It is noted that the authoritarian personality theory of Adorno et al. is now seldom referred to in race relations research and that the scale used to operationalize the theory (the Fscale) is a very poor measure of what it purports to measure (right-wing authoritarianism). The Fscale does have many correlates, however, and the work of Pflaum is referred to support the contention that the F scale in fact taps an old-fashioned orientation. A large correlational study by Kline and Cooper is reinterpreted in this light and it is shown that when pejorative assumptions are discarded, the old-fashioned person would appear to have many potentially admirable characteristics. The new understanding of what the F scale measures is also shown to be helpful in making sense of the findings from many other studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADORNO, T. W., FRENKEL-BRUNSWIK, E., LEVINSON, D. J., & SANFORD, R. N.The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper, 1950.
2.
ALTEMEYER, R.Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba press, 1981.
3.
ALWIN, D. F.From obedience to autonomy: Changes in traits desired in children 1924-1978. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1988, 52,33-52.
4.
BETTELHEIM, B.Individual and mass behavior in extreme situations. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1943, 38,417-452.
5.
BREWER, M. B., & KRAMER, R. M.The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 1985, 36,219-243.
6.
BROWN, R.Social psychology. New York: Free Press, 1965.
7.
BROWN, R.Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press, 1986.
8.
CAMPBELL, D. T., SIEGMAN, C. R., & REES, M. B.Direction of wording effects in the relationship between scales. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 68,293-303.
9.
CHRISTIE, R., & JAHODA, M.Studies in the scope and method of "the authoritarian personality. "Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1954.
10.
COBAS, J. A.Puerto-Rican reactions to Cuban migrants: Insights from trading minority interpretations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1986, 9, 529-536.
11.
CROSBY, F., BROMLEY, S., & SAXE, L.Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87, 546-563.
12.
DAVISON, M. L., & SRICHANTRA, M.Acquiescence in components analysis and multidimensional scaling of self-rating items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1988, 12,339-351.
13.
De MAN, A. F.Parental control in childrearing and conservatism in young adult women. Psychological Reports, 1985, 56, 145-146.
14.
DOISE, W.Nouvelle recherches sur les relations intergroupes. Psychologie Francaise, 1985, 30, 141-146.
15.
DUCKITT, J.Culture, class, personality and authoritarianism among White South Africans. Journal of Social Psychology, 1983, 121, 191-199.
16.
DUPUY, T. N.Mythos or verity? The quantified judgment model and German combat effectiveness. Military Affairs, 1986, 50(4), 204-210.
17.
EYSENCK, H. J.The psychology of politics. London: Routledge, 1954.
18.
EYSENCK, H. J., & EYSENCK, S. B. G.Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1976.
19.
FELLING, A., & PETERS, J.Conservatism: A multidimensional cocept. Netherlands Journal of Sociology, 1986, 22,36-60.
20.
FISHER, W. A., BYRNE, D., WHITE, L. A., AND KELLEY, K.Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. Journal of Sex Research, 1988, 25,123-151.
21.
GABENNESCH, H.Authoritarianism as world view. American Journal of Sociology, 1972, 77, 857-875.
22.
GARCIA, L. T., & GRIFFITT, W.Evaluation and recall of evidence: Authoritarianism and the Patty Hearst case. Journal of Research in Personality, 1978, 12, 57-67.
23.
HANSON, D. J.Authoritarianism as a variable in political research. Il Politico, 1975, 40, 700-705.
24.
HARTMANN, P.A perspective on the study of social attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1977, 7, 85-96.
25.
HEAVEN, P. C. L.Authoritarianism or acquiescence? South African findings. Journal of Social Psychology, 1983, 119,11-15.
JACKSON, D. N.Acquiescence response styles: Problems of identification and control. In I. A. Berg (Ed.), Response set in personality measurement. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
28.
JAENSCH, E. R.Der Gegentypus. Leipzig: Barth, 1938.
29.
KATZ, I., & BENJAMIN, L.Effects of White authoritarianism in bi-racial work groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 448-456.
30.
KELLEY, K.Sex, sex-guilt and authoritarianism: Differences in response to explicit heterosexual and masturbatory styles. Journal of Sex Research, 1985, 21, 68-85.
31.
KELLEY, K.Critique of "Sexual liberation, old-fashioned outlook and authoritarianism": A reply to Ray. Journal of Sex Research, 1989, 26,141-143.
32.
KLINE, P., & COOPER, C.A factorial analysis of the authoritarian personality. British Journal of Psychology, 1984, 75, 171-176.
33.
KOOMEN, W.A note on the authoritarian German family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 1974, 36, 634-636.
34.
LARSEN, K. S., REED, M., & HOFFMAN, S.Attitudes of heterosexuals towards homosexuals: A Likert-type scale and construct validity. Journal of Sex Roles, 1980, 16, 245-257.
35.
LENTZ, T. E., Jr., & COLLEAGUES. Manualfor C-R opinionnaire. St. Louis: Washington University Character Research Institute, 1935.
36.
