BURT, R. S.Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
2.
CANNELLA, A., & PAETZOLD, R.Pfeffer's barriers to the advancement of organizational science: A rejoinder. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(2), 331-341.
3.
DONALDSON, L.In defense of organizational theory: A reply to critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
4.
DONALDSON, L.For positive organization theory: Proving the hard core. London: Sage, 1996.
5.
DONALDSON, L.A positivist alternative to the structure-action approach. Organization Studies, 1997, 18(1), 77-92.
6.
HANNAN, M. T, & CARROLL, G.Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, legitimation, and competition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
7.
HILMER, F, & DONALDSON, L.Management redeemed: Debunking the fads that undermine our corporations. New York: Free Press, 1996.
8.
MEYER, A. D., TSUI, A. S., & HININGS, C. R.Guest co-editors' introduction: Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Joumal, 1993, 36(6), 1175-1195.
9.
PERROW, C.Pfeffer slips. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(2), 191-194.
10.
PFEFFER, J.Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18(4), 599-620.
11.
SCHULTZ, M., & HATCH, M. J.Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(2), 529-557.
