Current developments in the sociotechnical framework address a number of vital issues that failed to occupy the high ground in its formative years. These include: (i) the purpose of the systems, to create customer value under social and resource constraints, (ii) the context or external business environment, and (iii) the dynamics of the sociotechnical system. Due attention to the dominant issues of purpose, context, and their dynamics make it more meaningful to speak of sociotechnical business systems (STBS) and organizational learning instead of sociotechnical systems (STS) and individual learning. In STBS each unit in an organization has business responsibilities and goal-based couplings with its environment and focuses on the creation of customer value. The implications of this shift from STS to STBS are discussed and illustrated with current research and two summary case studies.
ADLER, N., HART H., LUNDQVIST, M., & NORRGREN, F.Integration driven product development. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1998. Forthcoming.
2.
BREDBACKA, C.Lifelong learning at ABB network control AB. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Work Life Research, 1995 (in Swedish).
3.
BORJESSON, S.Prerequisites for alternative working hours in an FMS. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1991, 7, 241-274.
4.
COLE, R.A Comparative Perspective on Individual and Organizational Learning in Western and Japanese Industry. Paper presented at the Conference Toward Learning in Working Life. The Swedish Work Environment Fund, November 17-18, Stockholm, Sweden, 1994.
5.
DILL, W. R.Environment as an influence on management autonomy. In J. D. Thompson et al. (Eds.), Comparative studies in administration. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1959.
6.
DOCHERTY, P.Ldroriket: Vagar och vagval i den larande organisationen. Stockholm: Swedish Educational Radio Corporation and Swedish Institute for Work Life Research, 1996.
7.
DOCHERTY, P.Learning at work. Stockholm: Swedish Work Environment Fund, 1994.
8.
DOCHERTY, P., & NYHAN, B.Human competence and business development. London: Springer Verlag. 1997.
9.
DOCHERTY, P., FREDHOLM, E., & SANDBLAD, B.A vision of the branch office in the rural savings bank in the year 2000. Stockholm: IMIT, 1994 (in Swedish).
10.
EHN, P., & FORSS, PLocal planning systems at the Swedish rail maintenance yard at Hagalund. Stockholm: IMIT and Dept. of Informatics, Lund, 1994 (in Swedish).
11.
EIJNATTEN, F. M. VAN. The paradigm that changed the Work Place. Assen: Van Gorum and the Swedish Institute for Work Life, 1993.
12.
ELLEGARD, K., ENGSTROM, T., JONSSON, D., NILSSON, L., & MEDBO, L.Developing unique production and work structuring principles through a creative search and learning process: The Volvo Uddevalla final assembly plant. In P. Docherty and B. Nyhan (Eds.), Human competence and business development. London: Springer Verlag. In press.
13.
FORSLIN. J.The broken line: A Volvo company changes culture: Stockholm: FA Council and Norstedts, 1990 (in Swedish).
14.
FORSLIN, J., & FREDHOLM, E.Reflecting on practice: On organizational learning in Volvo. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Work Life Research, 1995 (in Swedish).
15.
EMERY, F.Personal correspondence to van Eijnatten. In F M. van Eijnatten (Ed.), The paradigm that changed the work place. Assen: Van Gorum and the Swedish Institute for Work Life, 1993.
16.
EMERY, M.Searching * for new directions * in new ways * for new times. Ottawa: Ontario Ministry of Labor and Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre, 1982.
17.
FRIS, S.Local planning systems at the Avesta Foundary. Lund: Dept. of Informatics, University of Lund, 1993 (in Swedish).
18.
HAMEL, G., & PRAHALAD, C. K.Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
19.
HOWARD, R.The learning imperative. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1990.
20.
HUSELID, M. A.The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(3), 635-672.
21.
HORTE, S. A. (Ed.). The learning organization. LuleA: Luleg University of Technology, 1996.
22.
HORTE, S. A.The development project at the Dill Factory at SKF-Norden. Gothenburg: IMIT1987.
23.
HORTE, S. A., DOCHERTY, P., & TUNALV, C.Key activities and key competences in a knowledge-based organization. In S. A. Horte (Ed.), The learning organization.Lulek: Lulet University of Technology, 1996.
