Through a survey of 19 leading cases on Islamic dower and divorce between 1855 and 1924, this article explores the ways in which judges acted as semi-autonomous agents by undermining the colonial legislation and personal law treatises they were expected to apply. Contrary to the view that colonial judges consistently reinforced the patriarchal authority of husbands in direct and immediate ways, it suggests that some colonial judges were working in the service of their own chivalric imperialist agenda: the defence of Muslim wives. The article focuses on two particular moves. First, colonial judges encouraged the use of inflated dower, a device intended to make the husband's power of triple talāq too expensive to use. Colonial legislators invalidated inflated dower in various parts of India, but judges confirmed the validity of inflated dower sums whenever possible. Second, judges expanded the use of delegated divorce, a device that helped Muslim wives counter their husbands' right to polygamy and unilateral divorce. In doing so, judges undermined the restricted approach to delegation taken by colonial treatises on Anglo-Islamic law.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
*Ameer-oon-Nissa v. Moorad-oon-Nissa 6 MIA (1854–57) 211.
2.
*Ashraf Ali (Meer) v. Meer Ashad Ali 16 Weekly Reporter (1871) 260.
3.
*Asma Bibi v. Abdul Samad Khan ILR 32 Allahabad (1910) 167.
4.
*Ayatunnessa Beebee v. Karam Ali ILR 36 Calcutta (1909) 23.
5.
Bachchoo Lal v. Mt. Bismilla ILR Allahabad (1936) 387.
6.
*Badarannissa Bibi v. Mafiattala 7 Bengal Law Reports (1871) 442.
7.
*Badu Mia v. Badrannessa 40 Indian Cases (1917) 803.
8.
*Baqar Mirza v. Mehdi Hasan All India Reporter (Oudh) (1917) 392.
9.
Calvin's Case, the Case of the Post–Nati 7 Coke Rep. 2a, 77 Eng. Rep. 377.
10.
Jan Mahomed Abdulla Datu v. Datu Jaffer ILR 38 Bombay (1914) 449.
11.
*Khalilal Rahaman v. Marian Bibi 59 Indian Cases (1921) 804.
12.
*Maharam Ali v. Ayesha Khatum 19 Calcutta Weekly Notes (1914–15) 1226.
13.
Mahomed Dad Mahomed v. Fatima 24 Indian Cases (1914) 881.
14.
Masthan Sahib v. Assan Bivi Ammal ILR 23 Madras (1900) 371.
15.
*Mi Nafizunissa alias Ma Enda v. Bodi Rahiman 20 Indian Cases (1913) 642.
16.
Moonshee Buzloor Ruheem v. Shumsoonnissa Begum, and Jodonath Bose v. Shumsoonnissa Begum 11 MIA (1866–67) 614.
17.
Muhammad Amin v. Mst. Aimna Bibi AIR Lahore (1931) 134.
18.
*Mulkah Do Alum Nowab Tajdar Bohoo v. Mirza Jehan Kudr, Nowab Mirza, Suman Ara Begum and Rufaatoonissa Begum 10 MIA (1863–66) 252.
19.
*Nga Kyaw v. Mi Hla 49 Indian Cases (1919) 97.
20.
*Poonoo Bibee v. Fyez Buksh 15 Bengal Law Reports (1875) 5.
21.
*Rukia Begam v. Muhammad Kazim and others ILR 32 Allahabad (1910) 477.
22.
*Sainuddin v. Latifannessa Bibi ILR 46 Calcutta (1919) 141.
23.
*Subraya Pillai v. Subraya Mudali 4 Madras High Court Reports (1882) 14.
24.
*Sugra Bibi v. Masuma Bibi ILR 2 Allahabad (1877) 573.
25.
*Sujan Singh v. Gunga Ram ILR 8 Calcutta (1882) 337.
26.
*Suleman Kadr v. Mehdi Begum Surreya Bahu ILR 21 Calcutta (1893) 135.
27.
*Syed Amjad Hosein v. Mt. Ummatul Askari 79 Indian Cases (1924) 644.
