This paper presents the early findings of a pilot study of the power and influence of part-time board members in the top 200 U.K. industrial and commercial firms by turnover and the top 50 U.K. financial institutions. The part-time board members hold multiple roles of either chairman and/or non-executive director of these organizations. The findings are presented around a tripartite model of power and influence. The results indicate that the power and influence of part-time board members is shaped by the simultaneous and interactive effects of a set of structural and contextual factors, position and skill in mobilizing a constellation of power sources, and skill and will in converting potential power into actual influence.
BERLE, A. A. & MEANS G. C.The modem corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan, 1932.
2.
BRADSHAW P., MURRAY V., & WOLPIN J. Do non-profit boards make a difference? An exploration of the relationship between board structure, process and effectiveness. Unpublished paper, Faculty of Administrative Studies, York University, Ontario, 1992.
3.
BRASS, D. J., & BURKHARDT, M. G.Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behaviour. Academy of Management Joumal, 1993, 36(3), 441-470.
4.
CADBURY REPORT. Committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance, London: Moorgate, 1992.
5.
CHARKHAM, J.Keeping good company: A study of corporate governance in five countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
6.
CONYON, M. J.Corporate governance changes in UK companies between 1988 and 1993. Corporate Governance, 1994, 2(2), 97-109.
7.
DAVIS, G. F.Agents without principals? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, 36, 683-613.
8.
DEMB, A. & NEUBAUER, F.The corporate board. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
9.
THE ECONOMIST, Watching the boss: A survey of corporate governance, January 29-February 4, 1994, 62-for 17-17 pages. 1994.
10.
FAMA, E. F., & JENSEN, M. C.Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, 26, 3127-3349.
11.
FERLIE, E. F., ASHBURNER, L., & FITZGERALD, L. The Non-executive director and the board-Some evidence from the NHS. Unpublished paper, Centre for Corporate Strategy and Change, University of Warwick, January 1994.
12.
FERLIE, E. F., ASHBURNER, L., FITZGERALD, L., & PElTIGREW, A. M.The new public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.
13.
FIDLER, J.The British business elite: Its attitudes to class, status and power. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.
14.
FROST, P. J.Power, politics and influence. In L. L. Porter, L. C. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, and G. M. Jablin (Eds.), The handbook of organisational communication. Beverley Hills: Sage, 1986.
15.
GIDDENS A.Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan, 1979.
16.
GREEN, SIR OWEN. Corporate governance-Great expectation. Pall Mall Lecture, Institute of Directors, London, 24 February 1994.
17.
HERMAN, E. S.Corporate control, corporate power. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
18.
HOGG, SIR CHRISTOPHER. Who governs? Unpublished paper, London, Reuters, 25 March 1994.
19.
HOUSE, R. J.Power and personality in complex organisations. In B. M. Staw and L. C. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organisational behaviour (Vol. 10), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988, pp. 305-357.
20.
JENSEN M. C., & MECKLING, W. H.Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3, 305-360.
21.
KIPNIS, D., SCHMIDT, S. M., & WILKINSON, J.Intraorganisational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 440-452.
22.
KNOKE, D.Political networks: The structural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
23.
KOSNIK, R. D.Greenmail: A study of board performance in Corporate Governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, pp. 163-185.
24.
KRACKHARDT, D.Assessing the political landscape: Structure cognition and power in organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35, 342-369.
25.
LORSCH, J. W., & MacIVER, E.Pawns and potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1989.
26.
MACE, M.Directors: Myth and reality. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
27.
McNULTY, T., & PETTIGREW, A. M.Studying directors' careers: Early findings from a UK study. Paper presented to the International Research Conference on Corporate Change, Australian Graduate School of Management, Sydney, 22-24 August 1994. (Also available from the Centre for Corporate Strategy and Change, University of Warwick).
28.
MECHANIC, D.Sources of power of lower participants in complex organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1964, 7(3), 349-364.
29.
MINTZBERG, H.Power in and around organisations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1983.
30.
MIZRUCHI, M. S.Who controls whom? An examination of the relations between management and board directors in large American corporations. Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8, 426-435.
31.
MIZRUCHI, M. S.The structure of corporate political action: Interfirm relations and their consequences, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
PAHL, R. E., & WINKLER, J. T.The economic elite: Theory and practice. In P. J. Stanworth and A. Giddens (Eds.), Elites and power in British society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1974.
34.
PETTIGREW, A. M.Information control as a power resource, Sociology, 1972, 6, 187-204.
35.
PETTIGREW, A. M.The politics of organisational decision making. London: Tavistock, 1973.
36.
PETTIGREW, A. M.On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal1992, 13, Winter Special Edition, 163-182. (a)
37.
PETTIGREW, M. A.Board of directors: A review of recent research. Working paper. Centre for Corporate Strategy and Change, University of Warwick, 1992. (b)
38.
PETTIGREW, A. M. & WHIPP, R.Managing change for competitive success, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
39.
PETTIGREW, A. M., FERLIE E., FITZGERALD L., & WENSLEY, R.The leadership role of the new health authorities: An agenda for research and development. Public Money and Management, Spring, 1991, 1-5.
40.
PFEFFER, J.Managing with power: politics and influence in organisations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
41.
RUSSELL, B.Power: A social analysis, New York: Norton, 1938.
STEWART, R.Chairmen and chief executives: An exploration of their relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 1991, 28(5), 1511-1527.
44.
TRICKER, R. I.The independent director: A study of the non-executive director and of the audit committee. Croydon: Tolley, 1978.
45.
USEEM, M.Executive Defense: Shareholder power and corporate reorganisation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
46.
WILSON, C. S., & LUPTON, T.The bank rate tribunal: The social background and connections of top decision makersManchester School of Social and Economic Studies, 1959, 27, 30-51.
47.
ZAJAC, E. J.CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical synthesis and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 1990, 217-230.