24.
KAPLAN, R. S. & NORTON, D. P.The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
25.
KARLSSON, U. Alternative Production Systems to Line Production. Ph.D. thesis, Inst. of Sociology, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, 1979 (in Swedish).
26.
LILLRANK, P.Is T-50 the Swedish answer to Japanese management development?Stockholm: Swedish Work Environment Fund, Program for Learning Organisations, 1994.
27.
LUNDQUIST, M. Organising Product Development. Ph.D. dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 1994.
28.
MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A.Organizations. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
29.
MARKING, C.A Learning opportunity on the shopfloor at AB Bygg och Transportekonomi. In P. Docherty and B. Nyhan (Eds.), Human competence and business development. London: Springer Verlag, 1997.
30.
MISIEIL, S., & LAWLER, M.From workers to business partners-A response to crisis at Bord nd Mona. In P Docherty and B. Nyhan (Eds.), Human competence and business development. London: Springer Verlag. Forthcoming.
31.
MUMFORD, E., & BANKS O.The computer and the clerk. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967.
32.
MARENSSON, L.New technology and new organization at Asea Distribution. Stockholm: Arbetsmiljolaboratoriet, Royal Institute of Technology, 1995 (In Swedish).
33.
NORRGREN, F.Designing and implementing a software factory-a case study from telecommunications. R&D Management, 1990, 20(3), 263-275.
34.
NORRGREN, F.The sociotechnical approach. In T Engstrom et al. (Eds.), Working life in development. Gothenburg: The Work Science Collegiate, 1990 (in Swedish).
35.
PASMORE, W. A.Designing effective organizations: The sociotechnical systems perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988.
36.
PURSER, R. E., & PASMORE, W. A.Organizing for learning. In W A. Pasmore and R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organization change and development (Vol. 6). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1992.
37.
RASMUSSON, J.Information processing and human-machine interaction. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1986.
38.
RENDAHL, J. E., HART, H., LAWLER, E. E., III, LEDFORD, G. E., Jr., & NORRGREN, F.Changing and leading tomorrow's work. Stockholm: Vis Strategi AB, 1995 (in Swedish).
39.
REHNSTROM, P., & MALMSTROM, L.Competence for quality: The technical revolution at Ldngesjonas Papernill. Stockholm: Arbetsmiljofonden, 1987 (in Swedish).
40.
ROBERTS, H. J. E. Accountability & Responsibility. PhD thesis, University of Limberg, Maastricht, 1993.
41.
SCHUMANN, M.Changing concepts of work and qualifications. In M. Warner, W Wobbe, and P Brodner (Eds.), New technology and manufacturing management. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons, 1992.
42.
STJERNBERG, T.Organisational development and new technology at Boliden Metall, Ronnskdrsvik. Stockholm: Arbetsmiljofonden, 1987 (in Swedish).
43.
STOREY, J.The like-up of Human Resource Management by Mainstream Companies. Human Resource Management: Implications for Teaching, Theory and Research in Industrial Relations, 9th World Congress IIRA, September 3, 1992, pp. 142-161.
44.
STYMNE, B. A., CARLSSON, T., & HAGGLUND, P.International transfer of organizational innovation. Stockholm: IMIT, 1996.
45.
TAYLOR, J. C., & FELTEN, D. F.Performance by Design: Sociotechnical Systems in North America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993.
46.
THOMPSON, J. D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
47.
TUNALV, C. Manufacturing Strategies in Swedish Manufacturing Industry. PhD dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg, 1991.
48.
VOLPERT, W.What Working and Learning Conditions Are Conducive to Human Development?Paper to the Swedish-German Workshop on the Humanization of Working Life. Stockholm, December 1989.
49.
WALTON, R.From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, March April, 1985, 77-84.
50.
WELLINS, R. S., BYHAM, W. C., & WILSON, J. M.Empowered Teams: Creating Self-Directed Work Groups That Improve Quality, Productivity, and Participation. Development Dimensions International, Association for Quality and Participation, Industry Week, Survey Report, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
51.
ZWAAN, Ad H. van DER. Engineering the work organization. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1994.
