Just as the concept "paradigm" energized the human sciences in spite of its many definitions and uses, so now does the concept "reflexive" seem to be of increasing salience, again with many definitions and uses. It is argued that reflexivity, as a fundamental human quality underlies various attempts to understand and intervene in human relationships. By juxtaposing paradigms, reflexivity, and therapeutic progression it is possible to set out several types of reflexivity, some relatively self-contained and others at the edge of our possible "knowledges."
BURRELL, G.The organisation of pleasure. In M. Alvesson and H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992.
4.
BURRELL, G.Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organisation studies. London: Sage, 1996.
5.
CAPLAN, R., & HOLLAND, R.Reconceptualising mental health: a challenge for health promotion. Health Education, 1990, 4910-12.
6.
DOUGLAS, J. D., & JOHNSON, J. M.Existential sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
FAIRBAIRN, W. R. D.Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London: Routledge, 1952.
10.
FLECK, L.Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
11.
GERGEN, K.The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 1985,40(3), 266-275.
12.
GIDDENS, A.The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity, 1984.
13.
GOULDNER, A. W.Coming crisis of western sociology. 1970, pp. xiii-xiii, 489-489.
14.
GOULDNER, A.WFor sociology. London: Allen Lane, 1973.
15.
GRANT, D., & OSWICK, C. (Eds.). Metaphor and organizations. London: Sage, 1996.
16.
HARAWAY, D. J.Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies,1988, 1475-99.
17.
HIRSCHORN, L.The workplace within. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.
18.
HOLLAND, R.Self and social context. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1977.
19.
HOLLAND, R.From perspectives to reflexivity. In H. Bonarius, R. Holland, and S. Rosenberg (Eds.), Personal construct psychology: Recent advances in theory and practice. London: Macmillan, 1981.
20.
HOLLAND, R.Scientificity and psychoanalysis: Insights from the "controversial discussions."International Review of Psychoanalysis, 1990, 17(2), 133-158.
21.
HOLLAND, R. Changing Families and Changing Theorists. Unpublished ms, 1991.
22.
HOLLAND, S.Towards prevention. In S. Ramon & M. G. Giannichedda (Eds.), Psychiatry in transition. London: Pluto, 1988.
23.
HOLLAND, S.Psychotherapy, oppression and social action: Gender, race and class in black women's depression. In R. Perelberg & A. Miller (Eds.), Gender and power in families. London: Routledge, 1990.
24.
HOLLAND, S.Action and interaction in women's mental health and neighbourhood development. In S. Fernando (Ed.), Mental health in a multi-ethnic society: A multi-disciplinary handbook. London: Routledge, 1995.
25.
HOWE, D.An introduction to social work theory. London: Heinemann, 1987.
26.
KELLY, G. A.The psychology of personal constructs (two Vols.). New York: Norton, 1955.
27.
KETS DE VRIES, M. F. R., & Associates. Organizations on the couch. San Fancisco and Oxford: Jossey Bass, 1991.
28.
KUHN, T. S.The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1962.
29.
LAFITTE, P.The person in psychology. London: Routledge, 1957.
30.
LANDAU, M.Political theory and political science. New York: Macmillan, 1972.
31.
LEACH, E.Men, Bishops and apes. Nature, September 1981, 293(3), 19-21.
32.
MacDONALD, G.Defining the goals and raising the issues. In D. R. Trent and C. Reed (Eds.), Promotion of mental health (Vol. 3). Ashford: Avebury, 1992.
33.
MANNHEIM, K.Ideology and utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1936.
34.
MARCUS, G. E.What comes (just) after "post?" The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage, 1994.
35.
MEAD, G. H.Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1934.
36.
MERTON, R. K.The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (Edited and with an introduction by N. W Storer). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
37.
MORGAN, G.Images of organisation. London: Sage, 1986.
38.
MORGAN, G.An afterword: Is there anything more to be said about metaphor? In D. Grant & C. Oswick (Eds.), Metaphor and organizations. London: Sage, 1996.
39.
MULKAY, M.Sociology of science: a sociological pilgrimage. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1990.
40.
ROSALDO, R.Ilongot headhunting, 1883-1974: A study in society and history. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1980.
41.
SCHULTZ, M., & HATCH, M. J.Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(2), 529-557.
42.
SIMPSON, J. A., & WEINER, E. S. C.Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
43.
STAPLEY, L. F.The personality of the organisation. London: Free Association Books, 1996.
44.
TOMM, K.Interventive interviewing: Part II, reflexive questioning as a means to enable selfhealing. Family Process, 1987, 26, 167-184.
45.
WHITTINGTON, C., & HOLLAND, R.Social theory for social work. Social Work Education, 1981, 1(1), 19-26.
46.
WHITTINGTON, C., & HOLLAND, R.A framework for theory in social work. Issues in Social Work Education, 1985, 5(1), 25-50.
47.
WILLMOTT, H.Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organization Studies, 1993, 14(5), 681-719.
48.
WOOLGAR, S. (Ed.), Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage, 1988.