28.
*Zakeri Begum v. Sakina Begum ILR 19 Calcutta (1892) 689.
29.
‘A Plan for the Administration of Justice, extracted from the Proceedings of the Committee of Circuit, 15th August, 1772’, in S.V. Desika Char , ed., Readings in the Constitutional History of India, 1757–1947, New Delhi , 1983.
30.
Code of Civil Procedure (Act VIII of 1859) in Asutosh Mukhapadhyay , ed., The Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. V of 1908) passed by the Governor General of India in Council on the 21st March 1908, Calcutta , 1908.
31.
Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), in Ratanlal Ranchhoddas and Dhirajlal Keshavlel Thakore , English and Indian Law of Torts, Bombay , 1914.
32.
Criminal Procedure Code (Act XXV of 1861), in D.E. Cranenburgh , The Code of Criminal Procedure being Act V of 1898 as Amended up to 1923, Calcutta , 1924.
33.
Indian Evidence Act (Act I of 1872), in James Fitzjames Stephen , The Indian Evidence Act (I of 1872), Calcutta , 1872.
34.
Oudh Laws Act (Act XVIII of 1876), in D.E. Cranenburgh , Unrepealed Acts of the Governor-General in Council, Calcutta , 1892, Vol. 2.
35.
Ameer Ali, Syed . Mahommedan Law compiled from authorities in the original Arabic, Calcutta , 1929.
36.
Baillie, Neil B.E.Digest of Moohummudan Law compiled and translated from authorities in the original Arabic, Lahore , 1958.
37.
Desika Char, S.V. , ed., Readings in the Constitutional History of India, 1757–1947, New Delhi , 1983.
38.
Haldane, Richard Burdon . ‘ The Work for the Empire of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council ’, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 1(2), 1923, pp. 143–55 .
39.
Hamilton, Charles , trans. The Hedaya Commentary on the Islamic Laws, New Delhi , 1985.
40.
Hunter, W.W.The Indian Musulmans. London , 1872.
41.
Macnaghten, W.H.Principles and Precedents of Moohummudan Law, Lahore , 1977.
42.
Muhammad, Shan , ed., The Aligarh Movement: Basic Documents 1864–1898, New Delhi , 1978.
43.
Mulla, D.F.Principles of Hindu Law, Bombay , 1912.
44.
Mulla, D.F.Principles of Mahomedan Law, Bombay , 1907.
45.
Nehru, Jawaharlal . The Discovery of India, New York , 1946.
46.
Oppé, A.S. , ed., Wharton's Law Lexicon, New Delhi , 2003.
47.
‘ Prompt and Deferred Dower in Mahomedan Law ’, in All India Reporter Journal, Vol. 10, 1923, pp. 47–52 .
48.
Querry, A.Droit Musulman. Receuil de Lois concernant les Musulmans Schyite, Paris , 1871.
49.
Rankin, George . ‘ The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council ’, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 7(1), 1941, pp. 2–22 .
50.
Saksena, Kashi Prasad . Muslim Law as Administered in British India, Allahabad , 1938.
51.
Sorabji, Cornelia . The Purdahnashin, Calcutta , 1917.
52.
Tyabji, Faiz Badruddin . Islamic Law: The Personal Law of the Muslims, Bombay , 1940.
53.
Wilson, H.H. , ed., Principles of Hindu and Mohammadan Law republished from the Principles and Precedents of the same, by the late Sir W.H. Macnaghten, London , 1860.
54.
Wilson, Roland Knyvet . Islamic Law: A Digest, New Delhi , 1988.
55.
Amin, Sonia Neshat . The World of Muslim Women in Colonial Bengal, 1876–1939, Leiden , 1996.
56.
Anderson, Michael R. ‘Islamic Law and the Colonial Encounter in British India’, in David Arnold and Peter Robb , eds, Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader, Richmond, UK , 1993, pp. 165–85.
57.
