This paper studies the connections between Prakrit and early Maṇipravāḷam literature from premodern Kerala. Maṇipravāḷam (literally, ‘gems and corals’) is the emic term for a dominant part of Kerala’s premodern vernacular literature, binding together Kerala’s local language and Sanskrit. As a highly Sanskritised register of a Dravidian language, Maṇipravāḷam has generally been viewed as having been inspired and influenced by either Sanskrit or Tamil literature, grammar, and poetics. This paper, however, highlights a rarely discussed aspect: the role of Prakrit in shaping both Maṇipravāḷam literature and theory. I discuss the relation between Prakrit and Maṇipravāḷam in two connected ways: first, by considering the similarities between the practices themselves, especially in terms of their themes and aesthetics; and second, by examining the implicit ways in which Maṇipravāḷam theory, as it is presented in the Līlātilakam, Kerala’s first grammar and work on poetics, is structured on Prakrit materials or on Sanskrit materials dealing with Prakrit.
Abhinavabharatī of Abhinavagupta. In Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharatamuni with the Commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Abhinavaguptācārya. 4 vols. Vadodara [Baroda], 1992–2006.
2.
BorgesJ. L.Collected Fictions. Translated by HurleyAndrew. New York, NY, 1999.
3.
Candrolsavam. Edited by Elamkulam P. N. Kunjan Pillai. Trivandrum, 1969 (1962).
4.
DevadevanV. M.‘Knowing and Being: Kūṭiyāṭṭaṃ and Its Semantic Universe’, in OberlinH. and ShulmanD. D., eds, with the cooperation of E. Mucciarelli, Two Masterpieces of Kūṭṭiyāṭṭam: Aṅgulīyāṅkam and Mantrāṅkam, Delhi, 2019, pp. 275–305.
5.
FreemanR.‘Rubies and Coral: The Lapidary Crafting of Language in Kerala’, Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 57(1), 1998, pp. 38–65.
6.
FreemanR.‘Caught in Translation: Ideologies of Literary Language in Kerala’s Maṇipravāḷam’, in CoxWhitney and VergianiVincenzo, eds, Bilingual Discourse and Cross-Cultural Fertilisation: Sanskrit and Tamil in Medieval India, Pondicherry, 2013, pp. 199–240.
7.
FreschiE. and MassP. A.‘Introduction’, in FreschiE. and MaasP. A., eds, Adaptive Reuse: Aspects of Creativity in South Asian Cultural History, Wiesbaden, 2017, pp.11–24.
8.
Goren-ArzonyS.‘Eighteen Poets and a Half: A Literary Renaissance in Medieval Kerala’, PhD dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2019.
9.
Goren-ArzonyS.‘An Actor in Red and White: The Cākyār Community and the Early Maṇiprāvaḷam Corpus’, in OberlinH. and ShulmanD. D., eds, with the cooperation of E. Mucciarelli, Two Masterpieces of Kūṭṭiyāṭṭam: Aṅgulīyāṅkam and Mantrāṅkam, Delhi, 2019, pp. 306–25.
10.
Goren-ArzonyS.‘On Sanskrit Lotuses and Bhāṣā Lilies: Poetic Flaws in the Līlātilakam’, in CiottiG. and McCannE., eds, Linguistic and Textual Aspects of Multilingualism in South India and Sri Lanka, Pondicherry, Forthcoming, pp. 429–51.
11.
HaspelmathM.‘Lexical Borrowing: Concepts and Issues’, in HaspelmathM. and TadmorU., eds, Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook, Berlin, 2009, pp. 35–54.
12.
Kavirājamārgam of Śrīvijaya. Edited by M. V. Sitaramayya. Bengaluru, 1994.
13.
Kāvyādrśa of Daṇḍin. Edited by Anantalal Thakur and Upendra Jha. Darbhanga, 1957.
14.
Kāvyaprakāśa of Mammaṭa. Edited by Ganganatha Jha. Varanasi, 1967.
15.
Līlātilakam. Edited by Elamkulam Kunjan Pillai. Kottayam, 1969 (1955).
16.
Līlātilakam. Edited by Suranad Kunjan Pillai. Thiruvananthapuram, 1996 (1946).
17.
McCreaL. J. and PatilP. G.. Buddhist Philosophy of Language in India: Jṅānaśrīmitra on Exclusion, New York, NY, 2010.
18.
Narayana RaoV. and ShulmanD. D.. Classical Telugu Poetry: An Anthology, New Delhi, 2002.
19.
Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharatamuni: With the Commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Abhinavaguptācārya, Vol. 4, Vadodara [Baroda], 1992–2006.
20.
OllettA.Language of the Snakes: Prakrit, Sanskrit, and the Language Order of Premodern India, Oakland, CA, 2017.
21.
PadmanabhamenonP.‘Vyākhyānam’, in Bhāṣānaiṣadhacampu, Kottayam, 1967 (1934).
22.
Padyaratnam. Edited by P. K. Narayana Pillai. Trivandrum, 1949.
23.
Paramesvara Aiyer, U. S.Kerala Sahityacaritram, Vol. 5. Thiruvananthapuram, 1990 (1953).
24.
Pierce TaylorS., OllettA. and Ben-HerutG.‘A Mirror and a Headlamp: The Way of the Poet-King and the Afterlife of the Mirror in the World of Kannada Literature’, in BronnerY., ed., Asian Literary Worlds in Dandin’s Mirror, Forthcoming.
25.
PollockS. I.The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India, Berkeley, 2006.
26.
Ramachandran NairK.Early Maṇipravāḷam: A Study, Trivandrum, 1971.
27.
Sankunni NairM. P.Points of Contact Between Prakrit and Malayalam, Thiruvananthapuram, 1995.
28.
Sattasaī of Hāla. Edited by Albrecht Weber. Leipzig, 1881.
29.
ShulmanD. D.‘Prabandha: Mode, Tone, Theme’. Paper presented at the ERC conference on the Early-Modern South Indian Prabandhas, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 25–27 June 2019. https://neemerc.huji.ac.il/david-shulman.
30.
Śukasandeśa of Lakṣmīdāsa. Edited by P. Unni. Delhi, 1985.
31.
TiekenH.‘The Process of Vernacularization in South Asia’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 51(2), 2008, pp. 338–83.
32.
UpadhyeA. N.‘Prakrit Language and Literature in the South’, in NayakH. M. and GopalB. R., eds, South Indian Studies, Mysore, 1990, pp. 757–66.
33.
VeluthatK.Of Ubiquitous Heroines and Elusive Heroes: The Cultural Milieu of Maṇipravālam Poetry from Medieval Kerala. Published Lecture, Indian Council of Historical Research, New Delhi, 18March2013.
