This article maintains that the need to increase the share of manufacturing (in real terms) in gross domestic product (GDP) from the present around 15 per cent to around 25 per cent is an important policy focus but signifies an arduous task in the context of intense global competitiveness. It should allow for providing encouragement to firms to search for greater markets backed by a concentrated effort to carry out narrow specialisations in a few manufacturing related tasks/products. It can only contribute immeasurably towards encouraging ‘inquiring minds’ that in turn supports a tendency towards knowledge-based economy for the purpose of the long-term meaningful participation in international trade (and finance).
BleckerR. A. (2009). Davidson on Keynes: The open economy dimension. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 32(1), 19–41.
2.
BleckerR. A. (2013). Long run growth in open economies: Exports led cumulative causation or a balance of payments constraint. In HarcourtG.KrieslerP. (Eds), Handbook of post Keynesian economics (pp. 390–414). London: Oxford University Press.
3.
CarlosG.RivasL. A.GarcimartinezM. P. (2010). On the role of relative prices and capital flows in balance of payment constrained growth: The experience of Portugal in the Euro area. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 33(2), 281–306.
4.
ChaneyT.OssaR. (2013). Market size, division of labour, and firm productivity. Journal of International Economics, 90, 177–180.
5.
ChaudhuriS. (2013). Manufacturing trade deficit and industrial policy in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(8), 41–50.
6.
DeanM.Sebastia–BarrielM. (2004, Autumn). Why has world trade grown faster than world output? Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin.
7.
DharB.Chalapati RaoK. S. (2014). India’s current account deficit: Causes and cures. Economic & Political Weekly, 49(21), 41–45.
8.
DixonR. J.ThirlwallA. P. (1975). A model of regional growth–rate differences on Kaldorian lines. Oxford Economic Papers, 26(2), 201–214.
9.
FeldsteinM. (2008). Resolving the global imbalance: The dollar and the U.S. saving rate. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 113–125.
10.
GarcimartinC.AlonsoJ.RivasL. (2014). Balance of payment constrained growth and convergence: One more piece of the jigsaw. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 36(3), 555–585.
11.
GoldbergP. K.KhandelwalA.PavnickN.TopalovaP. (2010). Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal Economics, 125(4), 1727–1767.
12.
KaldorN. (1970). The case of regional policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. (Reprinted in Targetti, F. and A. P. Thirlwall (Eds). (1989). The essential Kaldor. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co.
13.
KaldorN. (1981). The role of increasing returns, technical progress and cumulative causation in the theory of international trade and economic growth. Economic Appliquee. (Reprinted in Targetti, F. and A. P. Thirlwall (Eds). (1989). The essential Kaldor. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co.
14.
KrugmanP. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 70(9), 469–479.
15.
KrugmanP. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.
16.
KrugmanP. (1989). Differences in income elasticities and trends in real exchange rate. European Economic Review, 33(5), 1031–1046.
17.
KrugmanP.BaldwinR. (1987). The persistence of the U.S. trade deficit. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 18(1), 1–56.
18.
McCombieJ. S. L.ThirlwallA. P. (1997). The dynamic Harrod trade multiplier and the demand–oriented approach to economic growth: An evaluation. International Review of Applied Economics, 11(1), 5–26.
19.
PadhiS. P. (2013). Manufacturing exports and policy formulations. Foreign Trade Review, 48(3), 267–243.
20.
PadhiS. P. (2014). Assessing manufacturing growth in India: An alternative view. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(3), 526–540.
21.
PadhiS. P. (2015). An evaluation of Indian manufacturing exports performance. Foreign Trade Review, 50(1), 41–52.
22.
PorterM. (1992). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
23.
Rodriguez–ClareA. (1996). The division of labor and economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 3–32.
24.
RowthornR.CouttsK. (2013). De–industrialisation and the balance of payments in advanced economies (Working Paper No. 453). Cambridge, UK: Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
25.
SinghA. (1977). UK industry and the world economy: A case of de–industrialisation? CambridgeJournal of Economics, 1(2), 113–136.
26.
SinghA. (1987). Manufacturing and de–industrialization. In EatwellJ.MilgateM.NewmanP. (Eds), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics (Vol. 3). London: Macmillan.
27.
SoukiazisE.CerqueiraP. A. (2012). Models of balance of payments constrained growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
StiglerG. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 59(3), 185–193.
29.
ThirlwallA. P. (1979). The balance of payments constraint as an explanation of international growth rate differences. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 128, 45–53.
30.
ThirlwallA. P. (2011, December). Balance of payments constrained growth models: History and overview. PSL Quarterly Review, 64(259), 307–351.
31.
WoodA. (1994). North–South trade, employment and inequality: Changing fortunes in a skill–driven world. Oxford: Clarendon.
