A shift away from "up-or-out," the conventional promotion system in professional service firms, has been explained as part of a wider set of changes in internal labor market arrangements and management methods. This is investigated empirically in a sample of large partnerships in one profession. Up-or-out was used by less than one-third of the sample of firms but is common among the largest firms. Internal reforms to the professional firm do not fully explain its rarity; up-or-out appears to be adaptable to new forms of management and internal labor market policies. This raises a number of questions about the utility of theoretical explanations of how professional service firms work or are changing.
ABBOTT, A.The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
2.
BADEN-FULLER, C., & BATESON, J.Promotion strategies for hierarchically organised professional service firms: Is 'up or out' always the best?International Journal of Senivce Industry Management, 1991, 1(3), 62-78.
3.
BAKER, G., JENSEN, M., & MURPHY, K.Compensation and incentives: Practice vs. theory. Journal of Finance, 1988, 63(3), 593-616.
4.
BOWLES, R.The structure of the legal profession in England and Wales. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1993, 10(1), 18-33.
5.
COOPER, D., HININGS, C. R., GREENWOOD, R., & BROWN, J.Sedimentation and Transformation in Organisational Change: The Case of Canadian Law Firms. Procedures of Conference on Change in Knowledge-Based Organisations, University of Alberta, 1995.
6.
DIMAGGIO, P.Introduction. In W. W. Powell, and P. J. DiMaggio, (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
7.
FAMA, E., & JENSEN, M.Separation of ownership & control. Journal of Law and Economics1983, xxvi, 301-325.
8.
FLOOD, J.Megalaw in the UK: Professionalism or Corporatism?A preliminary report Indiana Law Journal1989, 64569-591.
9.
FREIDSON, E.Professional powers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
10.
GALANTER, M.Mega-law and mega-lawyering in the contemporary United States In R. Dingwall, and P. Lewis, (Eds.), The sociology of the professions: Lawyers, doctors and others. London: Macmillan, 1983, pp. 167-171.
11.
GALANTER, M., & PALAY, T.Why the big get bigger: The promotion-to-partner tournament and the growth of large law firms. Virginia Law Review. 1990, 76, 747-811.
12.
GALANTER, M., & PALAY T.Tournament of Lawyers: The growth and transformation of the large law firmChicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
13.
GILSON, R., & MNOOKIN, R.Sharing among the human capitalists: An economic inquiry into the corporate law firm and how partners split profits. Stanford Law Review, 1985, 37, 313-392.
14.
GILSON, R., & MNOOKIN, R.Coming of age in a corporate law firm: The economics of associate career patterns. Stanford Law Review, 1989, 41, 567-595.
15.
GILSON, R., & MNOOKIN, R.The implicit contract for corporate law firm associates: ex post opportunism and ex ante bonding. In M. Aoki et al. (Eds.) The Firm as a nexus of treaties. London: Sage, 1990, pp. 209-236.
16.
GREENWOOD, R., HININGS, C. R., & BROWN, J.'P2 form' strategic management: Corporate practices in professional partnerships. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33(4), 725-755.
17.
GREENWOOD, R., HININGS, C. R., & BROWN, J.Merging professional service firms. Organization Science, 1994.
18.
HALL, R.Organizations: Structures, processes and outcomes. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1987.
19.
HALL, R.Professionalization and bureaucratizationAmerican Sociological Review, 1968, 33(Feb.), 92-104.
20.
HEINZ, J., & LAUMANN, E.Chicago Lawyers: The social structure of the bar. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1994.
21.
HEYDEBRAND, W.Autonomy, Complexity and non-bureaucratic coordination in professional organization. Journal of Management Studies, 1973, 28(4), 375-393.
22.
HININGS, C. R., BROWN, J., & GREENWOOD, R.Change in an autonomous professional organization. Journal of Management Studies, 1991, 28(4), 375-393.
23.
MALOS, S. B., & CAMPION, M. A.An options-based model of career mobility in professional service firms. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20, 611-645.
24.
MAISTER, D.Managing the professional service firm. Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
25.
NELSON, R.Partners with power: The social transformation of the large law firm, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
26.
NELSON, R. L.Of tournaments and transformations: Explaining the growth of large law firms. Wisconsin Law Review, 1992, 38, 733-750.
27.
PIERCE, J., RUBENFELD, S., & MORGAN, S.Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(1), 121-144.
28.
ROSENBAUM, J. E.Organization career systems and employee misperceptions. In M. B. Arthur et al. (Eds.), Handbook of career theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 329-353.
29.
SMFGEL, E.The Wall Street lawyer: Professional organization man?Glencoe: Free Press, 1969.
STARBUCK, W. H., Keeping a butterfly and an elephant in a house of cards: the elements of exceptional success. Journal of Management Studies, 1993, 30(6), 885-922.
32.
TOLBERT, P., & STERN, R.Organizations of professionals: Governance structures in large law firms. In Barley and Tolbert (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 8). New York: JAI Press, 1991, pp. 97-118.
33.
WEBER, M.Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
34.
WHOLEY, D.Determinants of firm internal labour markets in large law firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 30, 318-335.