Anderson, Michael R. ‘Work Construed: Ideological Origins of Labour Law in British India to 1918’, in Peter Robb , ed., Dalit Movements and the Meaning of Labour in India, New Delhi , 1993, pp. 87–120.
58.
Anderson, Michael R. and Sumit Guha , eds, Changing Concepts of Rights and Justice in South Asia, New Delhi , 2000.
59.
Baxi, Upendra . ‘“The State's Emissary”: The Place of Law in Subaltern Studies’, in Partha Chatterjee and Gyanendra Pandey , eds, Subaltern Studies VII, New Delhi , 1992, pp. 247–64.
60.
Benton, Lauren . Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900, Cambridge , 2002.
61.
Brimnes, Niels . ‘ Beyond Colonial Law: Indigenous Litigation and the Contestation of Property in the Mayor's Court in Late Eighteenth-Century Madras ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 37(3), 2003, pp. 513–50 .
62.
Cain, P.J. and A.G. Hopkins . British Imperialism: Crisis and Deconstruction 1914–1990, London , 1993.
63.
Carroll, Lucy . ‘ The Ithna Ashari Law of Intestate Succession: An Introduction to Shia Law Applicable in South Asia ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 19(1), 1985, pp. 85–124 .
64.
Carroll, Lucy . ‘ Talaq-i-Tafwid and Stipulations in a Muslim Marriage Contract: Important Means of Protecting the Position of the South Asian Muslim Wife ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 16(2), 1982, pp. 277–309 .
65.
Chandra, Sudhir . Enslaved Daughters: Colonialism, Law and Women's Rights, New Delhi , 2008.
66.
Chatterjee, Indrani . Gender, Slavery and Law in Colonial India, New Delhi , 1999.
67.
Chatterjee, Partha . The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories, Princeton , 1993.
68.
Chatterjee, Partha . ‘The Nationalist Resolution of the Women's Question’, in Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid , eds, Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History, New Brunswick, USA , 1989, pp. 233–53.
69.
Chatterjee, Partha . A Princely Impostor? The Strange and Universal History of the Kumar of Bhawa, Princeton , 1998.
70.
Cohn, Bernard . ‘From Indian Status to British Contract’, in B. Cohn , An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays, New Delhi , 1987, pp. 463–82.
71.
Chatterjee, Partha . ‘Law and the Colonial State in India’, in B. Cohn , Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge, Princeton , 1996, pp. 57–75.
72.
Cranenburgh, D.E.Unrepealed Acts of the Governor-General in Council, Calcutta , 1892.
73.
Derrett, J. Duncan . Religion, Law and the State in India, New Delhi , 1999.
74.
Dirks, Nicholas B. ‘ From Little King to Landlord: Property, Law, and the Gift under the Madras Permanent Settlement ’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 28(1), 1986, pp. 307–33 .
75.
Duman, Daniel . The English and Colonial Bars in the Nineteenth Century, London , 1983.
76.
Dutta, Nonica . ‘ Fleeting Impressions: A Girls’ College in Lucknow ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 27 January 2001, pp. 279–80 .
77.
Emon, Anver . ‘Islamic Law and the Canadian Mosaic: Politics, Jurisprudence and Multicultural Accommodation’, University of Toronto Legal Studies Series: Research Paper No. 947149. Available at the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract=947149 (accessed 27 March 2009).
78.
Fisch, Jörg . Cheap Lives and Dear Limbs: The British Transformation of the Bengal Criminal Law 1769–1817, Wiesbaden, Germany , 1983.
79.
Fyzee, Asaf A.A. ‘ Islamic Law in India ’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 5(4), 1963, pp. 401–15 .
80.
Fyzee, Asaf A.A.Cases in the Islamic Law of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, in Tahir Mahmood , ed., New Delhi , 2005.
81.
Galanter, Marc . Law and Society in Modern India, New Delhi , 1989.
82.
Ghodsi, Tamilla F. ‘ Tying a Slipknot: Temporary Marriages in Iran ’, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 15 (Winter), 1994, pp. 645–86 .
83.
