Traditional work satisfaction research is criticized for its personalistic approach in conceptualization and measurement. Its results are doubted because of the artificially high proportions of satisfied. In order to overcome some of these shortcomings, the extended model of different forms of work satisfaction originally proposed by Bruggemann (1974) is validated. Six forms of work satisfaction (progressive, stabilized, resigned satisfaction; constructive, fixated, resigned dissatisfaction) are derived from the constellation of four constituent variables: comparison of the actual work situation and personal aspirations, global satisfaction, changes in level of aspiration, controllability at work. Results from semistructured interviews, a free Q-sort, and a questionnaire for differentiating forms of work satisfaction for 46 nurses provide support for the model. Various methods proved useful in accessing particular aspects of the underlying cognitive and evaluative processes in the formation of different forms of work satisfaction. Implications for personnel management and studies in organizational behavior (performance, intervention strategies) are discussed.
ADAMS, J. S.Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology1963, 67, 422-436.
2.
ARVEY, R. D., BOUCHARD, T. J., SEGAL, N. L. & ABRAHAM, L. M.Job satisfaction. Environmental and genetic components. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74, 187-192.
3.
ARVEY, R. D., CARTER, G. W., & BUERKLEY, D. K.Job satisfaction: Dispositional and situational influences. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 6). Chichester: Wiley, 1991, pp. 359-384.
4.
BACHARACH, S. B.Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluationAcademy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 496-515.
5.
BLOCK, J.Advancing the psychology of personality: Paradigmatic shift or improving the quality of research? In D. Magnusson and N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. New York: Wiley, 1977, pp. 37-63.
6.
BRUGGEMANN, A.Zur Unterscheidung verschiedener Formen von 'Arbeitszufriedenheit" [The differentiation of different forms of "work satisfaction"]. Arbeit und Leistung, 1974, 28, 281-284.
7.
BRUGGEMANN, A.Zur empirischen Untersuchung verschiedener Formen der Arbeitszu-friedenheit [An empirical investigation of different forms of work satisfaction]. Zeitschrift flier Arbeiiswissenschaft, 1976, 30, 71-74.
8.
BUNZ, A. R., JANSEN, R., & SCHACHT K.Qualitat des Arbeitslebens. Soziale Kennziffern zur Arbeitszufriedenheit und Berufschancen [Quality of working life. Social parameters on work satisfaction and career options]. Bonn: Forschungsbericht des Bundesministeriums fuer Arbeit und Sozialordnung, 1973.
9.
BUSSING, A.Struktur und Dynamik von Arbeitszufriedenheit: Konzeptuelle und methodische Ueberlegungen zu einer Untersuchung verschiedener Formen von Arbeitszufriedenheit [Structure and dynamics of work satisfaction: Conceptual and methodical reflections for investigating different forms of work satisfaction]. In L. Fischer (Ed.), Arbeitszufrieden-heit. Beitrage zur Organisationspsychologie 5 [Job satisfaction. Contributions to organisational psychology 5]. Gottingen: Hogrefe, 1991, pp. 85-114.
10.
BUSSING, A.A dynamic view of job satisfaction in psychiatric nurses in Germany. Work & Stress, 1992, 6, 239-259.
11.
BUSSING, A.Work and leisure in health care. A study of subjective concepts. In M. Hagberg, F Hofmann, U. Sto Bel, and G. Westlander (Eds.), Occupational health for health care workers. Landsberg a.L.: Ecomed, 1995, pp. 12-17.
12.
BUSSING, A.Motivation and satisfaction. In M. Warner (Ed.), International encyclopedia of business and management. (Vol. 4). London: Thomson Business Press, 1996, pp. 3548-3559.
13.
BUSSING, A.Stability and change in different forms of work satisfaction over a period of six years. Muenchen: Technical University, Chair of Psychology. Forthcoming.
14.
BUSSING, A. & BISSELS, T.Problem solving behaviuor in different forms of work satisfaction: An explorative study. Muenchen: Technical University, Chair of Psychology. Forthcoming.
15.
COTTON, J. L.Employee involvement. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 11). Chichester: Wiley, 1996, pp. 219-242.
16.
CRANNY, C. J., SMITH, P. C. & STONE, E. F. (Eds.). Job satisfaction: How people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance. New York: Lexington, 1992.
17.
FISCHER, L. (Ed.). Arbeitszufriedenheit [Work satisfaction]. Beitrage zur Organisationspsychologit' 5. Stuttgart: Verlag fuer Angewandte Psychologie, 1991.
18.
FRENCH, J. R. P., RODGERS, W. L., & COBB, S.Adjustment as person-environment fit. In G. Coelho, D. Hamburg, and J. C. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
19.
FRESE, M., & ZAPF, D.Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, and L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1994, pp. 271-340.
20.
GANSTER, D. C., & FUSILIER, M. R.Control in the workplace. In C. L. Cooper and I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Chichester: Wiley, 1989, pp. 235-280.
21.
GRIFFIN, R. W., & BATEMAN, T. S.Job satisfaction and organizational commitment. In C. L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. London: Wiley, 1986, pp. 157-188.
22.
HACKER, W.Arbeitspsychologie. Psychische regulation von arbeitstatigkeiten [Work psychology. Psychological regulation of work tasks]. Bern: Huber, 1986.
23.
HACKMAN, J. R.Tasks and task performance in research on stress. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), Social and psychological factors in stress. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970, pp. 202-237.
24.
HENNE, D. L., & LOCKE, E. A.Job dissatisfaction: What are the consequences?International Journal of Psychology, 1985, 20221-240.
25.
IAFFALDANO, M. T., & MUCHINSKY, P. M.Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1985, 97, 251-273.
