Are Carbon Taxes Regressive in India? Evidence from NSSO Data

Abstract

Carbon tax, being less costly in achieving a given abatement target, has been highly recommended by economists and international organisations. However, distributional concerns against the carbon tax has been a matter of concern in the domain of public policy. This article tries to analyse the distributional impact of Carbon tax in India by using National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) data. The results of the study indicate that carbon pricing seems to hit the lower-expenditure households by a greater proportion than the rich elites. The severity was found to be greater for the rural households than the urban households. Strong regressivity was found in the energy use for cooking and lighting. However, for transportation, the results indicate mild progressivity. Among the various energy fuels, households using coal, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), kerosene, firewood and dung cake for cooking and lighting were found to be hit hard by carbon pricing. In contrast, electricity consumption was found to be distributionally neutral. Petrol and diesel use for transportation were found to be progressive. The study advocates that regressivity of carbon tax should be taken into account by way of targeted revenue recycling measures like lump-sum transfers among poor households and cut in other distortionary taxes.

Keywords

Carbon tax regressivity NSSO Data revenue recycling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

S. J.

Graczyk

(2012). Understanding energy challenges in India: Policies, players and issues . IEA.

Bhat

A. A.

Mishra

P. P.

(2018). The Kyoto protocol and CO₂ emission: Is India still hibernating? Indian Growth and Development Review , 11(2), 152–168.

Callan

Lyons

Scott

Tol

R. S.

Verde

(2009). The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland. Energy Policy , 37(2), 407–412.

Datta

(2010). The incidence of fuel taxation in India. Energy Economics , 32, S26–S33.

Dinan

Austin

D. H.

(2002). Reducing gasoline consumption: Three policy options . Congressional Budget Office.

Economic Survey of India. (2015). Government of India, Ministry of Finance. http://indiabudget.gov.in

Gonzalez

(2012). Distributional effects of carbon taxes: The case of Mexico. Energy Economics , 34(6), 2102–2115.

Goto

(1995). Macroeconomic and sectoral impacts of carbon taxation: A case for the Japanese economy. Energy Economics , 17(4), 277–292.

Government of India. (2015). Economic survey of India, Indian Ministry of Finance . http://indiabudget.gov.in

10.

Govindaraju

V. C.

Tang

C. F.

(2013). The dynamic links between CO₂ emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India. Applied Energy , 104, 310–318.

11.

Lin

(2011). The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO₂ emissions. Energy Policy , 39(9), 5137–5146.

12.

Metcalf

G. E.

(1999). A distributional analysis of green tax reforms. National Tax Journal , 52, 655–682.

13.

Metcalf

G. E.

(2009). Designing a carbon tax to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy , 3(1), 63–83.

14.

Poterba

J. M.

(1991). Is the gasoline tax regressive. Tax Policy and the Economy , 5, 145–164.

15.

Rao

N. D.

(2012). Kerosene subsidies in India: When energy policy fails as social policy. Energy for Sustainable Development , 16(1), 35–43.

16.

West

S. E.

(2004). Distributional effects of alternative vehicle pollution control policies. Journal of Public Economics , 88(3), 735–757.

17.

Yusuf

A. A.

Resosudarmo

(2007). On the distributional effect of carbon tax in developing countries: The case of Indonesia (Working Paper No. 200705). Padjadjaran University.

18.

Ziramba

Kumo

W. L.

Akinboade

(2009). Economic instruments for environmental regulation in Africa: An analysis of the efficacy of fuel taxation for pollution control in South Africa (CEEPA Discussion Paper No. 44). CEEPA.