This article explores the interaction between a kingdom on the Himalayan frontier and colonial rule. Drawing on recent anthropological research regarding the local expression of political sovereignty through ‘government by deity’ (devta ka raj), it aims to reinterpret the actions taken by Bashahr's ruling class in relation to their colonial superiors. As British interests in modernisation and forestry challenged the rulers’ power base, the latter devised alternative methods in order to retain their authority. The increasing contestation of power in the latter half of the nineteenth century gradually polarised the kingdom's ruling strata between those advocating accommodation to British rule and those bent on retaining their independence. The culmination of this process saw a transformed kingship in early twentieth-century Bashahr.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
British Library, Oriental and India Office Collections
2.
IOR/F/4/570/13992 (Papers regarding the Settlement of the State of Bashahr), May 1815-Dec. 1816.
IOR/L/PS/10/194 (Political and Secret Department Records), 1911-16.
5.
India Office Records, IOR/R/1/1/426 (Political Department Records) Proceedings of the Government of India in the Foreign Department for the month of February 1911, Secret-I, Calcutta, 1911.
6.
IOR/V/10/826 (Bashahr Administration Report, 1914/15-1917/18), Report on the Administration of the Bashahr State for the year Sambat 1971 (March 13th 1914-March 13th 1915), Simla, 1915.
7.
IOR/V/27/560/23/31 (Department of Revenue and Agriculture), Note on a Tour of Inspection in the forests of the Bashahr Forest Division, Punjab Circle, Calcutta, 1905.
8.
Mss Eur E321, Typescript of Unpublished Anthropological Study (dated c. 1930s?) by Sir Herbert William Emerson (1881-1962), Indian Civil Service, Punjab 1905-38, Governor of Punjab 1933-38, on Religion and Custom in the Western Himalaya, Chiefly Relating to the Indian States of Mandi and Bashahr.
9.
‘Abandonment of proposed trial of Futteh Sing’, October 1871, no. 502-04.
10.
‘Futteh Sing's arrest and application for a warrant for his detention at Kangra’, May 1871, no. 674—77.
11.
Dekhang Sonam Chogyal (‘Preliminary Study of the Eon po Monastery Gur gyam’), unpublished manuscript from West Tibet.
12.
Aitchison, C.U. , A Collection of Treaties, Engagements and Sanads Relating to India and the Neighbouring Countries, Vol. I, Calcutta , 1931.
13.
Baden-Powell, B.H. , ‘ Note on the Demarcation of the Forest Area in Districts Containing Hill or Mountain Ranges ’, The Indian Forester, II (3), Jan. 1877, pp. 239–65 .
14.
Baden-Powell, B.H. , ‘ The Political Value of Forest Conservancy ’, The Indian Forester, H(3), Jan. 1877, pp. 280–87 .
15.
Barnes, G. , ‘Memorandum on the District of Bussahir and the Pacification of the Disaffected Portions of its Inhabitants’, in Selections from the Records of the Government of the Punjab and its Dependencies, Vol. V(4), Lahore , 1861, pp. 77–134.
16.
Brandis, D. , Review of the Forest Administration in the Several Provinces under the Government of India, for the year 1879–80, Simla , 1881.
17.
Gazetteer of the Chamba State 1904, Delhi , 1996 (1904).
18.
Gazetteer of the Simla District 1888–89, Calcutta , 1990.
19.
Glover, H.M., ‘Conversion of Blue Pine Forest to Deodar in the Bashahr Division of the Punjab’, Allahabad, Indian Forester [Offprint], 1919.
20.
Hay, W. , ‘ Report on the valley of Spiti: and Facts Collected with a View to a Future Revenue Settlement ’, the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, n. 6, 1850, Calcutta , pp. 429–52 .
21.
Himachal Pradesh District Gazetteers: Kinnaur, Ambala , 1971.
22.
Hutton T., Journal of a Trip through Kunawar, Hungrung, and Spiti, Undertaken in the year 1838, under the Patronage of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, for the Purpose of Determining the Geological Formation of those Districts, offprint at the Bodleian Library, Oxford, (origin unknown).
23.
Pearson G.F. , Report on the Administration of the Forest Department in the Several Provinces under the Government of India, 1870–71, Calcutta, 1872.
24.
Progress Report on Forest Administration in the Punjab for 1908–1909, Lahore, 1909.
25.
Punjab States Gazetteer 1910, Vol. VIII Simla. Hill States: Part A—Bashahr, Lahore , 1911.
