This paper tests three hypotheses on who gets more support from his or her work organization: (1) The validation hypothesis predicts that employees with greater social support from their co-workers and supervisors receive more organizational support, because their support validates or legitimizes organizational support; (2) the positive affectivity hypothesis predicts that employees high on positive affect receive more organizational support, because they are more likable; and (3) the moderation hypothesis predicts that positive affect and social support do not generate organizational support independently, but each acts on the other to affect organizational support. An assessment of the hypotheses over a sample of 1882 hospital employees in Korea provided strong support for the validation hypothesis and partial support for the moderation hypothesis. Contrary to the positive affectivity hypothesis, employees' good disposition in itself works against the bringing forth of relevant organizational support, net of support from their supervisors and co-workers. Additional findings related to the unique features of the current hospital employees in Korea are also reported. Finally, we discuss cross-cultural research implications of the study in more detail.
AGO, A. O., MUELLER, C., & PRICE, J.Determinants of employee job satisfaction: An empirical test of a causal model. Human Relations, 1993, 46, 1007-1027.
2.
ALLPORT G.Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 1996, 21, 1-10.
3.
ANDERSON, J. G.Stress and burnout among nurses: A social network approach. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1991, 6, 251-272.
4.
BENTLER, P. M. & BONETT, D. G.Significant test and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88, 558-603.
5.
BLOCK, J.The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1978.
6.
BOLLEN, K.Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
7.
BOWERS, K.Situationism in psychology: An analysis and critique. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 307-336.
8.
BYRNE, D., CLORE, G. L., & SMEATON, G.The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect anything. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 1167-1170.
9.
CHA, J.Aspects of individualism and collectivism in Korea. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, and G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism. Sage Publications, 1994.
10.
CHATMAN, J. A.Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-or-ganization fit. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14333-349.
11.
CONDON, J. W., & CRANO, W. D.Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54789-797.
12.
DAVIS-BLAKE & PFEFFER, J.Just a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organ-izational research. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14385-400.
13.
DORNBUSCH, S. M., & SCOTT, W. R.Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Josey-Bass, 1975.
14.
EISENBERGER, R., HUNTINGTON, R., HUTCHISON, S., & SOWA, D.Perceived organ-izational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71, 500-507.
15.
EISENBERGER, R., FASOLO, & DAVIS-LaMASTRO, V.Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75, 51-59.
16.
FISKE, A. P.The cultural relativity of selfish individualism: Anthropological evidence that humans are inherently sociable. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Prosocial behavior. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
17.
FURNHAM, A., & WALSH, J.Consequences of person-organization incongruence: Absen-teeism, frustration, and stress. Journal of Social Psychology, 1991, 131, 187-204.
18.
GEORGE, J. M.Personality, affect and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75, 107-116.
19.
GEORGE, J. M.State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behavior, sales per-formance, and turnover: A group level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 299-307.
20.
GEORGE, J. M. & BRIEF, A. P.Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 1992, 112, 310-329.
21.
HACKMAN, J. R., & LAWLER, E. E.Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55259-286.
22.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 250-279.
23.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
24.
HAINES, V. A., HURLBERT J. S., & ZIMMER, C.Occupational stress, social support, and the buffer hypothesis. Work and Occupations, 1991, 18, 212-235.
25.
HAN, N. An Empirical Study of an Organizational Commitment Model in South Korea. Un-published PhD thesis, University of Iowa, 1992.
26.
HAN, G. & CHOE, S.Effects of family, region, and school network ties on interpersonal intentions and the analysis of network activities in Korea. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, and G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism. Sage Publications, 1994.
27.
HOUSE, J. S.Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981.
28.
ISEN, A. M., & BARON, R. A.Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1991, pp. 1-53.
29.
JORESKOG, K. G., & SORBOM, D.LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIM-PLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, 1993.
30.
KAHN, R. L., WOLFE, D. M., QUINN, R. P., & ROSENTHAL, R. A.Organizational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley, 1964.
31.
KIM, U., TRIANDIS, H. C., KAGITCIBASI, C., CHOI, S., & YOON, G.Individualism and collectivism. Sage Publications, 1994.
32.
LENGERMANN, P. M., & NIEBRUGGE-BRANTLEY, J.Feminist sociological theory: The near-future prospects. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of social theory: The new syntheses. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
33.
LOCKE, E. A.Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1968, 3, 157-189.
34.
LOCKE, E. A.The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, 1976, pp. 1297-1349.
35.
MARSH, H. W., BALLA, J. R., & McDONALD, R. P.Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103391-410.
36.
MATHIEU, J. E., & ZAJAC, D. M.A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 108, 171-194.
37.
MEYER, J. P., & ALLEN, H. J.A longitudinal analysis of the early development and con-sequences of organizational commitment. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science Review, 1987, 19, 199-215.
38.
ORGAN, D. W.Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988.
39.
SELANCIK, G., & PFEFFER, J.An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977, 23, 224-253.
40.
SELANCIK, G., & PFEFFER, J.A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 22, 427-456.
41.
SEO, Y. Job Satisfaction of Hospital Employees: An Empirical Test of a Causal Model in South Korea. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Iowa, 1992.
42.
SHORE, L., & TETRICK, L. E.A construct validity study of the survey of perceived organ-izational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 637-643.
43.
SHORE, L., & WAYNE, S. J.Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuous commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78, 774-780.
44.
SOBEL, M., & BOHRNSTEDT, G. W.Use of null models in evaluating the fit of covariance structure models. Sociological Methodology, 1985, 5, 152-178.
45.
STAW, B. M., & ROSS, J.Stability in the midst of change: A dispositional approach to job attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70, 469-480.
46.
STAW, B. M., SUTT'ON, R., & PELLED, L. H.Employee positive emotion and favorable outcomes at the workplace. Organizational Science, 1994, 5, 51-71.
47.
TETRICK, L. E., & LAROCCO., J. M.Understanding, prediction, and control as moderators of the relationships between perceived stress, satisfaction, and psychological well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72, 538-543.
48.
VIONKUR, A., SCHUL, Y., & CAPLAN, R. D.Determinants of perceived social support: Interpersonal transactions, personal outlook, and transient affective states. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, 1987, 53, 1137-1145.
49.
WALKER, H. A., THOMAS, G. M., & ZELDITCH, M., Jr.Legitimation, endorsement, and stability. Social Forces, 1986, 64, 620-643.
50.
WALLACE, J. E.Organizational and professional commitment in professional and nonpro-fessional organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40, 228-225.
51.
WATSON, D.Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: Their reaction to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 541020-1030.
52.
WATSON, D., & CLARK, L. A.Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 96, 465-490.
53.
WATSON, D., & TELLEGEN, A.Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bul-letin, 1985, 98, 219-235.
54.
WATSON, D., CLARK, L. A., & TELLEGEN, A.Cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood: A Japanese replication and a comparison with U.S. findings. Journal of Person-ality and Social Psychology, 1984, 47, 127-144.
55.
WATSON, D., CLARK, L. A., & TELLEGEN, A.Development and validation of brief meas-ures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54, 1063-1070.
56.
WEISS, H., & ADLER, S.Personality and organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol, 6). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984.
57.
WHITE, R. W.Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 1959, 66, 297-333.
58.
YOON, J., HAN, N., & SEO, Y.Sense of control among hospital employees: An assessment of choice process, empowerment, and buffering hypotheses. Journal of Applied Social Psy-chology, 1996, 26, 686-716.
59.
ZELDITCH, M., Jr., & WALKER., H. A.Legitimacy and the stability of authority. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984.
