Using nineteenth-century case law, legal and social theory, and ethnography, this essay will examine colonial attempts to coalesce complex relational identities into individual and collective ones, and to create ‘the Hindu joint family’ as a codified ritual and property-holding collective. Focussing on texts and court cases that considered the ‘joint family’ as a social unit under siege or a property collective at the point of dissolution, we can see how individuals were forced to privilege certain social and intimate bonds above others in establishing a clear identity before the state. The importance of the creation of alienable property rights and markets in land became a clear motive for supporting the North Indian Hindu joint family as a social norm across India. Courts felt free to assign identities and to codify customs when confronted with syncretic practices or blurred ‘traditions’ that had characterised eighteenth-century families.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anonymous. A Criti cal Essay on the Hindoo Law of Adoption by a Hindoostani Hindoo Vakeel, Calcutta , 1880.
2.
Bhattacharyya, Krishna Kamal . The Law Relating to the Joint Hindu Family, Tagore Law Lectures 1884–85, Calcutta , 1885.
3.
Cowell, Herbert . The Hindu Law: Being a Treatise on the Law Administered Exclusively to Hindus by the British Courts in India, Tagore Law Lectures, 1870, 1871, Calcutta , 1870.
Dass, Ishuree . Domestic Manners and Customs of the Hindoos of Northern India, or, More Strictly Speaking, of the North-West Provinces of India, Benares , 1860.
6.
Fyzee, Asaf A.A.Cases in the Muhammadan Law of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, 2nd edn, New Delhi , 2005.
7.
Iyer, G. Subramania . ‘The Hindu Joint Family System’, in C. Yajnesvara Chintamani , ed., Indian Social Reform in Four Parts: Being a Collection of Essays, Adresses, Speeches, &C. With a Appendix, Madras , 1901.
8.
Macnaghten, W.H.Principles and Precedents of Moohummudan Law: Being a Compilation of Primary Rules Relative to the Doctrine of Inheritance (Including the Tenets of the Schia Sectaries), Contracts and Miscellaneous Subjects, and Selection of Legal Opinions Involving Those Points, Delivered in The.. Presidency of Fort William; Together with Notes Illustrative and Explanatory, and Preliminary Remarks, Calcutta , 1825.
9.
Maine, Henry Sumner . Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas, London , 1861.
10.
Mitra, A.C.The Hindu Law of Inheritance, Partition, Stridhan and Wills: With Leading Cases from 1825 to 1895, 3rd edn, Calcutta , 1895.
11.
Mitra, Ram Charan . The Law of Joint Property and Partition in British India, Tagore Law Lectures 1895–96, Calcutta , 1897.
12.
Mullick, Bulloram . Essays on the Hindu Family in Bengal, Calcutta , 1882.
13.
‘Opinion on the Subject of Ancestral Land in Execution of Civil Court Decrees’, New Delhi , 1862–63.
14.
Phear, Mr Justice John Budd . ‘ The Hindoo Joint Family. A Lecture Delivered at the Bethune Society 18 March 1867 ’, in The Proceedings and Transactions of the Bethune Society from 10 November 1859 to 20 April 1869, Calcutta, 1870.
15.
Raj Bahadur and Others (Defendants) V. Bishen Dayal (Plaintiff), IV Indian Law Reports, Allahabad Series 343 (1882).
16.
Rattigan, W.H.The Hindu Law of Adoption, London , 1873.
17.
Sarkar, Gopalchandra . The Hindu Law of Adoption, Tagore Law Lectures, 1888, Calcutta , 1891.
18.
Spencer, Herbert . Ajneya-Mimansa [Herbert Spencer's Philosophy of the Unknowable: A Critical Exposition of the First Part of Spencer's First Principles], Translated by Kannomal Lall , Allahabad , 1916.
19.
Strange, Thomas Andrew Lumisden . Hindu Law: Principally with Reference to Such Portions of It as Concern the Administration of Justice, in the King's Courts, in India, 2nd edn, London , 1830.
20.
