Relationships among dyadic structure, the influence tactics used by managers, the communication media they employ, and perceived influence success were investigated in a field study. Surveyed managers (n = 139) responded to questions about their patterns of communication and influence with respect to a single other individual in the organization. Dyadic relationship (upward, downward, or horizontal) affected influence tactics and media usage; these behaviors in turn were found to be selectively related to influence success, depending on the dyadic relationship between agent and target of influence.
BARRY, B., & SHAPIRO, D. L.Toward a Reconceptualization of Social Influence in Organizations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco, 1990.
2.
BASS, B. M.Stodgill's handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press, 1984.
3.
BRASS, D. J.Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29, 518-539.
4.
BURLESON, B. R., WILSON, S. R., WALTMAN, M. S., GOERING, E. M., ELY, T. K., & WHALEY, B. B.Item desirability effects in compliance-gaining research: Seven studies documenting artifacts in the strategy selection procedure. Human Communication Research, 1988, 14, 429-486.
5.
CHAPANIS, A., OCHSMAN, R. B., PARRISH, R. N., & WEEKS, G. D.Studies in interactive communication: The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem-solving. Human Factors, 1972, 14, 487-509.
6.
COBB, A.Informal influence in the formal organization: Perceived sources of power among work unit peers. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23, 155-161.
7.
CULNAN, M. J., & MARKUS, M. L.Information technologies. In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, and L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987.
8.
DAFT, R. L., & LENGEL, R. H.Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984.
9.
DAFT, R. L., & LENGEL, R. H.Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 1986, 32, 554-571.
10.
EMERSON, R. M.Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 31-41.
11.
EREZ, M., RIM, Y., & KEIDER, I.The two sides of the tactics of influence: Agent vs. target. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1986, 59, 25-39.
12.
ERICKSON, B. H.The relational basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
13.
FALCIONE, R. L., SUSSMAN, L., & HERDEN, R. P.Communication climate in organizations. In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, and L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987.
14.
FOMBRUN, C. J.Attributions of power across a social network. Human Relations, 1983, 36, 493-508.
15.
FRANKLIN, J. L.Down the organization: influence processes across levels of hierarchy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 153-164.
16.
FROST, P. J.Power, politics, and influence. In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, and L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987.
17.
HEGTVEDT, K. A.Social determinants of perception: Power, equity, and status effects in an exchange situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1988, 51, 141-153.
18.
HINKIN, T. R., & SCHRIESHEIM, C. A.How Subordinates Influence Their Superiors: Critique, Investigation, and Refinement of Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson's Subscales. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, 1986.
19.
HINKIN, T. R., & SCHRIESHEIM, C. A.Relationships between subordinate perceptions of supervisor influence tactics and attributed bases of supervisory power. Human Relations, 1990, 43, 221-237.
20.
HOUSE, R. J., & BAETZ, M. L.Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. In B. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1979.
21.
HUNTER, J. E., & BOSTER, F. J.A model of compliance-gaining message selection. Communication Monographs, 1987, 54, 63-84.
22.
JABLIN, F. M.Superior-subordinate communication: The state of the art. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 1201-1222.
23.
KIESLER, S., SIEGEL, J., & McGUIRE, T. W.Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 1984, 39, 1123-1134.
24.
KIPNIS, D., & SCHMIDT, S. M.Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1988, 33, 528-542.
25.
KIPNIS, D., SCHMIDT, S. M., & WILKINSON, I.Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 198O, 65, 440-452.
26.
KLEINBAUM, D. G., KUPPER, L. L., & MULLER, K. E.Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston: PWS-KENT, 1988.
27.
MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A.Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1958.
28.
MARKUS, M. L.Information Richness Theory, Managers, and Electronic Mail. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, California, 1988.
29.
MONGE, P. R., EDWARDS, J. A., & KIRSTE, K. K.The determinants of communication and communication structure in large organizations: A review of research. In B. D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1978.
30.
MOWDAY, R. T.The exercise of upward influence in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 137-156.
31.
MOWDAY, R. T.Leader characteristics, self-confidence, and methods of upward influence in organizational decision situations. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 709-725.
32.
PEDHAZUR, E. J.Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1983.
33.
PORTER, L. W., ALLEN, R. W., & ANGLE, H. L.The politics of upward influence in organizations. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1981.
34.
PUTNAM, L. L., & WILSON, C. E.Communicative strategies in organizational conflicts: Reliability and validity of a measurement scale. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982.
35.
SCHILIT, W. K., & LOCKE, E. A.A study of upward influence in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27, 304-316.
36.
SCHRIESHEIM, C., & KERR, S.Theories and measures of leadership: A critical appraisal of current and future directions. In J. Hunt and L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977.
37.
STOHL, C., & REDDING, W. C.Messages and message exchange processes. In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, and L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987.
38.
TOMPKINS, P. K.The functions of human communication in organization. In C. Arnold and J. Bowers (Eds.), Handbook of rhetorical and communication theory. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1984.
39.
TREVINO, L. K., LENGEL, R. H., BODENSTEINER, W., & GERLOFF, E.Managerial Media Choice: The Interactive Influences of Cognitive Style and Message Equivocality. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, California, 1988.
40.
VECCHIO, R. P., & SUSSMANN, M.Preferences for forms of supervisory social influence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1989, 10, 135-143.
41.
WALTER, B.Internal control relations in administrative hierarchies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1966, 11, 179-206.
42.
WORTMAN, C. B., & LINSENMEIER, J. A. W.Interpersonal attraction and techniques of ingratiation in organizational settings. In B. M. Staw and G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger, 1977.
43.
YUKL, G., & FALBE, C. M.Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75, 132-140.