26.
KANFER, R.Work motivation: New directions in theory and research. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 7). Chichester: Wiley, 1992, pp. 1-53.
27.
KLEINBECK, U., QUAST H.-H., THIERRY, H., & HACKER, H. (Eds.). Work motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990.
28.
LACHENBRUCH, P. A. (1975). Discriminant analysis. London: Hafner, 1975.
29.
LAZARUS, R. S., & FOLKMAN, S.Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer, 1984.
30.
LAZARUS, R. S., & LAUNIER, R.Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In L. A. Pervin and M. Lewis (Eds.), Perspectives in interactional psychology. New York: Plenum, 1978, pp. 287-327.
31.
LEVIN, I., & STOKES, J. P.Dispositional approach to job satisfaction: Role of negative affectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74, 752-758.
32.
LEWIN, K., DEMBO, T., FESTINGER, L., & SEARS, P. S.Level of aspiration. In J. McHunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (Vol.1). New York: Ronald Press, 1944, pp. 333-378.
33.
LOCKE, E. A.The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley, 1976, pp. 1297-1351.
34.
LOCKE, E. A.Job satisfaction. In M. Gruneberg and T Wall (Eds.), Social psychology and organizational behaviorChichester: Wiley, 1984, pp. 93-118.
35.
LOCKE, E. A., & HENNE, D.Work motivation theories. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1). Chichester: Wiley, 1986, pp. 1-35.
36.
MILES, M. B., & HUBERMAN, A. M.Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984.
37.
MINSEL, W. R., & HEINZ, M.Das Q-Sort-Verfahren [The Q-sort procedure]. In H. Feger and J. Bredenkamp (Eds.) Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie. Enzyklopadie der Psychologie (B, I, 2) [Research methods in psychology. Encyclopedia of psychology], Gottingen: Hogrefe, 1983, pp. 135-153.
38.
MORSE, N. C.Satisfaction in the white-collar job. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1953.
39.
NECOWITZ, L. B., & ROZNOWSKI, M.Negative affectivity and job satisfaction-cognitive processes underlying the relationship and effects on employee behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1994, 45, 270-294.
40.
NICHOLSON, N.A theory of work role transitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29, 172-191.
41.
NICHOLSON, N.Towards a new agenda for work and personality: Traits, self-identity, "Strong" interactionism, and change-Guest editor's introduction to "Work and Personality."Applied Psychology: An Intemational Review, 1996, 45189-205.
42.
NORD, W. R.Job satisfaction reconsidered. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 1026-1035.
43.
O'REILLY III, C. A.Organizational behavior: Where wéve been, where wére going. Annual Review of Psychology, 1991, 42.427-458.
44.
PARKER, L. E.When to fix it and when to leave: Relationships among perceived control, self-efficacy, dissent, and exit. Jourmal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78949-959.
45.
PORTER, L. W., & LAWLER, E. E.Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood: Irwin, 1969.
46.
RUSBULT C.E., FARRELL, D., ROGERS, G. & MAINOUS, A. G.Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31, 599-627.
47.
SAUTER, S. L., HURRELL, J. J., & COOPER, C. L. (Eds.). Job control and worker health. Chichester: Wiley, 1989.
48.
SCHNEIDER, B.Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 1985, 36, 573-611.
49.
SCHWAB, D. P., & CUMMINGS, L. L.Theories of performance and satisfaction. Industrial Relations, 1970, 9, 408-430.
50.
SEMMER, N., & SCHALLBERGER, U.Selection, socialisation, and mutual adaptation: Resolving discrepancies between people and work. Applied Psychology: An Intemational Review, 1996, 45, 263-288.
51.
SIX, B., & ECKES, A.Die Korrelation zwischen Arbeitszufriedenheit und Arbeitsleistung: Ergebnisse einer Meta-Analyse [The correlation between work satisfaction and performance: results of a meta-analysis]. In L. Fischer (Ed.), Arbeitszlfriedenheit [Job satisfaction]. Gottingen: Hogrefe, 1991, pp. 21-45.
52.
SIX, B., & KLEINBECK, U.Arbeitsmotivation und Arbeitszufriedenheit [Work motivation and satisfaction]. In E. Roth (Ed.), Enzyklopadie der Psychologie, Band Organisationspsychologie [Encyclopedia of psychology]. Gottingen: Hogrefe, 1989, pp. 348-398.
53.
STAW, B. W.Organizational behavior: A review and reformulation of the field's outcome variables. Annual Review of Psychology, 1984, 35, 627-666.
54.
STAW, B. M., & ROSS, J.Stability in the midst of change: A dispositional approach to job attitudes. Jourmal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70, 469-480.
55.
STAW, B. M., BELL, N. E., & CLAUSEN, J. A.The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 56-77.
56.
STOREY, J. (Ed.). Human resource management-a critical text. London: Routledge, 1995.
57.
SUTTON, R. I., & STAW, B. M.What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995. 40, 371-384.
58.
SZILAGYI, A. D., & WALLACE, M. J.Organizational behavior and performance. Glenview, IL: Scott & Co., 1983.
59.
THIERRY, H., & KOOPMAN-IWEMA, A. M.Motivation and satisfaction. In P J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry, P J. Willems, and C. J. de Wolff (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology (Vol. 1). Chichester: Wiley, 1984, pp. 131-174.
60.
WALL, T. D., JACKSON, P. R., & MULLARKEY, S.Further evidence on some new measures of job control, cognitive demand and production responsibility. Joumral of Organizational Behavior, 1995, 16431-456.
61.
WEAVER, Ch. V.Job satisfaction in the United States in the 1970. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 364-367.
