Individual and/or group autonomy have long been considered critical dimensions of job design in participative work settings. Autonomy has typically been defined as discretion over pace of work and work methods (Hackman & Oldham, 1980), and in an effort to provide autonomy, buffers have traditionally been inserted into the work flow to break task interdependencies. The use of such buffers, however, runs counter to today's new manufacturing practices of just-in-time (JIT) inventory and standardized work. This paper, therefore, examines the effects of introducing such practices on levels of autonomy in different operations. In mature sociotechnical plants where employees have become accustomed to independent decision making, the introduction of process controls can diminish individual autonomy. But, there is an opportunity to exchange individual decision making with a form of collective autonomy which is limited to task design as opposed to task execution. Furthermore, individuals can still retain autonomy in cases where it does not affect the overall coordination of production activity. Last, the introduction of new process controls offers the opportunity for participative decision making in situations where hierarchical centralized decision making was once the norm.
BEER, M., & SPECTOR, B.Sedalia Engine Plant (A). Harvard Business School Case No. 481-148, 1981.
2.
BLAUNER, R.Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press, 1964.
3.
CHAPMAN, S., & SCHMINKE, M. Operating uncertainty, JIT manufacturing, and departmental structure: A theoretical approach. University of Iowa, unpublished manuscript, 1987.
4.
CUMMINGS, T. G., & SRIVASTVA, S.Management of work: A socio-technical systems approach. San Diego, California: University Associates, 1977.
5.
DAVIS, L. E., & TAYLOR, J. C.Technology effects on job, work, and organizational structure: A contingency view. In L. E. Davis, A. B. Cherns, and Associates (Eds.), The quality of working life, Volume one: Problems, prospects and the state of the art. New York: The Free Press, 1975.
6.
DUNBAR, R. L. M.Designs for organizational control. In W. Starbuck and P. Nystrom (Eds.), Handbook of organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
7.
EMERY, F. E., & THORSRUD, E.Form and content in industrial democracy. London: Tavistock, 1969.
8.
EMERY, F. E., & THORSRUD, E.Democracy at work. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.
9.
EMERY, F. E., & TRIST, E. L.Socio-technical systems. In C. W. Churchman and M. Verhurst (Eds.), Management science, models, and techniques. London: Pergamon Press, 1960.
10.
EMERY, F. E., & TRIST, E. L.Sociotechnical systems. In F. E. Emery (Ed.), Systems thinking. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1969.
11.
EMERY, F. E., & TRIST, E. L.Analytical model for sociotechnical systems. In W. A. Pasmore and J. J. Sherwood (Eds.), Sociotechnical systems: A sourcebook. La Jolla, California: University Associates, 1978.
GULOWSEN, J.A measure of work-group autonomy. In L. W. Davis and J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design ofjobs. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1972.
14.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G.Work redesign. Reading, Massachusetts: AddisonWesley, 1980.
15.
HACKMAN, J. R., & WALTON, R. E.Implications of management strategy in groups in organizations. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 786-007, July 1985.
16.
HALL, R. W.Zero inventories. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1983.
17.
HALL, R. W.Attaining manufacturing excellence: Just-in-time, total quality, total people involvement. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1987.
18.
HAYES, R. H., WHEELWRIGHT, S. C., & CLARK, K. B.Dynamic manufacturing: Creating the learning organization. New York: The Free Press, 1988.
19.
HERBST, P. G.Autonomous group functioning. London: Tavistock, 1962.
20.
HERRICK, N. Q., & MACCOBY, M.Humanizing work: A priority of the 1970's. In L. E. Davis, A. B. Cherns, and Associates (Eds.), The quality of working life, Volume one: Problems, prospects and the state of the art. New York: The Free Press, 1975.
21.
KLEIN, J. A.Sedalia Revisited. Harvard Business School Case No. 687-004, 1986.
22.
KLEIN, J. A.The human costs of manufacturing reform. Harvard Business Review, March-April 1989.
23.
KLEIN, J. A., & SHERRY, S.Tektronix: JIT and PI. Harvard Business School Case No. 689-006, 1988.
24.
MANZ, C. C.Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11.
25.
MANZ, C. C., & SIMS, H. P., Jr.Superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1989.
26.
MILES, R. E.Theories of management: Implications for organizational behavior and development. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
27.
MILLS, P. K.Self-management: Its control and relationship to other organizational properties. Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8.
28.
MONDEN, Y.Toyota production system: Practical approach to production management. Atlanta, Georgia: Industrial Engineering and Management Press, 1983.
29.
ODAKA, K.Towards industrial democracy management and workers in modern Japan. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1975.
30.
PLOWMAN, D. H., & FORD, G. W.Employee participation in Japan. In E. David and R. Lansbury (Eds.), Democracy and control in the workplace. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire, 1986.
31.
RUNCIE, J. F.By day I make cars. Harvard Business Review, May-June 1980.
32.
SANDBERG, T.Work organization and autonomous groups. Uppsala, Sweden: LiberForlag, 1982.
33.
SCHONBERGER, R. J.Japanese manufacturing techniques: Nine hidden lessons in simplicity. New York: The Free Press, 1982.
34.
SCHONBERGER, R. J.World class manufacturing: The lessons of simplicity applied. New York: The Free Press, 1986.
35.
SLOCUM, J. W., & SIMS, H. P., Jr.A typology for integrating technology, organization and job design. Human Relations, 1980, 33.
36.
SUSMAN, G. I.Technological prerequisites for delegation of decision making to work groups. In L. E. Davis, A. B. Cherns, and Associates (Eds.), The quality of working life, Volume one: Problems, prospects and the state of the art. New York: The Free Press, 1975.
37.
SUSMAN, G. I.Autonomy at work: A sociotechnical analysis of participative management. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1979.
38.
THOMPSON, J. D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
39.
TRIST, E. L., HIGGIN, G. W., MURRAY, H., & POLLOCK, A. B.Organizational choice. London: Tavistock, 1963.
40.
WALTON, R. E.From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, March-April 1985.