LIPSET, S. M.Democracy and working class authoritarianism. American Sociological Review, 1959, 24,482-502.
37.
LIPSET, S. M.Political man. New York: Doubleday, 1960.
38.
MAIER, R. A., & LAVRAKIS, P. J.Attitudes towards women, personality rigidity and idealized physique preferences in males. Sex Roles, 1984, 11,(5-6), 425-433.
39.
McABEE, T. A., & CAFFERTY, T. P.Degree of prescribed punishment as a function of subjects' authoritarianism and offenders' race and social status. Psychological Reports, 1982, 50,651-654.
40.
McKINNEY, D. W.The authoritarian personality studies. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.
41.
MELOEN, J. D., HAGENDOORN, L., RAAIJMAKERS, Q., & VISSER, L.Authoritarianism and the revival of political racism: Reassessment in the Netherlands of the reliability and validity of the concept of authoritarianism by Adorno et al. Political Psychology, 1988, 9, 413-429.
42.
MERCER, G. W., & KOHN, P. M.Child-rearing factors, authoritarianism, drug-use attitudes, and adolescent drug use: A model. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1980, 136,159-171.
43.
MESSICK, D. M. & MACKIE, D. M.Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 1989, 40, 45-81.
44.
MILBRATH, L. W.Latent origins of liberalism-conservatism and party identification: A research note. Journal of Politics, 1962, 24, 679-688.
45.
PEABODY, D.Authoritarianism scales and response bias. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 65,11-23.
46.
PFLAUM, J.Development and evaluation of equivalent forms of the F scale. Psychology Reports, 1964, 15,663-669.
47.
PROCTOR, R.Racial hygeine: Medicine under the Nazis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard U.P., 1988.
48.
RAY, J. J.A new balanced F scale-And its relation to social class. Australian Psychologist, 1972, 7, 155-166.
49.
RAY, J. J.Conservatism, authoritarianism and related variables: A review and an empirical study. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), The psychology of conservatism (Chap. 2): London: Academic Press, 1973. (a)
50.
RAY, J. J.Dogmatism and subtypes of conservatism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1973, 3, 221-232. (b)
51.
RAY, J. J.Conservatism as heresy. Sydney: A. N. Z. Book Co., 1974.
52.
RAY, J. J.Is the Dogmatism scale irreversible?South African Journal of Psychology, 1979, -9, 104-107.
53.
RAY, J. J.Authoritarianism in California 30 years later-with some cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Social Psychology, 1980, 111,9-17.
54.
RAY, J. J.The workers are not authoritarian: Attitude and personality data from six countries. Sociology and Social Research, 1983. (a)
55.
RAY, J. J.Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. Journal of Social Psychology, 1983, 121,81-96. (b)
56.
RAY, J. J.Half of all authoritarians are Left-wing: A reply to Eysenck and Stone. Political Psychology, 1983, 4, 139-144. (c)
57.
RAY, J. J.Half of all racists are left-wing. Political Psychology, 1984, 5, 227-236.
58.
RAY, J. J.The psychopathology of the political Left. High School Journal, 1985, 68,415-423. (a)
59.
RAY, J. J.Acquiescent response bias as a recurrent psychometric disease: Conservatism in Japan, the U.S.A. and New Zealand. Psychologische Beitraege, 1985, 27,113-119. (b)
60.
RAY, J. J.What old people believe: Age, sex and conservatism. Political Psychology, 1985, 6, 525-528. (c)
61.
RAY, J. J.Intolerance of ambiguity among psychologists: A comment on Maier and Lavrakas. Sex Roles, 1987, 16, 559-562.
62.
RAY, J. J.Why the F scale predicts racism: A critical review. Political Psychology, 1988, 9(4), 671-679.
63.
RAY, J. J., & LOVEJOY, F. H.The behavioral validity of some recent measures of authoritarianism. Journal of Social Psychology, 1983, 120, 91-99.
64.
RAY, J. J., & PRATT, G. J.Is the influence of acquiescence on "catchphrase" type attitude scale items not so mythical after all?Australian Journal of Psychology, 1979, 31, 73-78.
65.
ROBERTS, R. E., FORTHOFER, R. N., & FABREGA, H.The Langner items and acquiescence. Social Science and Medicine, 1976, 10(2), 69-75.
66.
ROKEACH, M.The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
67.
RULE, B. G., HALEY, H., & McCORMACK, J.Anti-Semitism, distraction, and physical aggression. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1971, 3, 174-178.
68.
SEARS, D. O.College sophomores in the laboratory Influences of a narrow database on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 515-530.
69.
SIEGEL, J. M., & MITCHELL, H. E.The influences of expectancy violations, sex, and authoritarianism on simulated trial outcomes. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1979, 10, 37-47.
70.
SNIDERMAN, P. M., & TETLOCK, P. E.Reflections on American racism. Journal of Social Issues, 1986, 42, 173-187.
71.
STEPHAN, W. G., & ROSENFIELD, D.Effects of desegregation on racial attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 795-804.