West, Raymond, Georg Buhler . A Digest of the Hindu Law of Inheritance, Partition, and Adopt ion Embodying the Replies of the Sastris with Introduction and Notes by the Late Sir Raymond West, K.C.I.E, a Judge of the High Court at Bombay, and Syed H.R. Abdul Majid, M.A., Ll.D., of Gray's Inn, Barrister-at-Law, 4th edn, London , 1919.
21.
Agnes, Flavia , Sudhir Chandra and Monmayee Basu . Women and Law in India: An Omnibus Comprising Law and Gender Inequality: The Politics of Women's Rights in India, Enslaved Daughters: Colonialism, Law and Women's Rights; and Hindu Women and Marriage Law: From Sacrament to Contract, Oxford , 2004.
22.
Bayly, C.A.Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire, in Gordon Johnson , ed., The New Cambridge History of India, 7th edn, Cambridge , 1988.
23.
Bayly, Susan . Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age, in Gordon Johnson , ed., The New Cambridge History of India, Cambridge , 1999.
24.
Biswas, Arun Kumar ed., Gleanings of the Past and the Science Movement in the Diaries of Drs. Mahendralal and Amritlal Sircar, Calcutta , 2000.
25.
Chandra, Sudhir . The Oppressive Present: Literature and Social Consciousness in Colonial India, New Delhi , 1992.
26.
Chatterjee, Indrani . Gender, Slavery and Law in Colonial India, Oxford , 1999.
27.
Chatterjee, Indrani . ed., Unfamiliar Relations: Family and History in South Asia, New Brunswick , 2004.
28.
Cohn, Bernard S. ‘ From Indian Status to British Contract ’, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 21(4), 1961, pp. 613–28 .
29.
Dalmia, Vasudha . The Nationalization of Hindu Traditions: Bharatendu Harischandra and Nineteenth-Century Banaras, New Delhi , 1997.
30.
Galanter, Marc . ‘The Displacement of Traditional Law in Modern India’, in Rajeev Dhavan , ed., Law and Society in Modern India, New Delhi , 1997, pp. 15–36.
31.
Hardgrove, Anne . Community and Public Culture: The Marwaris in Calcutta, New Delhi , 2004.
32.
Heimsath, Charles H.Indian Nationalism and Hindu Social Reform, Princeton, NJ , 1964.
33.
Karve, Irawati . Kinship Organization in India, Bombay , 1965.
34.
Kasturi, Malavika . Embattled Identities: Rajput Lineages and the Colonial State in Nineteenth-Century North India, New Delhi , 2005.
35.
Kasturi, Malavika . ‘The Social History of the Rajput Clans in Colonial North India, Circa 1800–1900’, University of Cambridge , 1997.
36.
Kodoth, Praveena . ‘ Courting Legitimacy or Delegitimizing Custom? Sexuality, Sambandham, and Marriage Reform in Late Nineteenth-Century Malabar ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 35 (2), 2001, pp. 349–84 .
37.
Leonard, Karen Isaksen . Social History of an Indian Caste: The Kayasths of Hyderabad, Berkeley , 1978.
38.
Metcalf, Thomas R.Ideologies of the Raj, in Gordon Johnson , ed., The New Cambridge History of India, Cambridge , 1995.
39.
Minault, Gail . ‘Introduction: The Extended Family as Metaphor and the Expansion of Women's Realm’, in Gail Minault , ed., The Extended Family: Women and Political Participation in India and Pakistan, New Delhi , 1981, pp. 3–18.
40.
Schmitthener, Samuel . ‘ A Sketch of the Development of the Legal Profession in India ’, Law and Society Review, Vol. 3 (2–3), 1968–69, pp. 337–82 .
41.
Shah, A.M. ‘Changes in the Indian Family: An Examination of Some Assumptions’, in Parimal Kumar Roy , ed., The Indian Family: Change and Persistance, New Delhi , 2000, pp. 99–111.
42.
Shah, A.M.The Household Dimension of the Family in India: A Field Study in a Gujarat Village and a Review of Other Studies, Berkeley , 1974.
43.
Srinivas, M.N.Religion and Society among the Coorgs of South India, Oxford , 1952.
44.
Sturman, Rachel . ‘Family Values: Refashioning Property and Family in Colonial Bombay Presidency, 1818–1937’, University of California, Davis , 2001.
