We present a case study of a 5-year action research project in a 12-plant division of a multi-billion dollar firm. The division is attempting to design new plants and re-design all established plants as high involvement, high performance work systems (Lawler, 1986). The design process is based on a self-design learning model (Mohrman & Cummings, 1989). The history of the change process and data about its effects are reported. We review in detail how the self-design learning system is shaped by the nature of change in a large, multi-level, multi-site organization. We also consider the unusual role of the action researcher in large-scale change.
ARGYRIS, C., & SCHON, D. A.Participatory action research and action science compared. Amnerican Behavioral Scienuisi, 1989,.32(5), 612-623.
2.
BEER, M., EISENSTAT, R. A., & SPECTOR, B.The critical Path to corporate renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1990.
3.
CLARK, D, H., HOOPER, D. F., & GRAM, E. G.Creating a therapeutic community in a psychiatric ward. Hunman Relations, 1962, 15(2), 123-147.
4.
CUMMINGS, T. G., & MOHRMAN, S. A.Sell-designing organizations: Toward implementing quality of work life innovations. Research in Organizational Change and Development (Vol. 1). 1987, pp. 1275-1310.
5.
CUMMINGS, T. G., MOHRMAN, S. A., MOHRMAN, A. I., & LEDFORD, G. E., Jr.Organization design for the future: A collaborative approach. In E. E. Lawler, III, A. M. Mohrman, Jr., S. A. Mohrman, G. A. Ledford, Jr. and T. G. Cummings (Eds.), Doing research that is useful for theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
6.
GALBRAITH, J.R. (1989). From recovery to development through large-scale changes. In A. M. Mohrman Jr., S. A. Mohrman, G. E. Ledford. Jr., E. E. Lawler, Ill, and T. G. Cummings (Eds.), Large-scale orgaizizatioial Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
7.
HANNA, D. P.Designing organizations Jor high p/)efornianice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1988.
8.
KAHN. R. L.Conclusion: Critical themes in the study of change. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Change in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.
9.
LAWLER, E. E., III. High involvement Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
10.
LAWLER, E. E., III. Strategic choices for changing organizations. In A. M. Mohrman Jr., S. A. Mohrman, G. E., Ledford Jr., E. E., Lawler, T. G. Cummings (Eds.), Large-scale organizalional change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
11.
LEDFORD, G. E., Jr.Employee involvement: Lessons and predictions. In J. Galbraith and E. Lawler, III (Eds.), Organizing for the future: New approaches to managing complex organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. In press.
12.
LEDFORD, G. E., Jr., & BERGEL, G.Paying for skills in two food processing plants. Compensation and Benefits Review, 1991, 23(2), 24-38.
13.
LEDFORD, G. E., Jr., MOHRMAN, S. A., MOHRMAN, A. M., Jr., & LAWLER, E. E., III. The phenomenon of, large-scale organizational change. In A. I. Mohrman Jr., S. A. Mohrman, G. E. Ledford, Jr., E. E. Lawler,, III, and T. G. Cummings (Eds.), Large-scale organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
14.
LEDFORD, G. E. Jr., CUMMINGS, T. G., & WRIGHT, R. The structure and fuinctioning of high involvement oiganizations. Unpublished working paper, Los Angeles: Center for Effective Organizations, University of Southern California, 1991.
15.
LEWIN, K.Feedback problems of social diagnosis and action. Human Relalions, 1947, 1(1), 147-153.
16.
LEWIN, K.Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row, 1951.
17.
MACY, B. A., PETERSON, M. F., & NORTON, L. W.A test of participation theory in a work re-design field setting: Degree of participation and comparison site contrasts. Huminani Relations, 1989, 4(12), 1095-1165.
18.
MARCH, J. G., SPROULL, L. S., & TAMUZ, M.Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science, 199, 2(1), 1-13.
19.
MARROW, A. J., BOWERS, D., & SEASHORE, S. E.Management by participation. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.
20.
MOHRMAN, S. A. & CUMMINGS, T. G.Self-designing organizations: Learning how to create high peiformance. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
21.
MOHRMAN, A. M., & LAWLER, E. E., III. Tile diffusion of QWL as a paradigm shift. In W. G. Bennis, K. D. Benne, and R. Chin (Eds.), The Planning of Change (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1985.
22.
MOHRMAN, A. M., MOHRMAN, S. A., LEDFORD, G. E. Jr., LAWLER, E. E., III, & CUMMINGS, T. G.Large-scale organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
23.
PASMORE, W., & FRIEDLANDER, F.An action-research program for increasing employee involvement in problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27(3), 343-362.
24.
PETERS, M., & ROBINSON, V.The origins and status of action research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1984, 20(2), 113-124.
25.
PORRAS, J. I., & SILVERS, R. C.Organizational development and transformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 1991, 42, 51-57.
26.
RICE, A. K.Productivity and social oiganization. London: Tavistock, 1958.
27.
WALTON, R.E.The diffusion of new work structures: Explaining why success didn't take. Organizational Dynamics, Winter 1975, 3-22.
28.
WALTON, R. E.From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 1985, 63, 76-84.
29.
WHYTE, W. F.Action research for the twenty-first century: Participation, reflection, and practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 1989, 32(5).