Ghosh, Durba . Sex and the Family in Colonial India: The Making of Empire, Cambridge , 2006.
84.
Haeri, Shahla . Law of Desire: Temporary Marriage in Shi'i Iran, Syracuse, USA , 1989.
85.
Hardy, P.The Muslims of British India, Cambridge, UK , 1872.
86.
Hartog, Hendrik . Man and Wife in America: A history, Cambridge, USA , 2000.
87.
Hasan, Tariq . The Aligarh Movement and the Making of the Indian Muslim Mind, 1857–2002, New Delhi , 2006.
88.
Hibbert, Christopher . The Great Mutiny India 1857, London , 1978.
89.
Holcombe, Lee . Wives and Property: Reform of the Married Women's Property Law in Nineteenth-century England, Toronto , 1983.
90.
Horstman, Allen . Victorian Divorce, New York , 1985.
91.
Howell, P.A.The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council 1833–1876: Its Origins, Structure and Development, Cambridge , 1979.
92.
Hulsebosch, Daniel . Constituting Empire: New York and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in the Atlantic World, 1664–1830, Chapel Hill, USA , 2005.
93.
Ibbetson, David . ‘Sir William Jones as Comparative Lawyer’, in Alexander Murray , ed., Sir William Jones, 1746–1794: A Commemoration, Oxford , 1998, pp. 17–42.
94.
Inalcik, Halil . ‘Ottoman Archival Materials on Millets’, in Benjamin Braude and Bernard Lewis , eds, Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The Functioning of a Plural Society. Volume 1: The Central Lands, New York , 1982, pp. 437–49.
95.
Jain, M.P.Outlines of Indian Legal History, Agra , 2001.
96.
Jain, M.S.The Aligarh Movement: Its Origins and Development, 1858–1906, Agra , 1965.
97.
Jones, Justin . ‘The Shi'a Muslims of the United Provinces of India, 1890–1940’, Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University , 2007.
98.
Karpat, Kemal H. ‘Millets and Nationality: The Roots of the Incongruity of Nation and State in the Post-Ottoman Era’, in Benjamin Braude and Bernard Lewis , eds, Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The Functioning of a Plural Society. Volume 1: The Central Lands, New York , 1982, pp. 141–70.
99.
Kodoth, Praveena . ‘ Courting Legitimacy or Delegitimizing Custom? Sexuality, Sambandham, and Marriage Reform in Late Nineteenth-Century Malabar ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 35(2), 2001, pp. 349–84 .
100.
Kolsky, Elizabeth . ‘ Codification and the Rule of Colonial Difference: Criminal Procedure in British India ’, Law and History Review, Vol. 23(3), 2005, pp. 631–83 .
101.
Kugle, Scott Alan . ‘ Framed, Blamed and Renamed: The Recasting of Islamic Jurisprudence in Colonial South Asia ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 35(2), 2001, pp. 257–313 .
102.
Lahiri, Shompa . Indians in Britain: Anglo-Indian Encounters, Race and Identity, 1880–1930, London , 2000.
103.
Lokhandwalla, S.T. ‘ Islamic Law and Ismaili Communities ’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, Vol. 4(2), 1967, pp. 155–76 .
104.
Mendelsohn, Oliver . ‘From Colonial to Post-Colonial Law in India’, in Veronica Taylor , ed., Asian Laws through Australian Eyes, Sydney , 1997, pp. 298–99.
105.
Metcalf, Barbara Daly . Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860–1900, Princeton , 1982.
106.
Metcalf, Thomas R.Ideologies of the Raj, Cambridge, UK , 1995.
107.
Mines, Mattison . ‘ Courts of Law and Styles of Self in Eighteenth-Century Madras: From Hybrid to Colonial Self ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 35(1), 2001, pp. 33–74 .
108.
Mitchell, Paul . ‘Law and India at King's College London’, in Andrew Lewis , Paul Brand and Paul Mitchell , eds, Law in the City: Proceedings of the Seventeenth British Legal History Conference, London, 2005, Dublin , 2007, pp. 262–82.
