TaylorM. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71.
14.
CostantiniV.MazzantiM. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, 41(1), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.004
15.
DmitrievO. N.NovikovS. V. (2018). Transformation of russian tax system as part of the integration of the economy into international high-technology production field of socio-economic systems. European Research Studies Journal, XXI(Issue 4), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1130
16.
EderingtonJ. (2007). Nafta and the pollution haven hypothesis. Policy Studies Journal, 35(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00218.x
17.
GaoY.YaoX.WangW.LiuX. (2019). Dynamic effect of environmental tax on export trade: Based on DSGE mode. Energy & Environment, 30(7), 1275–1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19842380
18.
HeP.ZouX.QiaoY.ChenL.WangX.LuoX.NingJ. (2019). Does the double dividend of environmental tax really play a role in OECD countries? A study based on the panel ARDL model. Ekoloji, 28(107), 49–62.
19.
ImK. S.PesaranM. H.ShinY. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
20.
KhanZ.SisiZ.SiqunY. (2019). Environmental regulations an option: Asymmetry effect of environmental regulations on carbon emissions using non-linear ARDL. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 41(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1504145
21.
KozlukT.TimiliotisC. (2016). Do environmental policies affect global value chains? A new perspective on the pollution haven hypothesis(OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1282). OECD.
22.
LevinA.LinC.-F.ChuJames C.-S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
23.
LiJ. F.LinZ. X. (2015). The impact of sales tax on economic growth in the United States: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Applied Economics Letters, 22(15), 1262–1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1023933
24.
LiL.ChenY.ZengL.ShaoM.XieS.ChenW.LuS.WuY.CaoW. (2014). Biomass burning contribution to ambient volatile organic compounds (Vocs) in the Chengdu–Chongqing Region (Ccr), China. Atmospheric Environment, 99, 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.067
25.
MardonesC.BaezaN. (2018). Economic and environmental effects of a CO2 tax in Latin American countries. Energy Policy, 114, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.001
26.
MatsumotoK.MasuiT. (2011). Analyzing long-term impacts of carbon tax based on the imputed price, applying the AIM/CGE model. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 22(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831111098462
27.
MittalM.SharmaC.2003. Anthropogenic Emissions from Energy Activities in India: Generation and Source Characterization, Part I. www.osc.edu/research/archieve/pcrm/emissions
28.
MobergE.AnderssonWalkerSällM.HanssonS. P.-A.RöösE. (2019). Determining the climate impact of food for use in a climate tax –Design of a consistent and transparent model. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(9), 1715–1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01597-8
29.
MorgensternR. D.HoM.ShihJ.-S.ZhangX. (2004). The near-term impacts of carbon mitigation policies on manufacturing industries. Energy Policy, 32(16), 1825–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00171-X
30.
MuradianR.Martinez-AlierJ. (2001). Trade and the environment: From a ‘Southern’ perspective. Ecological Economics, 36(2), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00229-9
31.
NkoroE.UkoKelvin A. (2016). Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) cointegration technique: Application and interpretation. Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, 5(4), 63–91.
32.
NtombelaS. M.BohlmannH. R.KalabaM. W. (2019). Greening the South Africa’s economy could benefit the food sector: Evidence from a carbon tax policy assessment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 74(2), 891–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00352-9
33.
ParlettaNatalie. (2019). What would a ‘climate diet’ look like in Australia?https://www.theguardian.com/food/2019/oct/29/what-would-a-climate-diet-look-like-in-australia
34.
PesaranM. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels(Working Papers in Economics No. 0435). University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics.
35.
PesaranM.ShinY. (1999). An Autoregressive Lag Modeling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. In StromS.. (ed) Econometrics and Economic Theory in 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch centennial Symposium, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36.
PiwowarA. (2019). Low-carbon agriculture in Poland: Theoretical and practical challenges. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 28(4), 2785–2792. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/92211
37.
PooreJ.NemecekT. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987–992.
38.
PorterM. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
39.
PorterM. E.LindeC. van der. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
40.
RiversN.SchaufeleB. (2015). The effect of carbon taxes on agricultural trade: Effect of carbon taxes on agricultural trade. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’agroeconomie, 63(2), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12048
41.
RobsonA. (2014). Australia’s carbon tax: An economic evaluation: Australia’s carbon tax: An economic evaluation. Economic Affairs, 34(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12061
42.
SällS.GrenI.-M. (2015). Effects of an environmental tax on meat and dairy consumption in Sweden. Food Policy, 55, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.05.008
43.
Sebastian. (2015, November 6). G20 emissions. Climate Transparency. https://www.climate-transparency.org/g20-emissions
44.
SedehiR.EsfahanianH. (2019). The effect of green taxes on labor productivity in the Iranian economy. Iran Economic Review, 23(4), 1041–1055.
45.
SilajdzicS.MehicE. (2017). The impact of environmental taxes on competitive performance of pollution-intensive industries among transition economies: Evidence from panel analysis. In BilginM. H.DanisH.DemirE.CanU. (Eds), Financial environment and business development (Vol. 4, pp. 155–169). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39919-5_13
46.
SpringmannM.Mason-D’CrozD.RobinsonS.WiebeK.GodfrayH. C. J.RaynerM.ScarboroughP. (2017). Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities. Nature Climate Change, 7(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3155
47.
TewariM.PillaiP. (2005). Global standards and the dynamics of environmental compliance in India’s leather industry. Oxford Development Studies, 33(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810500137947
48.
TianX.DaiH.GengY.HuangZ.MasuiT.FujitaT. (2017). The effects of carbon reduction on sectoral competitiveness in China: A case of Shanghai. Applied Energy, 197, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.026
49.
US EPA, O. (2015, July 16). Toxics release inventory (Tri) national analysis [Collections and Lists]. https://www.epa.gov/trinationalanalysis
50.
ZhaoY.-H. (2011). The study of effect of carbon tax on the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: An empirical analysis of OECD 21 countries, 1992–2008. Energy Procedia, 5, 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.225
