Previous research has suggested that the extent to which rehabilitation agencies must compete over clientele affects the structure and behavior of organizations. Institutional theory suggests, however, that increased competition is unlikely to affect the rehabilitation process and client outcomes. In this paper, multiple regression analysis on survey data from 135 agencies in 22 states suggested that organizational structure and behavior were not affected. However, increased competition did appear to lead to a greater retention of clientele while personnel constraints appeared to increase the referral of clients to other agencies. Since agencies have less control over funding and other related scarce resources, clientele appear to be the manipulable resource which can be referred or retained to meet organizational needs.
ALTSCHULD, J. W., & LOWER, M. A.Improving mailed questionnaires: Analysis of a 96 percent return rate. In D. C. Lockhart (Ed.), Making effective use of mailed questionnaires. San Francisco: Evaluation Research Society, Jossey-Bass, 1984, pp. 5-18.
2.
American Foundation for the Blind. Directory of agencies. New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1984.
3.
ARDOS, P. L., & MORGAN, A. J.Professional mail survey. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
4.
BAUMGARTNER, R. M., & HEBERLEIN, T. A.Recent research on mailed questionnaire response rates. In D. Lockhart (Ed.), Making effective use of mailed questionnaires. San Francisco: Evaluation Research Society, Jossey-Bass, 1984, pp. 65-76.
5.
DILLMAN, D. A.Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1978.
6.
DILLMAN, D. A., DILLMAN, J. J., & MAKOELA, C. J.The importance of adhering to details of the Total Design Method (TDM) for mail surveys. In D. C. Lockhart (Ed.), Making effective use of mailed questionnaires. San Francisco: Evaluation Research Society, Jossey-Bass, 1984, pp. 49-64.
7.
DiMAGGIO, P. J., & POWELL, W. W.The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48, 147-160.
8.
GOODMAN, L. A.The relationship between modified and usual multiple regression approaches to the analysis of dichotomous variables. In D. W. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976, pp. 83-110.
JERNIGAN, KBlindness: Simplicity, Complexity, and the Public Mind. Address to the Annual Meeting of the National Federation for the Blind, July 8, 1982.
11.
KRAUSE, E. A.After the rehabilitation center. Social Problems, 1966, 14, 197-206.
12.
LEWIS-BECK, M. S.Applied regression. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980.
13.
MEYER, J. W., & ROWAN, B.Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83, 340-363.
14.
MEYER, J. W., SCOTT, W. R., & DEAL, T. E.Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure. In J. W. Meyer and W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1983, pp. 45-67.
15.
National Society to Prevent Blindness. Vision problems in the US. New York: National Society to Prevent Blindness, 1980.
16.
NELSON, N.Workshops for the handicapped in the United States. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1971.
17.
NIE, N. H., HALL, C. H., JENKINS, J. G., STEINBRENNER, K, & BRENT, D.H.SPSS (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, 1975.
18.
PEDHAZUR, E.Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1982.
19.
PERROW, C.Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: Random House, 1986.
20.
SCOTT, R. A.The factory as a social service organization: Goal displacement in workshops for the blind. Social Problems, 1967, 15, 160-175.
21.
SCOTT, R. A.The making of blind men. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.
22.
SCOTT, W. R.Introduction: From technology to environment. In J. W. Meyer and W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1983, pp. 13-17.
23.
SCOTT, W. R.Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
24.
SHANKS, S. L. An Inept Category-The Blind: Dependency and Mainstreaming of Different Social Types. Unpublished M. A. thesis, University of Texas at El Paso, 1981.
25.
SHANKS, S. L. Blindness Rehabilitation Networks: Systems of Competition, Conflict, and Symbiosis. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1986.
26.
STODDARD, E. R., & SHANKS, S. L.Social types and differential rehabilitation within "the blind" role: A sociological view of the visually compromised. California Sociologist, 1983, 6, 105-127.
27.
SUDMAN, S. & BRADBURN, N.Improving mailed questionnaire design. In D. C. Lockhart (Ed.), Making effective use of mailed questionnaires. San Francisco: Evaluation Research Society, Jossey-Bass, 1984, pp. 33-47.
28.
TURK, H.Interorganizational networks in urban society: Initial perspectives and comparative research. American Sociological Review, 1970, 35, 1-19.
29.
WARWICK, D. & LININGER, C. A.The sample survey: Theory and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975.
30.
WHEELER, S.The structure of formally organized socialization settings. In O. G. Brin, Jr. and S. Wheeler (Eds.), Socialization after childhood. New York: John Wiley, 1966, pp. 51-116.
31.
WILENSKY, H. & LEBEAUX, C. N.Industrial society and social welfare. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1965.
32.
WRIGHT, S. R.Quantitative methods and statistics. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979.
33.
YUCHTMAN, E. & SEASHORE, S. E.A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32, 891-903.
34.
ZAHL, P. A.Blindness. New York: Hafner Publishing Company, 1963.