109.
Mody, Perveez . ‘ Love and the Law: Love-Marriage in Delhi ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 36(1), 2002, pp. 223–56 .
110.
Nair, Janaki . Women and Law in Colonial India: A Social History, New Delhi , 1996.
111.
Nasir, Jamal J.The Islamic Law of Personal Status, London , 1986.
112.
Okin, Susan Moller . ‘ Patriarchy and Married Women's Property in England: Questions on Some Current Views ’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Vol. 17 (2), 1983–84, pp. 21–38 .
113.
Parashar, Archana . ‘Do Changing Concepts of Gender Justice Have a Place in Indian Women's Lives? A Study of Some Aspects of Christian Personal Laws’, in Michael R. Anderson and Sumit Guha , eds, Changing Concepts of Rights and Justice in South Asia, New Delhi , 2000, pp. 140–78.
114.
Parker, Kunal . ‘ “A Corporation of Superior Prostitutes”: Anglo-Indian Legal Conceptions of Temple Dancing Girls, 1800–1914 ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 32(3), 1998, pp. 559–633 .
115.
Parker, Kunal . ‘ Interpreting Oriental Cases: The Law of Alterity in the Colonial Courtroom ’, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 107, 1994, pp. 1711–29 .
116.
Pearl, David and Werner Menski . Muslim Family Law, London , 1998.
117.
Rogers, John D. ‘Cultural and Social Resistance: Gambling in Colonial Sri Lanka’, in Douglas Haynes and Gyan Prakash , eds, Contesting Power: Resistance and Everyday Power Relations in South Asia, Berkeley, USA , 1991, pp. 175–212.
118.
Schmitthener, Samuel . ‘ A Sketch of the Development of the Legal Profession in India ’, Law and Society Review, 3(2–3), pp. 349–55 .
119.
Shanley, Mary Lyndon . Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895, Princeton , 1989.
120.
Sharafi, Mitra . ‘ A New History of Colonial Lawyering: Likhovski and Legal Identities in the British Empire ’, Law and Social Inquiry, 32(4), 2007, pp. 1059–94 .
121.
Sharafi, Mitra . ‘Judging Conversion to Zoroastrianism: Behind the Scenes of the Parsi Panchayat Case (1908)’, in John R. Hinnells and Alan Williams , eds, Parsis in India and the Diaspora, London , 2007, pp. 159–80.
122.
Shodhan, Amrita . A Question of Community: Religious Groups and Colonial Law, Kolkata , 2001.
123.
Sinha, Mrinalini . Colonial Masculinity: The ‘Manly Englishman’ and the ‘Effeminate Bengali’ in the Late Nineteenth Century, Manchester , 1995.
124.
Singha, Radhika . A Despotism of Law: Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India, New Delhi , 1998.
125.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty . ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ in Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg , eds, Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Urbana, USA , 1988, pp. 271–313.
126.
Sreenivas, Mytheli . ‘ Conjugality and Capital: Gender, Families, and Property under Colonial Law in India ’, Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 63(4), 2004, pp. 937–60 .
127.
Staves, Susan . Married Women's Separate Property in England, 1660–1833, Cambridge, USA , 1990.
128.
Steingass, F.J. , Comprehensive Persian-English Dictionary, available at http://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/steingass/ (accessed on 27 March 2009).
129.
Stone, Lawrence . Road to Divorce: England 1530–1987, Oxford , 1990.
130.
Visram, Rozina . Asians in Britain: 400 Years of History, London , 2002.
131.
Washbrook, David A. ‘ Economic Depression and the Making of “Traditional” Society in Colonial India 1820–1855 ’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Sixth Series, Vol. 3, 1993, pp. 237–63 .
132.
Washbrook, David A. ‘ Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 15(3), 1981, pp. 649–721 .
133.
Wright, Danaya . ‘ De Manneville v. De Manneville: Rethinking the Birth of Custody Law under Patriarchy ’, Law and History Review, Vol. 17 (Summer), 1999, pp. 247–307 .
