Problems of perspective, proximity and distance, objectivity, and self-interest perpetuate tensions in the social sciences. In positivistic research, still dominant in the organizational sciences, attention has been concentrated on the eradication of bias in the researcher. The effects of this approach have extended into areas where it is implicit and remains unrecognized, particularly in the tradition of “reflexive sociology.” The focal problem here is one of self-knowing and declaration. Focusing on distanciation, the problem of stepping outside one's data, is an alternative perspective. Esthetic approaches to this issue demonstrate that the processes of fictionalization are endemic to the interpretation of data and the production of research accounts. Language is the central element in creating accounts which are constitutive of the world rather than revelatory of its essence, and hence are partial and persuasive versions of reality. This is discussed with reference to the work of organizational and occupational ethnographers. It is argued that research accounts are inescapably an order of fiction, representations of a world which is unknowable in any “objective” sense. However, the process and products of social science have a dehumanizing effect on social research in failing to recognize this. This cannot be countered by humanist strategies (e.g. self-declaration, confessional, etc.) which preserve misconceptions of authenticity but by exploration of what Lyotard calls the inhuman, those subliminal aspects of experience which are at or beyond the boundaries of articulation. This needs to be done by a greater incorporation of other forms of investigation of the human condition-literature, poetry, art, music-which habitually work at or on these boundaries into the form and processes of “normal” social science.
BARTHES, R.Image-music-text (translated by Stephen Heath). London: Fontana Collins , 1977.
6.
BATESON, G.Steps to an ecology of mind. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson , 1987.
7.
BAUMAN, Z.Hermeneutics and social science. London: Hutchinson , 1978.
8.
BLUM, A. F.Theorizing. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life. London: RKP , 1971.
9.
BLUM, A. F. , & McHUGH, P.Self-reflection in the arts and sciences. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press , 1984.
10.
BROWN, R. H.A poetic for sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ,:1977.
11.
BUDICK, S. , & ISER, W.Languages of the unsayable. New York: Columbia University Press , 1989.
12.
BULLOUGH, E.Physical distance as a factor in art and as an aesthetic principle. In F. A. Tillman and S. M. Cahn (Eds.), Philosophy of art and aesthetics. New York: Harper & Row , 1969.
13.
CASE, P.Information happenings: Performing reflexive organizational research. In P. Jeffcutt , S. Linstead , and R. Grafton Small (Eds.), “Organization and theatre.” Special issue of Studies in Cultures. Organizations and Societies, Vol. 1, No. 2, (Forthcoming).
14.
CASTANEDA, C.The teachings of Don Juan. London: Penguin , 1970.
15.
CHIA, R.Address to ESRC management teaching fellows conference, quoted in H. Davies Weak outdo the strong . The Times Higher, May 28, 1993, p. 4 .
16.
CLIFFORD, J. , & MARCUS, G. (Eds.). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press , 1986.
COLES, R. C.The call of stories—Teaching and the moral imagination. Boston: Houghton Mifflin , 1989.
19.
COOPER, R. C.The other—A model of human structuring. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method. London: Sage , 1983, pp. 202-218.
20.
COOPER, R. C.Notes on Organizational Kitsch . Paper presented to the Conference on Aspects of Organization, University of Lancaster, 1986.
21.
COOPER, R. C.Varieties of Postmodern Learning . Paper presented to the Conference Postmodern Management—The Implications for Learning, EADA, Barcelona, 1989.
22.
COOPER, R. C.Organization/disorganization. In J. Hassard and D. Pym (Eds.), The theory and philosophy of organizations. London: Routledge , 1990, pp. 167-197.
23.
COOPER, R. C.Formal organization as representation: Displacement, abbreviation, and remote control. In M. Reed and M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organization. London: Sage , 1992, pp. 254-272.
24.
COOPER, R. C. , & FOX, S.Two modes of organizing. In R. Mansfield (Ed.), Frontiers of management. London: Routledge , 1989, pp. 247-261.
25.
CUZZORT, R. P. & KING, E. W.Twentieth century social thought. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston , 1980.
26.
CZARNIAWSKA-JOERGES, B.Rationality as an organizational product . Administrative Studies, 1992, 11(3), 152-162 .
27.
DAWE, A.The role of experience in the construction of social theory: An essay in reflexive sociology . Sociological Review, 1973, 21, 25-55 .
28.
DERRIDA, J.Of grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press , 1976.
