Seven task-oriented teams worked together for between 4 and 6 months on a project. At the end of the task, members were each subject to four task-performance ratings: from self, superior, team-peers, and a consultant who was part of the team. There were fewer than chance differences between the different teams on the congruence measures so the data was combined. While the congruence between self and manager, self and peer, and self and consultant ratings were very low, the manager-peer, manager-consultant, and peer-consultant congruence was overall high. Observable behaviors like forward planning and communication showed overall highest congruence while less observable cognitive variables showed much lower congruence. These results are similar to previous studies in the area. Implications of the use of these ratings in management development are considered.
ARNOLD, J. & DAVEY, K.Self-ratings and superior ratings of graduate employees competence during early career . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 1992, 15, 235-250 .
2.
ASHFORD, S. & TSUI, A.Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness. The role of active feedback seeking . Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 251-280 .
3.
ATWATER, L. , ROUSH, P. , & FISCHTHAL, A.The influence of upward feedback on self- and follower ratings of leadership . Personnel Psychology, 1995, 48, 35-59 .
4.
BASS, B. , & YAMMARINO, F.Congruence of self and others' leadership ratings of naval officers for understanding successful performance . Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1991, 40, 437-454 .
5.
BERGER-GROSS, V.Difference score measure of social perceptions revisited: A comparison of alternative . Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1982, 29, 279-284 .
6.
BLAKELEY, G.The effects of performance rating discrepancies on supervisors and subordinates . Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 1993, 54, 57-80 .
7.
BORMAN, W.The rating of individuals in organizations. An alterative approach . Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1974, 12, 105-124 .
8.
BRACKEN, D.Straight talk about multi-rater feedback . Training and Development, 1994, 48, 44-51 .
9.
CAMPBELL, D. , & FISKE, D.Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait-multi-method matrix . Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81-105 .
10.
CAMPBELL, D. , & LEE, C.Self appraisal in performance evaluation: Development vs. evaluation . Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13, 302-314 .
11.
CHURCH, A.First-rate multi-rater feedback . Training and Development, 1995, 49, 42-43 .
12.
DUNNETTE, K.My hammer or your hammer . Human Resource Management, 1993, 32, 373-389 .
13.
FAHR, J.-L. , DOBBINS, G. , & CHENG, B. D.Cultural relatively in action: A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and US workers . Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44, 129-147 .
14.
FURNHAM, A.Personality at work. London: Routledge , 1994.
15.
FURNHAM, A. , & STRINGFIELD, P.Personality and work performance: Myers-Briggs type indicator correlates of managerial performance in two cultures . Personality and Individual Differences, 1993, 14, 145-153 .
16.
FURNHAM, A. , & STRINGFIELD P.Congruence of self and subordinate ratings of managerial practices as a correlate of superior evaluation . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 1994, 67, 57-67 .
17.
HARRIS, M. , & SCHAUBROECK, J.A meta analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer and peer-supervisor ratings . Personnel Psychology, 1988, 41, 43-61 .
18.
HENEMAN, H.Comparisons of self- and superior-rating of managerial performance . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 638-642 .
19.
HOLZBACH, R.Rater bias in performance rating: Supervisor, self and peer ratings . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 579-588 .
20.
JOHNS, G.Difference score measures of organizational behaviour variable: A critique . Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1981, 27, 443-462 .
21.
LONDON, M. , & BEATTY, R.360° degree feedback as a competitive advantage . Human Resource Management, 1993, 32, 353-372 .
22.
MABE, P. , & WEST, S.Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta analysis . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67, 280-296 .
23.
MAURER, T. , & TARILLA, B.Acceptance of peer upward performance-appraisal systems . Human Resource Management, 1996, 35, 217-241 .
NILSEN, W. , & CAMPBELL, D.Self-observer rating discrepancies . Human Resource Management, 1993, 32, 265-281 .
26.
REILLY, R. , SMITHER, J. , & VASILOPOULOS, N.A longitudinal study of upward feed-back . Personnel Psychology, 1996, 49, 599-612 .
27.
RIGGIO, R. , & COLE, E.Agreement between subordinate and superior ratings of supervisory performance and effects on self and subordinate job satisfaction . Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 1992, 65, 151-158 .
28.
SAAVEDRA, R. , & KWIN, S.Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78, 450-462 .
29.
SHORE, E. , SHORE, L. , & THORNTON, G.Construct validity of self and peer evaluations of performance dimensions in an assessment centre . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992, 77, 42-54 .
30.
SMITHER, J. , WOHLERS, A. , & LONDON, H.A field study of reactions to normative versus individualized upward feedback . Group and Organization Management, 1995, 20, 61-89 .
31.
SOMERS, M. , & BIRNBAUM, D.Assessing self-appraisal of job performance as an evaluation device: Are the poor results a function of method or methodology?Human Relations, 1991, 44, 1081-1091 .
32.
THORNTON, G.Psychometric properties of self-appraisal and job performance . Personnel Psychology, 1980, 33, 263-271 .
33.
TSUI, A.A role set analysis of managerial reputation . Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1984, 34, 64-69 .
34.
TSUI, A. , & BARRY, B.Interpersonal affect and rating errors . Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29, 586-599 .
35.
VECCHIO, R.Self- and supervisor-ratings: A dyadic approach . International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1993, 1, 73-83 .
36.
WOHLERS, A. , HALL, M.-J. , & LONDON, M.Subordinates rating managers: Organisational and demographic correlates of self/subordinate agreement . Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 1993, 66, 263-275 .
37.
WEXLEY, K. , ALEXANDER, R. , GREENWALT J. , & COUCH, M.Attitudinal congruence and similarity as related to interpersonal evaluation in manager subordinate dyads . Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23, 320-330 .
38.
YAMMARINO, F. , & ATWATER, L.Understanding self-perception accuracy: Implications for human resource management . Human Resource Management, 1993, 32, 231-247 .
