There is some evidence that an increase in the regional manufacturing disparity in India is associated with regional (panel data specific) embodiment hypothesis. The purpose of the present article is to provide different interpretations of such association. It endeavours to illustrate that the neoclassical perspective is best suited for universal applications (and long-run tendency towards global regional convergence), and the tweaking of such principles—to generate conditional convergence theories, just to explain persistence regional disparity—fails to convince. In this present context, the present article adopts an augmented Keynesian–Youngian thesis wherein the embodiment hypothesis not only explains the intrinsic possibility of the disparity but also makes clear why the so-called conditional variables (emphasised otherwise by the neoclassical attempts) differ regionally.
BabuS. M.NatarajanR. R. (2013). Growth and spread of manufacturing productivity across regions in India. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 53.
2.
BardhanP. (1995). The contribution of endogenous growth theories to the analysis of development problems: An assessment. In BehrmanJ.SrinivasanT. N. (Eds), Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 2983–2998). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
3.
BleckerR. A. (2013). Long run growth in open economies: Exports led cumulative causation or a balance of payments constraint. In HarcourtG.KrieslerP. (Eds), Handbook of post-Keynesian economics (pp. 390–414). London: Oxford University Press.
4.
Burton-JonesA.SpenderJ. C. (Eds). (2011). The Oxford handbook of human capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
CoaseR. H. (1937). The nature of firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
HallR. E.JonesI. J. (1999). Why some countries produce so much more output per worker than others. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116.
8.
HuangK. X. D.LiuZ.PhaneufL. (2004). Why does the cyclical behaviour of real wages change over time?American Economic Review, 94(4), 836–856.
9.
KaldorN. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. In LutzF. (Ed.), Theory of capital (pp. 227–281). London: Macmillan.
10.
KaldorN. (1972). The irrelevance of equilibrium economics. Economic Journal, 82(328), 1237–1255. (Reprinted in Targetti, F., & Thirlwall, A. P. (Eds). (1989). The essential Kaldor. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co).
11.
KaldorN. (1981). The role of increasing returns, technical progress and cumulative causation in the theory of international trade and economic growth. Economic Appliquee, 34(4), 633–648. (Reprinted in Targetti, F., & Thirlwall, A. P. (Eds). (1989). The essential Kaldor (pp. 325–350). London: Gerald Duckworth and Co).
12.
KlenowP. J.Rodriguez-ClareA. (2004). Externalities and growth. In AghionP.DurlaufS. (Eds), Handbook of economic growth (pp. 817–861). North Holland (Amsterdam): Elsevier B V.
13.
LachmannL. M. (1977). Capital, expectations and the market process. Mission, KS: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.
14.
LewinP. (2011). A capital based approach to the firm: Reflections on the nature and scope of the concept of capital and its extension to intangibles. In Burton-JonesA.SpendeJ. C. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of human capital (pp. 145–161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
LucasR. E. (1988). On the mechanism of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.
16.
MankiwN. G.RomerD.WeilD. N. (1992). A contribution to empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.
17.
MookherjeeD.RayD. (2001). Reading in the theory of economic development. Massachusetts, US: Oxford University Press.
18.
PackH. (1994). Endogenous growth theory: Intellectual appeal and empirical shortcomings. Journal of Economic Perspective, 8(1), 55–72.
19.
PadhiS. P. (1987). Analysis of the form and pattern of private foreign investment in manufacturing industries in India: 1963–64 to 1979–80 (MPhil Dissertation). New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University.
20.
PadhiS. P. (2002). Interstate competition policies and the regional convergence hypothesis: A framework of analysis of regional FDI inflows. Artha Vijnana, 44(2), 113–136.
21.
PadhiS. P. (2014a). Assessing manufacturing growth in India: An alternative view. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(3), 526–540.
22.
PadhiS. P. (2014b). Human capital formation, good employment opportunities & the firm. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(2), 213–223.
23.
PadhiS. P. (2015a). An evaluation of Indian manufacturing exports performance. Foreign Trade Review, 50(1), 41–52.
24.
PadhiS. P. (2015b). Income distribution, employment growth & the Kaldor–Verdoorn growth facts. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(2), 173–186.
25.
PapolaT. S.MauryaN.JenaN. (2011). Inter-regional disparities in industrial growth and structure. New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
26.
RomerP. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.
27.
RomerP. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102.
28.
RomerP. M. (1991). Increasing returns and new developments in growth theory. In BarnettW. A. (Ed.), Equilibrium theory and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
SaxenianA. (2000). The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. In SwedbergR. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The social science view (pp. 308–331). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
30.
SchererF. M. (1967). Research and development resource allocation under rivalry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81(3), 359–394.
31.
SenA. (1984). The profit motive. In SenA. (Ed.), Resource, values, development (pp. 90–110). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
32.
SkarsteinR. (1997). Development theory. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
33.
SolowR. M. (1957). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 5–94.
34.
SolowR. M. (2000). Growth theory: An exposition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
SoukiazisE.CerqueiraP. A. (2012). Models of balance of payments constrained growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
StiglerG. (1951). Division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 59(3), 185–193.
37.
SwanT. W. (1970). Golden ages and production function. In SenA. (Ed.) Growth economics (pp. 203–218). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
38.
ThirlwallA. P. (1979). The balance of payments constraint as an explanation of international growth rate differences. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 32(128), 45–53.
39.
ThirlwallA. P. (2011). Balance of payments constrained growth models: History and overview. PSL Quarterly Review, 64(259), 307–351.
40.
WacziargR. (2002). Review of Easterly’s the elusive quest for growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(3), 907–918.
41.
WilliamsonO. E. (1971). The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 61(2), 112–123.
42.
WilliamsonO. E. (1973). Market and hierarchies: Some elementary considerations. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 63(2), 316–325.
43.
WolffE. (1987). Capital formation and long-term productivity growth (Working Paper 87–37). New York: C. V. Starr Centre for Applied Economics, New York University.
44.
YangX.BorlandJ. (1991). A microeconomic mechanism for economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 460–482.