GOODE, W. J. , & HATT, P.Methods of social research. New York: McGraw Hill , 1952.
44.
GOULDNER, A. W.The coming crisis in Western sociology. New York: Basic Books , 1970.
45.
GRAFTON-SMALL, R. Marketing Managers: The Evocation and Structure of Socially Negotiated Meaning. Unpublished PhD thesis, CNAA/Sheffield City Polytechnic, 1985.
46.
HADDEN, R. W.Artful fiction and adequate discourse: Irony and social theories of science . Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1992, 22(4), 421-439 .
47.
HAMMERSLEY, M.What's wrong with ethnography? The myth of theoretical description . Sociology, 1990, 24(4), 597-615 .
48.
HASSARD, J.An alternative to paradigm incommensurability in organization theory. In J. Hassard and D. Pym (Eds.), The theory and philosophy of organizations. London: Routledge , 1990, pp. 219-230.
49.
HASSARD, J.Multiple paradigm analysis: A methodology for management research. N. Craig Smith and P. Dainty (Eds.), The management research handbookLondon: Routledge , 1991, pp. 23-43.
50.
HEIDEGGER, M.On the way to language. New York: Harper & Row , 1971.
51.
HOPFL, H. J. , & LINSTEAD, S. A.Passion and performance: Suffering and the carrying of organizational roles. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion and organizations. Sage , 1993, pp. 76-93.
52.
KILDUFF, M.Deconstructing organizations . Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18(1), 13-31 .
53.
KLINKOWITZ, J.Literary disruptions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press , 1975.
54.
KOVESI, J.Moral notions. London: RKP , 1967.
55.
KUNDA, G.Engineering culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press , 1992.
56.
LASH, S.Reflexive modernization: The aesthetic dimension . Theory, culture and society, 1993, 10(1), 1-23 .
57.
LATOUR, B. , & WOOLGAR, S.Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage , 1979.
58.
LAWSON, H.Reflexivity: The post modem predicament. London: Hutchinson , 1985.
59.
LEACH, E.Political systems of highland Burma. London: Bill & Sons , 1954.
60.
LECERCLE, J. J.Philosophy through the looking-glass. London: Hutchinson , 1985.
61.
LETICHE, H.Having Taught Postmodernists . Paper presented to the Conference on Postmodern management-the Implications for Learning, EADA, Barcelona, 1989.
62.
LINSTEAD, S. A. Ambiguity in the Workplace. Unpublished PhD thesis, CNAA/Sheffield City Polytechnic, 1984.
63.
LINSTEAD, S. A.From postmodern anthropology to deconstructive ethnography . Human Relations, 1993, 46(1), 97-120 .
64.
LINSTEAD, S. A. , & GRAFTON-SMALL, R.Organizational bricolage . In B. A. Turner (Ed.), Organizational symbolism. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1990, pp. 291-309 . (a)
65.
LINSTEAD, S. A. , & GRAFTON-SMALL, R.Theory as artefact: Artefact as theory. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artefacts: Views of the corporate landscape. Berlin: de Gruyter , 1990, pp. 387-419. (b)
66.
LINSTEAD, S. A. , & GRAFTON-SMALL, R.On reading organizational culture . Organization Studies, 1992, 13(3), 331-355 .
67.
LYOTARD, J.-F.The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press , 1984.
68.
LYOTARD, J.-F. La faculte de juger. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1985.
69.
LYOTARD, J.-F.The sublime and the avant-garde. In A. Benjamin (Ed.), The Lyotard reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell , 1989, pp. 196-211. (a)
70.
LYOTARD, J.-F.The differend: Phases in dispute (translated by G. Van den Abbele). Minnesota: Minnesota Press , 1989. (b)
71.
LYOTARD, J.-F.The inhuman: Reflections on time (translated by G. Bennington and R. Bowlby). Stanford: Stanford University Press , 1991.
72.
MANGHAM, I.Power and performance in organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell , 1986.
73.
MARCUS, G. E. , & FISCHER, M. J.Anthropology as cultural critique. London: University of Chicago Press , 1986.
74.
McHUGH, P. , RAFFEL, S. , FOSS, D. C. , & BLUM, A. F.On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1974.
75.
MERLEAU-PONTY, M.Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press , 1979.
76.
MILLS, C. W.The sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press , 1959.
77.
MOORE, B.BBC Television Interview 4.3.80. discussing the ending of his novel. In An answer from limbo. London: Secker & Warburg , 1962.
