This paper posits an interpretivist approach to the study of human resource management (HRM) by examining how organizational members construct meanings of HRM in everyday life through ritualistic behavior and the use of language. Concepts from language philosophy and socio-anthropology are brought together to develop an analytical premise upon which we can begin to appreciate the seemingly complex issues associated with expressive and ritualistic behavior in organizations. Propositions are posited and subsequently examined through an analysis of statements about teamwork in a Kenyan firm. A thematic analysis reveals that teamwork is a totemic device created by organizational members in everyday life. Through shifts in language games ranging from rhetoric to plain speaking, management uses the totem of teamwork to create and legitimize the desired pattern of power and social relations.
AHLSTRAND, B.Productivity bargaining: A case of Fawley after Flanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
2.
ARMSTRONG, M.A case of the emperor's new clothes?Personnel Management, August, 1987.
3.
BABCOCK, B. A.The reversible world: Symbolic reversal in art and society. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1978.
4.
BEATTIE, J.Other cultures: Aims, methods and achievements in social anthropology. London: Cohen & West, 1964.
5.
BERG, P. O.Symbolic management of human resource management. Human Resource Management, 1986, 35, 557-579.
6.
BERGER, P., & LUCKMANN, T.The social construction of reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966.
7.
BETTMAN, J. R., & WEITZ, B. A.Attribution in the board room: Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 168-183.
CLEVERLY, G.Managers and magic. Harlow Longman, 1971.
10.
COHEN, A. P., & COMAROFF, J. L.The management of meaning: On the phenomenology of political transactions. In B. Kapferer (Ed.), Transactions and meaning: Directions in the anthropology of exchange and symbolic behaviour. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1976.
11.
DILTHEY, W. In H. P. Rickman (Ed.), Selected writings. London: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
12.
DURKHEIM, E.Elementary forms of religious life (Translated by J. W. Swain). London: George Allen & Unwin, 1976.
13.
EVANS-PRITCHARD, E. E.Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1937.
14.
GADAMER, H. G.Warheit und method. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1965 (Cited in G. Burrell and G. Morgan. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann, 1979).
15.
GAMBLING, T. E.Accounting for rituals. Accounting Organizations and Society, 1987, 12, 319-329.
16.
GLUCKMAN, M.Order and rebellion in tribal Africa. London: Cohen and West, 1963.
17.
GOFFMAN, E.The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday, 1959.
18.
GOWLER, D., & LEGGE, K.Negation, synthesis and abomination in rhetoric. In C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behaviour. London: Academic Press, 1981.
19.
GOWLER, D., & LEGGE, K.The meaning of management and the management of meaning. In M. Earl (Ed.), Perspectives in management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.
20.
GOWLER, D., & LEGGE, K.Personnel and paradigms: Four perspectives on the future of work. Industrial Relations Journal, 1986, 17, 225-235.
21.
GUEST, D.Human resource management and the American dream. Journal of Management Studies, 1990, 27, 377-397.
22.
HARRE, R.Man as rhetorician. In A. J. Chapman and D. M. Jones (Eds.), Models of man. Leicester: The British Psychological Society, 1980.
23.
KAMOCHE, K.A multiparadigmatic analysis of human resource management. Personnel Review, 1991, 20, 3-14.
24.
KAMOCHE, K.Human resource management: An assessment of the Kenyan case. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1992, 3, 497-521.
25.
KEENOY, T.Human resource management: Rhetoric, reality and contradiction. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1990, 1, 363-384.
MUNENE, J. C.Organizational environment in Africa. Human Relations, 1991, 44, 439-458.
28.
PARKIN, D.The rhetoric of responsibility: Bureaucratic communication in a Kenyan farming area. In M. Block (Ed.), Political language and oratory in traditional society. London: Academic Press, 1975.
29.
SACKMAN, S.The role of metaphors in organizational transformation. Human Relations, 1989, 42, 463-485.
30.
SCHUTZ, R. S.The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1967.
31.
SILVERMAN, D., & JONES, J.Organizational work; the language of grading/the grading of language. London: Collier/Macmillan, 1976.
32.
SKINNER, W.Big hat, no cattle: managing human resources. Harvard Business Review, 1981, 59, 106-114.
33.
TRICE, H. M., & BEYER, J. M.Using six organizational rites to change culture. In R. H. Kilman, M. J. Saxton, A. Serpa, and Associates (Eds.), Gaining control of the corporate culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
34.
WEICK, K E.Enactment processes in organizations. In B. M. Staw and G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New Directions in organizational behaviour. MaLabar, Fla.: R. E. Krieger, 1982.
35.
WILSON, F.Language, technology, gender, and power. Human Relations, 1992, 45, 883-904.
