The Andhra Sahitya Parishat or the Telugu Academy as it was also known occupied a definitive role in the formation of a Telugu public and the development of Telugu literary activism in the early twentieth century. This essay revisits the early years of the Andhra Sahitya Parishat (1911–15) in order to examine questions related to the origins of ‘Telugu Classicism’ and its relationship to Indian negotiations with colonial modernity. By reviewing the Parishat’s membership, early interventions in public literary controversies, and its successful attempts to position itself as a nationalist intermediary, this essay produces new insights on the emergence and aspirations of an English-educated Telugu middle class. Ultimately, it demonstrates that Telugu Classicism was an integral dimension of early twentieth-century projects to modernise the Telugu language and constructively contributed to the imagination of Telugu as a ‘national’ as well as ‘classical’ language in an era of British imperialism.
JoshiSanjay. Fractured Modernity: Making of a Middle Class in Colonial North India, New Delhi, 2001.
14.
KingChristopher. ‘The Nagari Pracharini Sabha (Society for the Promotion of the Nagar Script and Language) of Benares 1893–1914: A Study in the Social and Political History of the Hindi Language’, unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1976.
15.
KrishnaK. R. V.Andhra Bhasha Abhivriddhi, Rajahmundry, 1896.
16.
LelyveldDavid. Aligarh’s First Generation: Muslim Solidarity in British India, Princeton, 1977.
17.
Madras PresidencyReport on the Administration of the Madras Presidency During the Year 1909–10. Madras, 1910.
18.
MantenaRama Sundari. ‘Imperial Ideology and the Uses of Rome in Discourses on Britain’s Indian Empire’, in BradleyMark, ed, Classics and Imperialism in the British Empire, New York, 2010, pp. 54–73.
19.
MantenaRama Sundari. ‘Vernacular Publics and Political Modernity: Language and Progress in Colonial South India’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 47(5), 2013, pp. 1678–1705.
20.
MitchellLisa. Language, Emotion, and Politics in South India: The Making of a Mother Tongue, Bloomington, 2009.
21.
Narayana RaoVelcheru. ‘Print and Prose: Pundits, Karanams, and the East India Company in the Making of Modern Telugu’, in BlackburnStuart and DalmiaVasudha, eds, India’s Literary History: Essays on the Nineteenth Century, Delhi, 2004.
ReddyN. Manohar. ‘Assault of the Grantha Gaze on Dalit Bahujan Gramya Language’, in Anveshi Broadsheet on Contemporary Politics, Vol. 2 (4&5), 2014, pp. 45–46.
ShulmanDavid and RaoVelcheru Narayana. ed. Poem at the Right Moment: Remembered Verses from Premodern South India, Los Angeles, 1998.
27.
StarkUlrike‘Associational Culture and Civic Engagement in Colonial Lucknow: The Jalsah-e Tahzib’. Indian Economic and Social History Review, Vol. 48(1), 2011, pp. 1–33.
28.
SubramaiahG. R.‘Discursive Remarks on the Augustan Age of Telugu Literature’. The Indian Antiquary: A Journal of Oriental Research, Vol. 27, December1898, pp. 322–335.
29.
SundarK. H. S. S.‘Origin and Growth of Political Consciousness in Andhra during the 19th Century’, unpublished dissertation, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, 1994.
30.
Tamil Nadu State Archives (TNSA)Educational Department Government Orders, Madras.
31.
TharuSusie and LalitaK.. ‘Empire, Nation, and the Literary Text’ in NiranjanaTejaswini, SudhirP. and DhareshwarVivek, eds, Interrogating Modernity: Culture and Colonialism in India, Calcutta, 1993.
32.
TrautmannThomas. Aryans and British India, Berkeley, 1997.
33.
VenkatarangaiyaM. ed. The Freedom Struggle in Andhra Pradesh 1906–1920, Vol. 2, Hyderabad, 1969.
34.
Venugopal RaoN.. ‘Revisiting the “Modern Telugu” Debate a Century Later: The Pre- and Post-history of Gurajada Appa Rao’s Minute of Dissent’, in SridharM. and MishraSunita, eds, Language Policy and Education in India: Documents, Contexts, and Debates, New York, 2017, pp. 90–100.
35.
ZvelebilKamil. Companion Studies to the History of Tamil Literature, Leiden, 1992.