78.
O'NEILL, J.Sociology as a skin trade. London: Heinemann , 1972.
PHILLIPS, D. L.Abandoning method. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 1973.
81.
PIRSIG, R.Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance. London: Corgi , 1976.
82.
ROSEN, M.Crashing in '87: Power and symbolism in the dow . In B. A. Turner (Ed.), Organizational symbolism. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1990, pp. 115-135 .
83.
ROSEN, M.Coming to terms with the field: Understanding and doing organizational ethnography . Journal of Management Studies, 1991, 28(1), 1-24 . (a)
84.
ROSEN, M.Scholars, travellers and thieves: On concept, method and cunning in organizational ethnography. In P. Frost , L. Moore , M. R. Louis , C. C. Lundberg , and J. Martin (Eds.), Reframing organizational culture. London: Sage , 1991, pp. 271-284. (b)
85.
ROSEN, M. , & MULLEN, T.There to here and no way back: An ethnographic study in the late life of a cocaine dealer. In S. Linstead , P. Jeffcutt , and R. Grafton-Small (Eds.), Understanding Management. London: Sage . Forthcoming.
86.
RUSTED, B. (Ed.). Studies in Advanced Critical Practice. Calgary: University of Calgary Press ,
87.
SANDELANDS, L. E. , & BUCKNER, G. C.Of art and work: Aesthetic experience and the psychology of work feelings. In Research in organizational behavior (Vol. II). Greenwich, CT, JAI Press , 1989, pp. 105-131.
88.
SARTRE, J-P.Nausea. London: Penguin Modern Classics , 1970.
89.
SCHUTZ, A.Collected papers. (Vol. I). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff , 1967.
90.
SELLITZ, C. , et al. , Research methods in the social sciences. New York, Holt Rinehart and Winston , 1962.
91.
SILVERMAN, D.Philosophy and meaning. In P. Filmer , M. Phillipson, Silverman , and D. Walsh (Eds.), New directions in sociological theory. London: Collier-MacMillan , 1972.
92.
SILVERMAN, D.Reading castaneda. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1975.
93.
SILVERMAN, D. , & TORODE, B.The material wordLondon: RKP , 1980.
94.
SMIRCICH, L.Is the concept of culture a paradigm for understanding organizations and ourselves? In P. Frost , L. F. Moore , M. R. Louis , C. C. Lundberg , and J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture. London: Sage , 1983, pp. 55-72.
95.
SMIRCICH, L. , & CALAS, M.Masquerade: Organizational culture as metafiction. In P. J. Frost , L. F. Moore , M. R. Louis , C. C. Lundberg , and J. Martin (Eds.), Reframing organizational culture. London: Sage , 1991, pp. 311-326.
96.
SOPER, K.Humanism and anti-humanism. London: Hutchinson , 1986.
STRATI, A.Aesthetic understanding of organizational life . Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(3), 568-581 .
99.
TANNER, T.City of words. London: Jonathan Cape , 1971.
100.
TRAVERS, A.Seeing through: Symbolic life and organization research in postmodern frame . In B. A. Turner (Ed.), Organizational symbolism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1990, pp. 271-289 .
101.
TSOUKAS, H.Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the critical systems perspective . Human Relations, 1992, 45(7), 637-657 .
102.
TURNER, B. A. , & GHERARDIS, S.Real men don't collect soft data. Quaderno 13: University of Trento , 1987.
103.
TYLER, S.The unspeakable. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press , 1987.
ULMER, G.Teletheory: Grammatology in the age of video. London; Routledge , 1989.
106.
VAN MAANEN, J. , & KUNDA, G.“Real feelings”: Emotional expression and organizational culture. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 11). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press , 1989, pp. 43-103.
107.
WATSON, T. J.The personnel manager. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1977.
108.
WHITLEY, R.The scientific status of management as a practically oriented social science . Journal of Management Studies, 1984, 21(4), 369-390 .
109.
WILLIS, P.Notes on method. In S. Hall , D. Hobson , A. Lowe , and P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language. London: Hutchinson , 1980, pp. 88-104.
110.
WIMSAIT, W. K.The verbal icon. London: Methuen, University Paperbacks , 1970.
111.
WITKIN, R. W.The aesthetic imperative of a rational-technical machinery: A study of organizational control through the design of artefacts. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter , 1990, pp. 325-338.
