In living systems that are experiencing highly turbulent conditions, dissipative self-organization sometimes takes place and results in greater viability. The potential applications of the paradigm of dissipative self-organization to the study of change dynamics in small groups are explored. A certain type of change in groups is likened to change in dissipative structures found in the physical world, and group effectiveness amid complex and turbulent environments is seen to require the key elements of dissipative self-organization: an ongoing tolerance for error and for deviation from an established order, a breaking of existing system relationships so that new ones may emerge, a reflective, self-referencing mode, and a creative process of boundary reparation and movement into new configurations. Lewin's model of change in social systems is extended here through the application of the self-organization paradigm. Instead of utilizing Lewin's formulation of a discrete movement through phases, the emphasis is placed on continual change taking place amid turbulence or near-chaos conditions. The group's ability to be self-organizing, by opening to turbulence and functioning at its boundaries, and by experimenting, self-referencing, and repairing boundaries is discussed as a crucial factor in group effectiveness amid such conditions.
ACKOFF, R.Creating the corporate future. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981.
2.
ALDERFER, C. P.Change processes in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organization psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Co., 1976, pp. 1591-1638.
3.
ASHBY, W. R.Design for a brain (3rd ed.). London: Methuen, 1970.
4.
BEER, S.Diagnosing the system for organizations. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.
5.
BENNIS, W., & SHEPARD, H.A theory of group development. Human Relations, 1956, 9(4), 415-457.
6.
BERTINE, E.Human relationships-In the family, in friendship, in work. New York: David McKay & Co., 1958.
7.
BION, W. R.Experiences in groups and other papers. New York: Basic Books, 1961.
8.
BOHM, D.Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.
9.
BRAATEN, L. J.Developmental phases of encounter groups and related intensive groups. Interpersonal Development, 1974-1975, 5, 112-129.
10.
BRIGGS, J., & PEAT, F.The turbulent mirror. New York: Harper and Row, 1989.
11.
BRONOWSKI, J.New concepts in the evolution of complexity. Syntheses, 1970, 21, 228-246.
12.
CARTWRIGHT, D., & ZANDER, A.Group dynamics: Research and theory. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.
13.
CHURCHMAN, C. W.The systems approach. New York: Dell, 1968.
14.
CHURCHMAN, C. W. President's Address: Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences. Portland, Oregon, 1990 (unpublished).
15.
CIBORRA, C., MIGLIARESE, P., & ROMANO, P.A methodological inquiry of organizational noise in sociotechnical systems. Human Relations, 1984, 37(8), 565-588.
16.
COOPER, C., & GUSTAFSON, J.Family group development: Planning in organizations. Human Relations, 1981, 34(8), 705-730.
17.
FREUD, S.Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. New York: Bantam Books, 1965.
18.
GEMMILL, G.The mythology of the leader role in small groups. Small Group Behavior, 1986, 17(1), 41-50.
19.
GEMMILL, G., & SMITH, C.A dissipative structure model of organization transformation. Human Relations, 1985, 38(8), 751-566(???).
20.
GIBB, J., & GIBB, L.The process of group actualization. In J. Akin (Ed.), Language behavior. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton, 1971, pp. 171-187.
21.
GLEICK, J.Chaos. New York: Penguin, 1987.
22.
GOLEMAN, D.Vital lies, simple truths. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1985.
23.
GOLEMBIEWSKI, R., BILLINGSLEY, K., & YEAGER, S.Measuring change by persistence in human affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975, 12(2), 133-157.
24.
HAKEN, H.Synergetics: Nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry and biology. New York: Springer, 1977.
25.
HEDBERG, B., NYSTROM, P., & STARBUCK, W.Camping on seesaws: prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 41-65.
26.
HIRSCHHORN, L.The workplace within. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1988.
27.
ILLING, H. C. G.Jung on the present trends in group psychotherapy. Human Relations, 1957, X(1), 5-9.
28.
JANTSCH, E.The self-organizing universe. New York: Pergamon Press, 1980.
JUNG, C., VON FRANZ, M., & HENDERSON, J.Man and his symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964.
31.
KIRTON, M.Adapters and innovators-why new initiatives get blocked. Long Range Planning, 1984, 17, 137-143.
32.
LEIFER, R.Understanding organizational transformation using a dissipative structure model. Human Relations, 1989, 42(2), 899-916.
33.
LESSING, D.Prisons we choose to live inside. New York: Harper and Row. 1987.
34.
LEWIN, K.Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1947, 1, 2-38.
35.
LOYE, D., & EISLER, R.Chaos and transformation: Implications of non-equilibrium theory for social science and society. Behavioral Science, 1987, 32, 53-65.
36.
MARCH, J. B.Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26, 563-577.
37.
MARUYAMA, M.The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 1963, 51, 164-179.
38.
MASON, R., & MITROFF, I.Challenging strategic planning assumptions. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1981.
39.
MATURANA, H., & VARELA, F.The tree of knowledge. Boston: Shambala Publications, 1987.
40.
MITROFF, I.Archetypal social systems analysis: On the deeper structure of human systems. Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8(3), 387-397.
41.
MORGAN, G.Images of organizations. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, 1986.
42.
NICHOLIS, G., & PRIGOGINE, I.Self-organization in non-equilibrium systems. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1977.
43.
PENROSE, R.The emperor's new mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
44.
Random house dictionary of the English language (2nd ed.). New York: Random House, 1987.
45.
REISS, D.The family's construction of reality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1981.
46.
RUBIN, J., & BROCKNER, J.Factors affecting entrapment in waiting situations: The Rosencrantz and Guildenstern effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31(6), 1054-1063.
47.
SAHAL, D.Patterns of technological innovation. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley, 1981.
48.
SHAPIRO, R. L.Family dynamics and object relations theory: An analytic group-interpretative approach to family therapy. In A. Colman and M. Geller (Eds.), Group relations reader 2. Washington, D.C.: A. K. Rice Institute, 1985.
49.
SHEPARD, H.On the realization of human potential: A path with a heart. In M. Arthur, L. Bailyn, and D. Levinson (Eds.), Working with careers. New York: Columbia University School of Business, 1984, pp. 25-46.
50.
SMITH, C. A Psychodynamic Model of Group Work Task Effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, 1985.
51.
SMITH, C.Transformation and regeneration in social systems: A dissipative structure perspective. Systems Research, 1986, 3(4), 203-213.
