How employees depend and interact with each other can affect their ability to solve problems and implement innovations. Fifty retail store personnel were interviewed on specific difficulties they had to cope with as they used their new laser scanning technology. Results indicate that cooperative goals and interaction contributed to progress, efficiency, and confidence. The study identifies antecedents to cooperative and competitive goals and categorizes and describes cooperative and competitive problem-solving behaviors and their consequences on the organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BARKER, J., TJOSVOLD, D., & ANDREWS, I. R.Conflict approaches of effective and ineffective managers: A field study in a matrix organization. Journal of Management Studies, 1988, 25, 167-178.
2.
COCH, L., & FRENCH, J. R. P., Jr.Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1948, 1, 512-532.
3.
CYERT, R. M., & MARCH, J. G.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
4.
DEUTSCH, M.A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 1949, 2, 129-152.
5.
DEUTSCH, M.The resolution of conflict. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1973.
FUNDER, D. C., & DOBROTH, K. M.Differences between traits: Properties associated with intergroup agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52, 409-418.
8.
JANZ, T., & TJOSVOLD, D.Costing effective vs. ineffective work relationships. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 1985, 2, 43-51.
9.
JOHNSON, D. W., MARUYAMA, G., JOHNSON. R. T., NELSON, D., & SKON, S.Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 89, 47-62.
10.
JOHNSON, D. W., JOHNSON, R. T., & MARUYAMA, G.Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Review of Education Research, 1983, 53, 5-54.
11.
LOCKE, E. A., SCHWEIGER, D. M., & LATHAM, G. P.Participation in decision making: When should it be used?Organizational Dynamics, 1986, 14(3), 65-79.
12.
LORD, R. G.An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7), Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1985, pp. 87-128.
13.
MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
14.
NEWELL, A., & SIMON, H. A.Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: PrenticeHall, 1972.
15.
NUTT, P. C.Tactics of implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29, 230-261.
16.
PETERS, T., & WATERMAN, R.In search of excellence. New York: Harper, 1982.
17.
PINFIELD, L. T.A field evaluation of perspectives on organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 365-388.
18.
PODSAKOFF, P. M., & ORGAN, D. W.Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 1986, 12, 531-544.
SCHULTZ, R. L., & SLEVIN, P. O.Implementing operations research/management science. New York: Elsevier, 1975.
21.
SHRAUGER, J. S., & OSBERG, T. M.The relative accuracy of self-predictions and judgments by others in psychological assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90, 322-351.
22.
SPECTOR, P. E.Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72, 438-443.
23.
TICHY, N. M., & DEVANNA, M. A.The transformational leader. New York: Wiley, 1986.
24.
TJOSVOLD, D.Cooperation theory and organizations. Human Relations, 1984, 37, 743-767.
25.
TJOSVOLD, D.Dynamics within participation: An experimental examination. Group and Organizational Studies, 1985, 10, 260-277. (a)
26.
TJOSVOLD, D.Implications of controversy for management. Journal of Management, 1985, 11, 21-37. (b)
27.
TJOSVOLD, D.Dynamics of interdependence in organizations. Human Relations, 1986, 39, 517-540. (a)
28.
TJOSVOLD, D.Working together to get things done: Managing for organizational productivity. Lexington, Massachusetts: Heath, 1986. (b)
29.
TJOSVOLD, D.Participation: A close look at its dynamics. Journal of Management, 1987, 13, 739-750.
30.
TJOSVOLD, D.Team organization: An enduring competitive advantage. London: Wiley. In press.
31.
TJOSVOLD, D., & McNEELY, L. T.Innovation through communication in an educational bureaucracy. Communication Research, 1988, 15, 568-581.
32.
VAN DE VEN, A. H.Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 1986, 32, 590-607.
33.
VROOM V. H., & YETTON, P. W.Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973.
34.
WATSON, D., & TELLEGEN, A.Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 1985, 98, 219-235.
35.
ZAND, D. E., & SORENSEN, R. E.Theory of change and the effective use of management science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 532-545.
