ANDERSON, J. C., & GERBING, D. W.Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 1988103, 411-423.
2.
BEDEIAN, A. G., & ARMENAKIS, A. A.A path-analytic study of the consequences of role conflict and ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24, 417-424.
3.
BEDEIAN, A. G., MOSSHOLDER, K. W., KEMERY, E. R., & ARMENAKIS, A. A.Replication requisites: A second look at Klenke-Hamel and Mathieu (1990). Human Relations, 1992, 45, 1093-1105.
4.
BOLLEN, K. A.Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
5.
GOLDBERG, D. P.The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
6.
HOTCHKISS, L.A technique for comparing path models between subgroups: Standardized path-regression coefficients. Sociological Methods and Research, 1976, 5, 53-76.
7.
HOUSE, R. J., & RIZZO, J. R.Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Peiformance, 1972, 7, 467-505.
8.
JACKSON, S. E.Participation in decision making as a strategy for reducing job-related strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983, 68, 3-19.
9.
JACKSON, S. E., & SCHULER, R. S.A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 36, 16-78.
10.
JAMES, L. R., MULAIK, S. A., & BRETT, J. E.Causal analysis: Assumptions, models and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982.
11.
JORESKOG, K. G., & SORBOM, D.LISREL VII Users Reference Guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, 1989.
12.
KAHN, R. L., WOLFE, D. M., QUINN, R. P., SNOEK, J. D., & ROSENTHAL, R. A.Organizational stress; Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley, 1964.
13.
KEMERY, E. R., BEDEIAN, A. G., MOSSHOLDER, K. W., & TOULIATOS, J.Outcomes of role stress: A multisample constructive replication. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28, 363-375.
14.
KLENKE-HAMEL, K. E., & MATHIEU, J. E.Role strains, tension, and job satisfaction influences on employees' propensity to leave: A multi-sample replication and extension. Human Relations, 1990, 43, 791-807.
15.
LYONS, T. F.Role clarity, need for clarity, satisfaction, tension, and withdrawal. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971, 6, 99-110.
MATHIEU, J. E.A cross-level nonrecursive model of the antecedents of organizational commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 607-618.
18.
MULAIK, S. A., JAMES, L. R., ALSTINE, J. V., BENNETT, N., LIND, S., & STILWELL, C. D.Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 1989, 105, 430-445.
19.
NETEMEYER, R. G., JOHNSTON, M. W., & BURTON, S.Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75, 148-157.
20.
RIZZO, J., HOUSE, R. J., & LIRTZMAN, S. I.Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1970, 15, 150-163.
21.
SOBEL, M. E., & BOHRNSTEDT, G. W.Use of null models in evaluating the fit of covariance structure models. In N. B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1984, pp. 152-178.
22.
SPECHT, C. A.On the evaluation of causal models. Social Science Research, 1975, 4, 113-133.
23.
STELZL, I.Changing a causal hypothesis without changing the fit: Some rules for generating equivalent path models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1986, 21, 309-331.
24.
WHEATON, B.Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. In J. S. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions: Avoiding error in quantitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.