It is widely accepted that different strategies need to be implemented in different ways. The strategy style match model assumes personality is the primary determinant of strategy implementation actions. It is argued that such an approach is inadequate because it ignores the effect of context on behavior. The study demonstrates that strategic context influences managers' espoused strategy implementation intentions. The implications for the management of human resources in strategic change are discussed.
ARGYRIS, C.Strategy implementation: An experience in learning . Organizational Dynamics, Autumn 1989, 5-14 .
2.
BEER, M. , EISENSTAT, R. A. , & SPECTOR, B.Why change programs don't produce change . Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec. 1990, 158-166 .
3.
COVIN, J. G.Entrepreneurial versus conservative firms: A comparison of strategies and performance . Journal of Management Studies, 1991, 28, 439-462 .
4.
DAVIG, W.Business strategies in smaller manufacturing firms . Journal of Small Business Management, 1986, 24, 38-46 .
5.
DUNPHY, D. , & STACE, D.Under new management: Australian organizations in transition. Sydney: McGraw Hill Book Company , 1990.
6.
EYSENK, M. , & EYSENK, H.Mischel and the concept of personality . British Journal of Psychology, 1980, 71, 191-204 .
7.
GINSBERG, A.Measuring and modeling changes in strategy.Theoretical foundations and empirical directions . Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9, 559-575 .
8.
GIOIA, D. , & POOLE, P.Scripts in organizational behavior . Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 449-459 .
9.
GOVINDARAJAN, V.A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: Integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy . Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31, 828-853 .
10.
GOVINDARAJAN, V.Implementing competitive strategies at the business unit level, Implications of matching managers to strategy . Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10, 251-269 .
11.
GUPTA, A.Contingency linkages between strategy and general manager characteristics: A conceptual examination . Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 399-412 .
12.
GUPTA, A. , & GOVINDARAJAN, V.Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation . Academy of Management Journal, 1984, 27, 25-41 .
13.
HAMBRICK, D. C.High profit strategies in mature capital goods industries: A contingency approach . Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26, 687-707 .
14.
HAMBRICK, D. , & MASON, P.Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers . Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 193-206 .
15.
HAMEL, G. , & PRAHALAD, C. K.Strategic intent . Harvard Business Review, 1989, 67, 63-76 .
16.
LEVENSON, H.Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct. New York: Academic Press , 1981, pp. 15-63.
17.
LUTHANS, F.Organizational behavior. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company , 1985.
18.
MILES, R. E. , & SNOW, C. C.Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1978.
19.
MILLER, D. , & TOULOUSE, J.1986 Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms . Management Science, 1986, 32, 1389-1409 .
20.
MILLER, D. , KETS DE VRIES, M. , & TOULOUSE, J.Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy making, structure, and environment . Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 237-253 .
21.
MISCHEL, W.Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality . Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 252-283 .
22.
MISCHEL, W. , & PEAKE, P. K.Beyond déjà vu in the search for cross-situational consistency . Psychological Review, 1982, 89, 730-755 .
23.
MITROFF, I. I.Stakeholders of the organizational mind. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 1983.
ROBINSON, J. P. , SHAVER, P. R. , & WRIGHTSMAN, L. S.Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press , 1991.
29.
SARASON, I. G. , SMITH, R. E. , & DIENER, E.Personality research: Components of variance attributable to the person and the situation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 199-204 .
30.
SCHNEIDER, B.Interactional psychology and organizational behavior . Research in Organizational Behavior, 1983, 5, 1-31 .
31.
SEGEV, E.A systematic comparative analysis and synthesis of two business level strategic typologies . Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10, 487-505 .
32.
SHORTELL, S. , & ZAJAC, E.Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity . Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33, 817-832 .
33.
SLATER, S.The influence of managerial style on business unit performance . Journal of Management, 1989, 15, 441-455 .
34.
SONG, J.Diversification strategies and the experience of top executives of large firms . Strategic Management Journal, 1982, 3, 377-380 .
35.
STODGILL, R. M.Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press , 1974.
36.
SZILAGYI, A. , & SCHWEIGER, D.Matching managers to strategies: A review and suggested framework . Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 626-637 .
37.
THOMAS, A. S. , LITSCHERT, R. J. , & RAMASWAMY, S.The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment: An empirical examination . Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12, 509-522 .
38.
THOMAS, J. B. , & MCDANIEL, R. R.Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of strategy and the information processing structure of top management teams . Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33, 286-307 .
39.
WOOLRIDGE, B. , & FLOYD, S. W.Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Operations, The Implications of Middle Management Involvement in Strategy . Paper presented at the 10th Annual International Conference of the Strategic Management Society, Stockholm, 199.
