This paper studies the relatively less explored issue of the actual process of grievance resolution from a political perspective. In a steel plant in India, six grievance cases were analyzed from the filing of a grievance to its final resolution. Cases were reconstructed through semistructured interviews and analyzed from a political perspective. The sources of power of the key actors and their influence tactics vis-A-vis one another were found to determine whether the case would be decided in favor of or against the grievant. The understanding of the dynamics in grievance resolution was enhanced when we analyzed cases as episodes nested in the ongoing political process of the organization. A comprehensive understanding of political behavior required analysis at two levels: the explicit-dealing with apparent behavior; and the implicit-exploring the underlying concerns and intents of the actors often manifested through symbols. Implications of multiple levels of political behavior for institutionalizing due process are discussed.
ALLEN, R. W., MADISON, D. L., PORTER, L. W., RENWICK P. A. & MAYES, B. T.Organizational politics: Tactics and characteristics of its actors. California Management Review, 1979, 22(1), 77-83.
2.
ALLISON, G. T.Essence of decision. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1971.
3.
ALVESSON, M.Organisation: From substance to image. Organisation Studies, 1990, 10373-394.
4.
BACHARACH, S. B., & LAWLER, E. J.Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
5.
BALDRIDGE, J. V.Power and conflict in the university. New York: John Wiley. 1971.
6.
BHATNAGAR, D.Evaluation of managerial influence tactics: A study of Indian bank managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 1993, 1, 3-9.
7.
BRADSHAW-CAMBALL, P.The Impliciation of multiple perspectives on power for organisation development. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 1989, 2531-44.
8.
BRADSHAW-CAMBALL, P., & MURRAY, V. V.Illusions and other games: A trifocal view of organisational politics. Organisation Science, 1991, 2(4), 379-398.
9.
BURAWOY, M.The politics of production: Factory regime under capitalism and socialism. London: Verso, 1985.
CLEGG, S. R.Frameworks of power. London: Sage, 1989. (a)
12.
CLEGG, S. R.Radical revisions: Power, discipline and organizations. Organization Studies, 1989, 1097-115. (b)
13.
DAHL, R. A.The concept of power. Behavioural Science, 1957, 2, 201-205.
14.
DAS, H.Relevance of symbolic interactionist approach in understanding power: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 1988, 25, 251-267.
15.
DUNLOP, J. L.Industrial relation systems. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1958.
16.
EDELMAN, L. B.Legal environments and organizational grievances: The expansion of due process in the American work place. American Journal of Sociology, 1990, 951401-1440.
17.
EDELMAN, L. B.Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organisational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 1992, 97, 1531-1576.
18.
FALBE, C., & YUKL, G.Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combination of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35, 638-652.
19.
FRENCH, J. R. P., & RAVEN, B. H.The Bases of Social Power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1959.
20.
FROST, P. J., & EGRI, C. P.The political process of innovation. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organisational behaviuor (Vol. 13). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990, pp. 229-295.
21.
GOFFMAN, E.The presentation of self in every day life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1959.
22.
GORDON, M. E., & MILLER, S. J.Grievances: A review of research and practice, Personnel Psychology, 37117-146.
23.
GREENBERG, G.Looking fair v/s being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organisational Behaviuor (Vol. 12). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990.
24.
HICKSON, D. J., HININGS, C. R., LEE, C. A., & PENNINGS, J. M.A strategic contingencies theory of intra-organisational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 216-229.
25.
KIPNIS, D., SCHMIDT, S. M., & WILKINSON, I.Inter-organisational influence tactics: Explorations in getting onés way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65440-452.
26.
KLASS, B. D.Managerial decision-making about employee grievances: The impact of the grievants' work history, Personnel Psychology, 1989, 4253-68.
27.
KNIGHT, T. R.Feedback and grievance resolution. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 1986, 39585-598.
28.
KUHN, J. W.Bargaining in grievance settlement. New York: Columbia University Press,1961.
29.
LABIG, C. E., & GREER, C. R.Grievance initiation: A literature survey and suggestions for future research. Journal of Labour Research, 1988, 9, 1-28.
30.
LAWLER, E. J., & BACHARACH, S. B.Political actions and alignments in organisations. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organisation (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983.
31.
LEWIN, D.Theoretical perspectives on the grievance procedure. In R. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Research in labour economics (Suppl. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983, pp. 127-147.
32.
LUKES, S.Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan, 1974.
33.
MESCH, D. J., & DALTON, D. R.Unexpected consequences of improving workplace justice: A six year time series assessment. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 35, 1099-1144.
34.
MEYER, D., & COOKE, W.Economic and political factors in formal grievance resolution. Industrial Relations, 1988, 27, 318-335.
35.
MEYER, J. W., & ROWAN, B.Institutionalised organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 27, 318-335.
36.
MORGAN, G.Images of organizations. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage, 1986.
37.
NG, I., & DASTMALCHIAN, A.Determinants of grievance outcomes: A case study. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 1989, 42, 393-403.
38.
PFEFFER, J.Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing, 1981. (a)
39.
PFEFFER, J.Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 3). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1981. (b)
40.
PORTER, L. W., ALLEN, R. W., & ANGLE, H. L.The politics of upward influence in organizations. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organisational behaviour (Vol. 3). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1981.
41.
RAMASWAMY, E. A.Worker consciousness and trade union response. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1988.
42.
ROSEN, B., & JERDEE, T. H.Effects of employeés sex and threatening versus pleading appeals on managerial evaluations of grievances. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 442-445.
43.
SAYLES, L. R., & STRAUSS, G.The local union. New York: Harcourt Brace and World, 1967.
44.
SHETH, N. R.Our trade unions: An overview. Economic and Political Weekly, 1993, XVII(6), 231-236.
45.
TOWNLEY, B.Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18, 518-545.
