Organizational researchers tend to explain the often high degree of unpredictability in managerial decision-making in terms of differences in the cognitive processes of decision-makers. However, the decision criteria used by managers remain relatively unexplored. Viewing the use of decision criteria as a method by which managers justify their decisions, we examine the logics of justification underlying an empirically-generated list of decision criteria. We then test a number of hypotheses regarding the impact of power-related individual and role characteristics on the decision criteria used by the 962 public sector managers in our sample. The results suggest that although managers may indeed use decision criteria based on two different underlying logics of justification (i.e., strategic and tactical), power-related characteristics of individuals and roles explain only a limited proportion of the variance in the use of decision criteria based upon strategic logics of justification, and explain an even smaller proportion of the variance in the use of decision criteria based upon tactical logics of justification.
ALDRICH, H., & HERKER, D.Boundary spanning roles and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 1977, 2, 217-230.
2.
ALLISON, G., The essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown, 1971.
3.
ALVAREZ, R.Discrimination in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.
4.
BACHRACH, P., & BARATZ, M.Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970.
5.
BACHARACH, S., & AIKEN, M.Structural and process constraints on influence in organizations: A level specific analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21(4), 623-642.
6.
BACHARACH, S., BAMBERGER, P., & MUNDELL, B.Status inconsistency in organizations: From social hierarchy to stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1993, 14, 21-36.
7.
BACHARACH, S., & LAWLER, E.Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
8.
BARNARD, C.Functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938.
BOZEMAN, B.All organizations are public. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
13.
BRAYBROOKE, D., & LINDBLOM, C.A strategy of decision. New York, 1963.
14.
BUCHANAN, B.Government managers, business executives and organizational commitment. Public Administration Review, 1974, 35, 339-347.
15.
BUCHANAN, B.Red tape and the public service ethic: Some unexpected differences between public and private managers. Administration and Society, 1975, 6, 423-438.
16.
CLIFF, N.The eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103, 276-279.
17.
CYERT, R., & MARCH, J.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
18.
DEMING, W.Out of the crisis: Quality, productivity, and competitive position. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
19.
FESTINGER, L.A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson, 1957.
20.
FOX, F. & STAW, B.The trapped administrator: The effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 449-471.
21.
GERHART, B.The prediction of voluntary turnover using tenure, behavioral intentions, job situation, and area unemployment rates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75, 467-476.
22.
HAMBRICK, D., & MASON, P.Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 193-206.
23.
HELLER, F., & YUKL, G.Participation and managerial decision making as a function of situational variables. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1969, 4, 227-241.
24.
HICKSON, D., BUTLER, R., CRAY, D., MALLORY, G., & WILSON, D.Top decisions: Strategic decision making in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
25.
HININGS, G., & GREENWOOD, R.The normative prescription of organizations. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations. Chicago: Ballinger, 1988, p. 53-70.
26.
HUBER, G.Temporal stability and response-order biases in participant descriptions of organizational decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28(4), 943-950.
27.
JANIS, I., & MANN, L.Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: The Free Press, 1977.
28.
JORESKOG, K., & SORBOM, D.Recent developments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 198219, 404-416.
29.
JORESKOG, K & SORBOM, D.LISREL VI Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala, 1984.
30.
KALLMAN, E., REINHARTH, L., & SHAPIRO, H.How effective companies manage their information. Business, 1980, 30(4), 35-39.
31.
KANTER, R.Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1978.
32.
KANTER, R.The change masters: Innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983.
33.
KEMERY, E., MOSSHOLDER, K. & BEDEIAN, A.Role stress, physical symptomology, and turnover intentions: A causal analysis of three alternative specifications. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1987, 8, 11-23.
34.
LINDBLOM, C.The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 1959, 19, 79-88.
35.
MacCRIMMON, K, & TAYLOR, R.Decision making and problem solving. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizationalpsychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976, p. 1379-1453.
36.
MARCH, J., & SIMON, H.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
37.
MILLER, D.Strategy, structure, and environment: Context influence upon some bivariate associations. Journal of Management Studies, 197916, 44-53.
38.
MINTZBERG, H.Strategy making in three modes. California Management Review, 197316, 44-53.
39.
MINTZBERG, H.Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983.
40.
MINTZBERG, H., RAISINGHANI, D., & THEORET, T.The structure of "unstructured" decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 246-275.
41.
NISBETT, R., & WILSON, T.Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 197784, 231-259.
42.
PERROW, C.Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: Random House, 1986.
43.
PERRY, J., & RAINEY, H.The public-private distinction in organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 198813, 182-201.
44.
PFEFFER, J.Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman, 1981.
45.
PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G.Organizational decision making as a political process: The case of a university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 1974, 19(2), 135-151.
46.
PFEFFER, J., SALANCIK, G., & LEBLEBICI, H.The effect of uncertainty on the use of social influence in organizational decision makingAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 227-245.
47.
PRIMOZIC, K., PRIMOZIC, E., & LEBEN, J.Strategic choices: Supremacy, survival or sayonara. New York: McGraw Hill, 1991.
48.
PRUITT, D., & RUBIN, J.Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate and settlement. New York: Random House, 1985.
49.
RAGINS, B., & SUNDSTRUM, E.Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 105(1), 55-88.
50.
SCHAUBROECK, J., COTTON, J., & JENNINGS, KAntecedents and consequences of role stress: A covariance structure analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1989, 10, 35-58.
51.
SCHICK, A.University budgeting: Administrative perspective, budget structure, and budget process. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10(4), 794-802.
52.
SCOTT, M., & LYMAN, S.Accounts. American Sociological Review, 1968, 33, 46-62.
53.
SIMON, H.Administrative Behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press, 1976.
54.
SLOVIC, P., & LICHTENSTEIN, S.Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971, 6, 649-744.
55.
SMITH, M. & WHITE, M.Strategy, CEO specialization, and succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, 263-180.
56.
STAHL, M., & ZIMMERER, M.Modelling strategic acquisition policies: A simulation of executives' acquisition decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 1984, 27(2), 369-383.
57.
STRICKLIN, W. Toward a Theory of Organizational Decision Making. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1966.
58.
TAGER, R.Stress and the older worker. In H. Dennis (Ed.), Fourteen steps in managing an aging work force. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988, p. 55-66.
59.
TETLOCK, P.Accountability: The neglected social context of judgement and choice. In Commings and Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1985, p. 297-332.
60.
THOMPSON, J.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill, 1967.
61.
WALSTER, E., & WALSTER, G.The temporal sequence of post-decision processes. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1964.
62.
WEBER, M.The theory of social and economic organization (translated and edited by A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons). New York: Oxford University Press, 1947.
63.
ZWICK, W., & VELICER, W.Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 99, 432-442.
