Population ecologists suggest that inertial pressures make it difficult for organizations to adapt their strategies and structures in response to environmental changes. One way in which organizations may attempt to overcome these inertial tendencies is by selecting executive successors with different career specializations than their predecessors, which may enable them to better cope with changing environmental contingencies. The present study examined the relationship between the previous CEO's career specialization, the corporate strategy in place at the time of the succession event, and the career specialization of the new CEO from 1981-1990. The results suggest that organizations often chose successors with different career specializations than their predecessors, and that previous corporate strategy was a relatively poor predictor of successors' specializations. These results differ from earlier research findings concerning executive succession between 1957-1981. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed, and the implications for future research are considered.
ALLEN, M. P., & PANIAN, S. K.Power, performance, and succession in the large corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27, 538-547.
2.
ALLEN, M. P., PANIAN, S. K., & LOTZ, R. E.Managerial succession and organizational performance: A recalcitrant problem revisited. Administrative Science Quartery, 1979, 24, 167-180.
3.
BETTIS, R. A.Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 1981, 21, 379-393.
4.
BISHOP, Y. M. M., FIENBERG, S. E., & HOLLAND, P. W.Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1975.
5.
BOEKER, W, & GOODSTEIN, J.Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 805-826.
6.
CANNELLA, A., LUBATKIN, M., & DAPOUCH, M.Antecedents of executive selection: Additional empirical evidence. Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Miami, Florida, 1991, pp, 11-15.
7.
CARROLL, G. R.Organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 1984, 10, 71-93.
8.
CHAGANTI, R., & SAMBHARYA, R.Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management. Strategic Management Journal, 1987, 8, 393-401.
9.
CHANDLER, A. D.Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of American enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1962.
10.
CHILD, J.Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 1972, 6, 1-22.
11.
CYERT, R. M., & MARCH, J. G.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
12.
DALTON, D. R., & KESNER, I. F.Inside/outside succession and organizational size: The pragmatics of executive succession. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26, 736-742.
13.
DALTON, D. R., & KESNER, I. F.Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28, 749-762.
14.
DAVIDSON, W. N. III, WORRELL, D. L., & CHENG, L.Key Executive Succession and Stockholder Wealth: The influence of successor's origin, position, and age. Journal of Management, 1990, 16, 647-664.
15.
EVERITT B. S.The analysis of contingency tables. London: Halsted Press, 1977.
16.
FINKELSTEIN, S., & HAMBRICK, D. C.Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35, 484-503.
17.
FREDRICKSON, J. W, HAMBRICK, D. C., & BAUMRIN, S.A model of CEO dismissal. Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13(2), 255-270.
18.
FRIEDMAN, S. D.Succession systems in large corporations: Characteristics and correlates of performance. Human Resource Management, 1986, 25, 191-213.
19.
FRIEDMAN, S. D.Why hire from within? Causes and consequences of internal promotion systems. Proceedings of the Academy of Management National Meeting, Miami, Florida, 1991, pp. 272-276.
20.
FRIEDMAN, S. D., & SINGH, H.CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32, 718-744.
21.
GAMSON, W. A., & SCOTCH, N. A.Scapegoating in baseball. American Journal of Sociology, 1964, 70, 69-72.
22.
GOODSTEIN, J., & BOEKER, W.Turbulence at the top: A new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 306-330.
23.
GOULDNER, A. WPatterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press, 1954.
24.
GRIMM, C. M., & SMITH, K. G.The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers: An Empirical Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, 1986.
25.
GRIMM, C. M., & SMITH, K. G.Research notes and communications management and organizational change: A note on the railroad industry. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12, 557-562.
26.
GUEST, R.Managerial succession in complex organizations. American Joumal of Sociology, 1962, 68, 47-64.
27.
GUPTA, A. K.Contingency linkages between strategy and general manager characteristics: a conceptual examination. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 399-412.
28.
GUPTA, A. K.Contingency perspectives on strategic leadership: Current knowledge and future research direction. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988, pp. 147-178.
29.
GUPTA, A. K., & GOVINDARAJAN V.Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 1984, 27, 25-41.
30.
GUTHRIE, J. P., & DATTA, D. K.Executive selection decisions: Contextual determinants of CEO characteristics, 1992. Paper presented at the National Academy Meeting, Las Vegas, 1992.
31.
GUTHRIE, J. P, & OLIAN, J. D.Does context affect staffing decisions? The case of general managers. Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44, 263-292.
32.
HAGER, B., DRISCOLL L., WEBER, J., & McWILLIAMS, G.CEO wanted: No insiders, please. Business Week, August 12, 1991, pp. 44-45.
33.
HAMBRICK, D. C.Operationalizing the concept of business-level strategy in research. Academy of Management Review, 1980, 5, 567-575.
34.
HAMBRICK, D. C., & MASON, P A.Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 193-206.
35.
HANNAN, M. T., & FREEMAN, J.The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82, 929-964.
36.
HANNAN, M. T, & FREEMAN, J.Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 1984, 49, 149-164.
37.
HAVEMEN, H. A.Ghosts of managers past: Managerial succession and organizational mortality. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36, 864-881.
38.
HAYES, R. H., & ABERNATHY, W. J.Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review, 1980, 58(4), 67-77.
39.
HELMICH, D. L.Organizational growth and succession patterns. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17, 771-775.
40.