26.
Records of the Delhi Residency and Agency, 1807–1857, Lahore, 1911.
27.
Report on the Administration of the Punjab and its Dependencies for the Year 1871–72, Lahore, 1872.
28.
Appadurai, A. , ‘Number in the colonial imagination’, in Carol A. Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer , eds, Orientalism and the Post-colonial Predicament, Philadelphia , 1993, pp. 314–30.
29.
Berti, D. , La Parole des Dieux: Rituels de possession en Himalaya Indien, Paris , 2001.
30.
Bijlawan, R. , Madhya Himalaya Riyasat mem Gramin Janasangharsom ka Itihas, 1815–1949, Purola , 2003.
31.
Chauhan, S. , ‘ Himalayan Hill States and the British: A Study of their Political Relationship and Consequences for the Political Integration of the Western Himalayan Region’, inProceedings of the Indian Historical. Records Commission, Vol. 58, 2003, pp. 73–80 .
32.
Chetwode, P. , ‘An Account of the Western Himalayan Bhunda Ritual in the Sutlej Valley’, SARAS Bulletin, 4, Reading, 1984.
33.
Datta, C.L. , The Raj and the Simla Hill States: Socio-economic Problems, Agrarian Disturbances and Paramountcy, Jullundur , 1997.
34.
Emerson, H.W. , ‘ The Historical Aspects of Some Himalayan Customs ’, Journal of the Panjab Historical Society, Vol. VTH (2), 1921, pp. 185–97 .
35.
Francke, A.H. , Antiquities of Western Tibet, Delhi , 1999 (1914).
36.
Galey, J.-C. , ‘ Hindu Kingship in its Ritual Realm: The Garhwali Configuration ’, Himalaya: Past & Present, Vol. II, 1991–92.
37.
Grove, R. , Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860, Cambridge , 1995.
38.
Guha, R. , The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya, New Delhi , 2001 [1989].
39.
Howell, G. , ‘ Some Notes on Ancient Kulu Polities ’, Journal of the Panjab Historical Society, Vol. VI(2), 1917, pp. 69–81 .
40.
Hutchison, J. , and J.-P. Vogel , History of the Panjab Hill States, Delhi , 1999 [1933].
41.
Joshi, M.P. , ‘ Kumaoni Vamsavalis: Myth and Reality ’, Himalaya: Past and Present, Vol. 1(1), pp. 201–44 .
42.
Joshi, T.R. , ‘ Notes on the Ethnography of the Bashahr State, Simla Hills, Punjab ’, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Vol. VH(9), 1911, pp. 525–613 .
43.
Kanwar, P. , ‘Himachal Society through Imperial Eyes: An Inquiry’, in L. Thakur , ed., Where Mortals and Mountain Gods Meet: Society and Culture in Himachal Pradesh, Shimla , 2002, pp. 117–28.
44.
Kulke, H. , Kings and Cults: State Formation and Legitimation in India and Southeast Asia, New Delhi , 2001 [1993].
45.
McKay, A. , ‘“Tracing Lines upon the Unknown Areas of the Earth”: Reflections on Frederick Jackson Turner and the Indo-Tibetan Frontier’, in S. Agha and E. Kolsky , eds, Fringes of Empire: Peoples, Places, and Spaces at the Margins of British Colonial India (forthcoming).
46.
Petech, L. , ‘ The Tibetan-Ladakhi Moghul War of 1681–83 ’, The Indian Historical Quarterly, Vol. XXHI(3), 1947, pp. 169–99 .
47.
Rajan, R. , ‘Imperial Environmentalism or Environmental Imperialism? European Forestry, Colonial Foresters and the Agendas of Forest Management in British India 1800–1900’, in R. Grove , V Damodaran and S. Sangwan , eds, Nature and the Orient: The Environmental History of South and South-east Asia, New Delhi , 2000 [1998], pp. 324–71.
48.
Ramusack, B. , The Indian Princes and their States, Cambridge , 2004.
49.
Rawat, A. , History of Garhwal 1358–1947: An Erstwhile Kingdom in the Himalayas, New Delhi , 1989.
50.
Riaboff, I , ‘ Ethnonymy in a Multiethnic Context: A Note on Kinnaur ’, European Bulletin of Himalayan Research, Vol. 28, Spring2005, pp. 43–53 .
51.
