The Sin of the Father: Reflections on the Roles of the Corporation Man,the Suburban Housewife,Their Son,and Their Daughter in the Deconstruction of the Patriarch

Abstract

The roots of the postmodernist denigration of the patriarch are traced to the postwar middle class family. The premise of this family was that the father would work and make possible a sphere of family life in which maternal influences, based on a primordial image of the mother, could operate without constraint. But identification with the primordial mother was psychologically insupportable for the mother, who blamed the father and enlisted the son in her antagonism. This deprived the son of the possibility of forming a superego and resulted in his aliention. The daughter raised the antagonism to the level of social program and carried it forward.

Keywords

patriarchy alienation postmodernism women's studies corporation man feminine mystique feminism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BENDIX, R. Work and authority in industry: Ideologies of management in the course of industrialization. Berkeley: University of California , 1956.

BEST, S. , & KELLNER, D. Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. New York: Guilford , 1991

CHASSEGUET-SMIRGEL, J. Sexuality and mind. The role of the father and the mother in the psyche. New York: New York University Press , 1986.

EISLER, R. The chalice and the blade: Our history, our future. San Francisco: Harper and Row , 1987.

FERGUSON, K. The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University , 1984.

FLEISHMAN, E. A. , HARRIS, E. F. , & BURTT, H. E. Leadership and Supervision in Industry. Research Monograph No. 33, Ohio State University, Bureau of Educational Research, Columbus , 1955.

FOUCAULT, M. Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage Books , 1979.

FRIEDAN, B. The feminine mystique. New York: Laurel , 1963.

FREUD, S. The grounds for detaching a particular syndrome from neurasthenia under the description “anxiety neurosis.” In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. (Vol. 3). London: Hogarth , 1895/1962, 90-115.

10.

GILLIGAN, C. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University , 1982.

11.

HARDING, S. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University , 1986.

12.

KENISTON, K. The uncommitted: Alienated youth in American society. New York: Delta , 1960.

13.

KORMAN, A. K. Consideration, initiating structure and organizational criteria-a review . Personnel Psychology, 1966, 19, 349-361 .

14.

MacKINNON, C. A. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University , 1989.

15.

McCLARY, S. Feminine endings: Music, gender, and sexuality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota , 1991.

16.

McGREGOR, D. The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1960.

17.

NYE, A. Words of power: A feminist reading of the history of logic. New York: Routledge , 1990.

18.

PATAI, D. , & KOERTGE, N. Professing feminism. New York: Basic Books , 1994.

19.

ROETHLISBERGER, F. Management and morale. Cambridge: Harvard University , 1943.

20.

SCHWARTZ, H. S. Narcissistic process and corporate decay: The theory of the organization ideal. New York: New York University Press , 1990.

21.

SCHWARTZ, H. S. Narcissistic emotion and university administration: An analysis of “Political Correctness.” In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations. London: Sage , 1993, pp. 190-215.

22.

SCHWARTZ, H. S. Masculinity and the meaning of work: A response to Manichean feminism . Administration and Society, 1995, 27(2), 249-274 .

23.

SCHWARTZ, H. S. Psychological Regression in the Politically Correct University. Working paper, Oakland University , 1996.

24.

SIMPSON, P. A critique of Brown and Gilligan's Meeting at the Crossroads . Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy Review, 1995, 6(1), 24-34 .

25.

SINCLAIR, A. Sex and the MBA . Organization, 1995, 2(2), 295-317 .

26.

WILSON, S. The man in the gray flannel suit. New York: Simon and Schuster , 1955.