HELMICH, D. L., & BROWN, W. B.Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 371-381.
41.
HITT, M. A., IRELAND, R. D., & PALIA, K. A.Industrial firms' grand strategy and functional importance: Moderating effects of technology and uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 265-298.
42.
KANTER, R.Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
43.
KELLY, D., & AMBURGEY, T. L.Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 591-612.
44.
LAWRENCE, P R., & DYER, D.Renewing American industry. New York: Free Press, 1983.
45.
LIEBERSON, S., & O'CONNOR, J. F.Leadership and organizational performance: A study of large corporations. American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 117-130.
46.
LUBATKIN, M. H., CHUNG, K. H., ROGERS, R. C., & OWERS, J. E.Stockholder reactions to CEO changes in large corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32, 47-68.
47.
MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
48.
MICHEL, J. G., & HAMBRICK, D. C.Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35(1), 9-37.
49.
MILLER, D.Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 1991, 37(1), 34-52.
50.
MILLS, J.The new competitors: A report on American managers. New York: Wiley, 1985.
51.
MONTGOMERY, C. A.The measurement of firm diversification: Some new empirical evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 299-307.
52.
NADLER, D. A., & TUSHMAN, M. L.Organizational frame bending: Principles for managing reorientation. Academy of Management Executive, 1989, 3(3), 194-204.
53.
OSBORN, R. N., JAUCH, L. R., MARTIN, T. N., & GLUECK, W. F.The event of CEO succession, performance, and environmental conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24, 183-191.
54.
PASCARELLA, P.The new achievers. New York: Free Press, 1984.
55.
PERROW, C.Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: Random House, 1986.
56.
PFEFFER, J.The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 1977, 2, 104-112.
57.
PFEFFER, J.Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman, 1981.
58.
PFEFFER, J.Organizational demography. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), 1983, Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 299-357.
59.
PFEFFER, J., & DAVIS-BLAKE, A.Administrative succession and organizational performance: How administrator experience mediates the succession effect. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29, 72-83.
60.
PFEFFER, J., & LEBLEBICI, H.Executive recruitment and the development of interfirm organizations. Administrative Science Quarterl, 1973, 18, 449-461.
61.
PFEFFER, J., & MOORE, W. L.Average Tenure of Department Heads: The effects of paradigm, size, and departmental demography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 387-406.
62.
PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G. R.Organizational context and the characteristics and tenure of hospital administrators. Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20, 74-88.
63.
PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G. R.The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
64.
PITTS, R. A., & HOPKINS, H. D.Firm diversity: Conceptualization and measurement. Academy of Management Review, 1982, 7, 620-629.
65.
REED, R., & REED, M.CEO experience and diversification strategy fit. Journal of Management Studies, 1989, 26, 251-270.
66.
REINGANUM, M. R.The effect of executive succession on stockholder wealth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 30, 46-60.
67.
RUMELT, R. P.Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1974.
68.
SALANCIK, G. R., & PFEFFER, J.Who gets power and how they hold onto it: A strategic contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 1977, 5, 3-21.
69.
SALANCIK, G., & PFEFFER, J.Effects of ownership and performance on executive succession in U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23, 653-664.
70.
SCHWARTZ, K. B., & MENON, K.Executive succession in failing firms. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28, 680-686.
71.
SMITH, M., & WHITE, M. C.Strategy, CEO specialization and succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, 263-280.
72.
SNOW, C. C., & HREBINIAK, L. G.Strategy, distinctive, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 25, 317-336.
73.
SONG, J. H.Diversification strategies and the experience of top executives of large firms. Research Notes and Communications, 1982, 377-380.
74.
SZILAGYI, A. D. Jr., & SCHWEIGER, D. M.Matching Managers to strategies: A review and suggested framework. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 626-637.
75.
THOMAS, A. S., LITSCHERT, R. J., & RAMASWAMY, K.The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12, 509-522.
76.
THOMPSON, J. D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
77.
TROW, D. B.Executive succession in small companies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1961, 6, 228-239.
78.
TUSHMAN, M., & ROMANELLI, E.Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In B. M. StawandL. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1985, pp. 171-222.
79.
TUSHMAN, M. L., VIRANY, B., & ROMANELLI, E.Executive succession, strategy reorientation, and organizational evolution. Technology in Society, 1985, 7, 297-314.
80.
TUSHMAN, M. L., NEWMAN, W. H., & ROMANELLI, E.Convergence and upheaval: Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. California Management Review, 1986, 29(1), 29-44.
81.
VANCIL, R. FPassing the baton: Managing the process of CEO succession. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1987.
82.
VENKATRAMAN, N., & GRANT, J. H.Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11, 71-87.
83.
VIRANY, B., & TUSHMAN, M. L.Top management teams and corporate success in an emerging industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 1986, 1(3), 261-274.
84.
WHITE, M. C., SMITH, M., & BARNETT, T.A typology of executive career specialization. Human Relations, 1994, 31, 11-22.
85.
WIERSEMA, M. F, & BANTEL, K. A.Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Joumal, 1992, 35(1), 91-121.
86.
WORRELL, D. L., DAVIDSON, W., III, WALLACE, N., & GLASCOCK, J. L.Stockholder reactions to departures and appointments of key executives attributable to firings. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36, 387-401.
87.
ZAJAC, E. J.CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 1990, 11, 217-230.