Richardson, H. , ‘Armenians in India and Tibet’, in M. Aris , ed., High Peaks, Pure Earth: Collected Writings on Tibetan History and Culture, London , 1998, pp. 462–67.
52.
Rivzi, J. , Trans’-Himalayan Caravans: Merchant Princes and Peasant Traders in Ladakh, New Delhi , 1999.
53.
Saklani, A. , History of a Himalayan Princely State: Change, Conflicts and Awakening an Interpretative History of Princely State of Tehri Garhwal, 1815–1949), Delhi , 1987.
54.
Sax, W. , Dancing the Self: Personhood and Performance in the Pandav Lila of Garhwal, New York , 2002.
55.
Sax, W. , ‘A Divine Identity-Crisis’, in Köpping, K.-P. , Leistle, B . and Rudolph, M. eds, Ritual, and Identity: Performative Practices as Effective Transformations of Social. Reality?, forthcoming.
56.
Sharma, A. , An American in Khadi: the Definitive Biography of Satyananda Stokes, New Delhi , 1999.
Sherring, C. , Western Tibet and the British Borderland, London , 1906.
60.
Singh, A. , Tavārīkh va Jugrāfiyā Riyāsat Bilāspur Kahlūr, Shimla undated reprint of the 1935 original.
61.
Singh, C. , ‘The Dhoom in Himachal Pradesh: Community Consciousness, Peasant Resistance or Political Intrigue’, in Laxman S.Thakur , ed., Where Mortals and Mountain Gods Meet: Society and Culture in Himachal Pradesh, Shimla , 2002, pp. 107–16.
62.
Singh, J. , Banks, Gods and Government: Institutional and Informal Credit Structure in a Remote and Tribal Indian District (Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh), 1960–1985, Stuttgart , 1989.
63.
Snehi, Y. , ‘ Conjugality, Sexuality and Shastras: Debate on the Abolition of Reet in Colonial Himachal Pradesh ’, Indian Economic Social History Review, vol. 43(2), 2006, pp. 163–97 .
64.
van Spengen, W. , Tibetan Border Worlds: A Geo-historical Analysis of Trade and Traders, Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam , 1992.
65.
Sukhdev, Singh Charak , ‘Extracts from General Zorawar Singh’, in Alex McKay , ed., The History of Tibet, Vol. II, London , 2003, pp. 748–67.
66.
Sutherland, P. , Traveling Gods and Government by Deity: An Ethnohistory of Power, Representation and Agency in west Himalayan Polity, D. Phil thesis, Oxford , 1998.
67.
Sutherland, P. , ‘Very Little Kingdoms: The Calendrical Order of West Himalayan HinduPolity’, in G. Berkemer and M. Frenz , eds, Sharing Sovereignty—Royalty on a Small Scale. The Little Kingdom in South Asia, Berlin , 2003, pp. 31–61.
68.
Sutherland, P. , ‘ Local Representations of History and the History of Local Representation: Timescapes of Theistic Agency in the Western Himalayas ’, European Bulletin of'Himalayan Research, 25/26 (Double Issue on ‘Representing Local Histories in the Himalayas’, edited by Martin Gaenszle), 2004, pp. 80–118 .
69.
Sutherland, P. , ‘ T(r)opologies of Rule (Raj): Ritual Sovereignty and Theistic Subjection ’, European Bulletin of Himalayan Research, Vol. 29–30, Summer2006, pp. 82–119 .
70.
Thakur, L. , Buddhism in the Western Himalaya: A Study of the Tabo Monastery, Delhi , 1999.
71.
Tobdan , Kullu: A Study in History, Delhi , 2000.
72.
Tucker, R. , ‘Non-Timber Forest Products Policy in the Western Himalayas under British Rule’, in R. Grove , V Damodaran and S. Sangwan , eds, Nature and the Orient: The Environmental History of South and South-east Asia, New Delhi , 2000 [1998], pp. 459–83.
73.
Vasa, S. , ‘Community Forest Management: Historical Legacy of Himachal Pradesh’, in Laxman S. Thakur , ed., Where Mortals and Mountain Gods Meet: Society and Culture in Himachal Pradesh, Shimla , 2002, pp. 30–48.
74.
Washbrook, D. , ‘India 1818–1860: The Two Faces of Colonialism’, in A. Porter , ed., The Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century, Oxford , 1999, pp. 395–422.
75.
Webber, T. , The Forests of Upper India and their Inhabitants, London , 1902.
