Anderson, Michael . ‘Islamic Law and Colonial Encounter in British India’, in David Arnold and Peter Robb , eds, Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader, Richmond, Surrey , 1993, pp. 165–85.
2.
Baxi, Upendra . ‘“The State's Emissary”: The Place of Law in Subaltern Studies’, in Partha Chatterjee and Gyanendra Pandey , eds, Subaltern Studies VII, New Delhi , 1992, pp. 247–64.
3.
Brimnes, Neil . ‘ Beyond Colonial Law: Indigenous Litigation and the Contestation of Property in the Mayor's Court in Late Eighteenth Century Madras ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 37 (3), 2003, pp. 513–50 .
4.
Chakravarti, Uma . Rewriting History: The Life and Times of Pandita Ramabai, New Delhi , 1998.
5.
Chatterjee, Indrani . Gender, Slavery and Law in Colonial India, New Delhi , 1999.
6.
Cohn, Bernard . Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India, Princeton , 1996.
7.
Dirks, Nicholas . ‘ From Little King to Landlord: Property, Law, and the Gift under the Madras Permanent Settlement ’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 28 (2), 1986, pp. 307–33 .
8.
Dirks, Nicholas . The Hollow Crown: Ethno-history of an Indian Kingdom, Cambridge , 1987.
9.
Fisch, Jörg . Cheap Lives and Dear Limbs: The British Transformation of the Bengal Criminal Law 1769–1817, Wiesbaden , 1983.
10.
Guha, Sumit . ‘Wrongs and Rights in the Maratha Country: Antiquity, Custom and Power in Eighteenth-Century India’, in Michael Anderson and Sumit Guha , eds, Changing Conceptions of Law and Justice in South Asia, New Delhi , 1997, pp. 14–29.
11.
Kolsky, Elizabeth . ‘ A Note on the Study of Indian Legal History ’, Law & History Review, Vol. 23 (3), 2005 (Fall 2005 Forum: Colonial Order, British Law: The Empire and India), pp. 703–06 .
12.
Kugle, Scott . ‘ Framed, Blamed and Renamed: The Recasting of Islamic Jurisprudence in Colonial South Asia ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 35 (2), 2001, pp. 257–313 .
13.
Ludden, David . ‘Orientalist Empiricism: Transformations of Colonial Knowledge’, in Carol A. Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer , eds, Orientalism and the Postcolonial PredicamentPhiladelphia , 1993, pp. 250–78.
14.
Mani, Lata . Contentious Traditions: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India, Berkeley , 1998.
15.
Mines, Mattison . ‘ Courts of Law and Styles of Self in Eighteenth-Century Madras: From Hybrid to Colonial Self ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 35 (1), 2001, pp. 33–74 .
16.
Nair, Janaki . Women and Law in Colonial India: A Social History, Delhi , 1996.
17.
Parker, Kunal M. ‘ The Historiography of Difference’ , Law & History Review, Vol. 23 (3), 2005 (Fall 2005 Forum: Colonial Order, British Law: The Empire and India), 685–95 .
18.
Singha, Radhika . A Despotism of Law: Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India, New Delhi , 1998.
19.
Sreenivas, Mytheli . ‘ Conjugality and Capital: Gender, Families, and Property under Colonial Law in India ’, Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 63 (4), 2004, pp. 937–60 .
20.
Sturman, Rachel . ‘ Property and Attachments: Defining Autonomy and the Claims of Family in Nineteenth-Century Western India ’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 47 (3), 2005, pp. 611–37 .
21.
Washbrook, David . ‘ Law, state and agrarian society in colonial India ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 15 (3), 1981, pp. 649–721 .
22.
Wilson, Jon E. ‘ Anxieties of Distance: Codification in Early Colonial Bengal ’, Modern Intellectual History, Vol. 4 (1), 2007, pp. 7–23 .
