Organization culture contains psychosocial defenses against the experience of anxiety in the workplace. It is, therefore, possible to understand organization culture by the quantity, quality, and permanence of these defenses. Psychoanalytic object relations developmental theory provides a means of understanding psychological defenses. The theory includes three forms of subjective experience, psychodynamics, and psychological defenses-presubjective, intrasubjective, and intersubjective. When these three subjective perspectives are used to understand psychosocial defenses in the workplace, they permit the development of a systematic understanding of organization culture. A taxonomy is provided that uses the three levels of developmental subjectivity and accompanying psychologically defensive processes to understand organization culture. The taxonomy is then found to subsume other theoretical perspectives for understanding organizational dynamics.
ALLCORN, S.Understanding groups at work. Personnel, 1989, 66(8), 28-36.
2.
ALLCORN, S.Workplace superstars in resistant organizations. New York: Quorum, 1991.
3.
ALLCORN, S.Codependency in the workplace. New York: Quorum, 1992.
4.
ARGYRIS, C., & SCHON D.Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley, 1978.
5.
ARGYRIS, C. & SCHON D.Theory in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.
6.
ASHBACH, C., & SCHERMER, V.Object relations, the self, and the group. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987.
7.
BAUM, H.The invisible bureaucracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
8.
BAUM, H.Organizational membership: personal development in the workplace. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1990.
9.
BION, W.Experience in groups. London: Tavistock Publications, 1961.
10.
BOWLBY, T.Attachment and loss, Vol, 1: Attachment. London: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, 1969.
11.
COLMAN, A., & GELLER, M. (Eds.) Group relations reader 2. Washington D. C.: A. K. Rice Institute, 1985.
12.
De BOARD, R.The psychoanalysis of organization. London: Tavistock Publications, 1978.
13.
DIAMOND, M.Psychological dimensions of personal responsibility for public management: An object relations approach. Journal of Management Studies, 1985, 22(6), 649-667.
14.
DIAMOND, M.Resistance to change: A psychoanalytic critique of Argyris and Schon's contributions to organizational theory and intervention. Journal of Management Studies, 1986, 23(5), 543-562.
DIAMOND, M.The unconscious life of organizations: integrating organizational identity. New York: Quorum, 1993.
18.
DIAMOND, M., & ALLCORN, S.Psychological barriers to personal responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, 198412,(4), 66-77.
19.
DIAMOND, M., & ALLCORN, S.The psychodynamics of regression in work groups. Human Relations, 1987, 40(8), 525-543.
20.
GILKEY, R.The psychodynamics of upheaval. In M. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the couch. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass(pp. 331-360), 1991.
21.
GREENBERG, J., & MITCHELL, S.Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.
22.
HAMILTON, N.Self and others: Object relations theory in practice. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, 1990.
23.
HIRSCHORN, L.The workplace within. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.
24.
JAQUES, E.Social systems as a defense against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In M. Klein, P. Heimann, & R. E. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New direction in psychoanalysis. London: Tavistock Publications, 1955,pp. 478-498.
