This article suggests that territorialisation was the dominant concept that defined British expansion in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. It underlies the Company’s efforts to impose sovereignty over the region and to exert its ‘right’ to collect tax from its inhabitants. The introduction of the plough and creation of a political economy of rule were some key means by which the Raj sought to tighten its grip over the territory and its people. Territorialisation in the Tracts manifested as the spatial, economic, agricultural, as well as political expansion of the Company state in the region. The article discusses how, in the aftermath of the raids of the early 1860s, the administration resorted to tougher policies to control, deter and counteract the raiders of the eastern hills. It suggests that by setting up institutions of economic control, as well as by modifying existing centres of political power, the Raj succeeded in capturing both the polities and the economies of the territory.
ArnoldD. and GuhaRamachandra, ‘Introduction: Themes and Issues in the Environmental History of South Asia’, in ArnoldDavid and GuhaRamachandra, eds, Nature, Culture, Imperialism: Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia, Oxford, 1995.
2.
BaruahSanjib, ‘Clash of resource use regimes in colonial Assam,’ in BaruahSanjib ed., Durable Disorder, Understanding the Politics of Northeast India, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
3.
BaruahS., ‘Confronting Constructionism’, in BaruahSanjib, ed., Durable Disorder, Understanding the Politics of Northeast India, Oxford, 2005.
4.
BatesC.Race, Caste and Tribe in Central India: the Early Origins of Anthropometry, Edinburgh, 1995.
5.
BaylyC. A.Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire, Cambridge, 1988.
6.
BatesC., ‘The British Military-fiscal State and Indigenous Resistance India 1750–1820’, in StoneLawrence, ed., An Imperial State at War, Britain from 1689–1815, London, 1994.
7.
BeamesJohn. ‘Story of My Life’, John Beames Papers, manuscript memoir by John Beames, Chapter XX, Vol. 1 (IOR paper no. MSS EUR D694), British Library, 1858–79.
8.
BentonL.A Search for Sovereignty, Cambridge, 2009.
9.
BhattacharyaN., ‘Colonial State and Agrarian Society’, in SteinBurton, ed., The Making of Agrarian Policy in British India 1770–1900, Oxford, 1992.
10.
Census of India, Vol. IV, Bengal, 1941.
11.
ChakrabartiR.Terror, Crime and Punishment: Order and Disorder in Early Colonial Bengal, 1800–1860, Kolkata, 2009.
12.
DirksN.‘The Policing of Tradition: Colonialism and Anthropology in Southern India’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 39 (1), 1997.
13.
DirksN.Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India, New Jersey, 2001.
14.
FisherM.Indirect Rule in India, New Delhi, 1991.
15.
GallagherJ. and RobinsonRonald. ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade’, The Economic History Review, Second Series, Vol. 6 (1), 1953.
16.
HettneB.Political Economy of Indirect Rule, London, 1978.
17.
HunterW. W.A Statistical Account of Bengal, Chittagong Hill Tracts, New Delhi, 1973–76. James Henry Mangles Papers, 1849–60 (IOR paper No. MSS EUR B353), British Library.
18.
LelyveldD.‘Of Kings and Kings of Kings: Ideologies of Ruling Power in Indian History’, Paper presented to the China–India Seminar, Fairbanks Center, Harvard University, 1985.
19.
LewinT. H.The Hill Tracts of Chittagong and the Dwellers Therein, with Comparative Vocabularies of the Hill Dialects, Calcutta, 1869.
20.
LewinT. H.A Fly on the Wheel; Or, How I Helped to Govern India, London, 1885.
21.
LuddenD.Where is Assam? Using Geographical History to Locate Current Social Realities, Presentation made to the Centre for Northeast India, South and Southeast Asia Studies, 22February2007. Retrieved 25December2014, from www.sas.upenn.edu/~dludden/AssamPP07.pdf
22.
MajumderC. B.Genesis of Chakma Movement in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Calcutta, 2003.
23.
MamdaniM.Citizen and Subject, Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism, New Jersey, 1996.
24.
MeyWolfgang. J. P. Mills and the Chittagong Hill Tracts, 1926/27: Tour Diary, Reports, Photographs, Annotated and Commented Edition, 2009. Retrieved 3February2015, from http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/savifadok/548/
25.
Papers of Walter Henry John Christie(IOR paper no. MSS EUR D718), British Library, 1935.
26.
Report on the Forays of the Wild Tribes of the Chittagong Frontier [from 1789], Kolkata, 1853 (Fiche no. 868–69).
27.
RobbP.‘Law and Agrarian Society in India: The Case of Bihar and the Nineteenth-century Tenancy Debate’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 22 (2), 2008.
28.
ScottJ.The Art of Not Being Governed, Connecticut, 2009.
29.
Selections from the Correspondence on the Revenue Administration of the Chittagong Hill Tracts [1868–87], Kolkata, 1887 (Fiche no. 953–58).
30.
SinghaR.A Despotism of Law: Crime and Criminal Justice in Colonial India, New Delhi, 2000.
31.
SivasundaramS.Islanded, Chicago, 2013.
32.
SkariaA.Hybrid Histories: Forests, Frontiers and Wildness in Western India, Oxford, 1999.
33.
SternP.The Company–State, Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India, Oxford, 2011.
34.
SternR. W.The Cat and the Lion, Jaipur State in the British Raj, Leiden, 1988.
35.
SundarN.Subalterns and Sovereigns: An Anthropological History of Bastar (1854–2006), Oxford, 2008.
36.
ThompsonE. P.Customs in Common, New York, 1993.
37.
WashbrookD.‘Economic Depression and the Making of “Traditional” Society in Colonial India, 1820–1855’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Vol. 6 (3), 1993.
