Recent studies have argued that the variety of organizational forms is limited and that certain common organizational configurations-alignments among strategy, structure and environment-occur with remarkable frequency and account-for a very significant fraction of organizations. This has been demonstrated empirically. The purpose of this paper is to probe into the cohesion, dynamics, and predictive implications of configurations. Ten propositions are derived by analyzing some representative configurations. It is proposed that the constrained variety and cohesion of configurations are caused by the interdependent, robust, cyclical, and reciprocal relationships among their parts. It is also argued that configurations vary in their first-order changes, but that all resist second-order changes, that is, changes in the direction of evolution. This makes them prone to long periods of momentum punctuated by brief periods of revolution. Finally, configurations are shown to vary in their internal relationships so that classification must precede prediction in organizational analysis. This suggests a middle range approach to paradigm development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALDRICH, H. A.Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall , 1979.
2.
ANSOFF, H. I.Corporate strategy. NY: McGraw-HUI , 1965.
3.
ARGYRIS. C. , & SCHON, D.Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley , 1977.
4.
ASTLEY, G. , & VAN DEN VEN, A.Central perspectives and debates in organization theory . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 245-273 .
5.
BLAU, P. M.7he dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1955.
6.
BUCHELE, R.Business policy in growing /ums. San Francisco: Chandler , 1967.
7.
BURNS, T. , & STALKER, G.The management of innovation. London: Tavistock , 1961.
GARTNER, W. An Empirical Model of the Business Startup, and Eight Enterpreneurial Archetypes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 1982.
19.
GOULDNER, A.Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. N.Y.: Free Press , 1954.
20.
GULICK, L. H. , & URWICK, L. F.Papers on the science of administration. N.Y.: Columbia University Press , 1937-1938.
21.
HAMBRICK, D. C.Environmental scanning and organizational strategy . Strategic Management Journal, 1982, 3, 159-173 .
22.
HAMBRICK, D. C.Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy . Journal of Management, 1984, 10, 27-43 .
23.
HANNAN, M. T. , & FREEMAN, J. H.The population ecology of organizations . American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82, 929-964 .
24.
HANNAN, M. T. , & FREEMAN, J. H.Structural inertia and organizational change . American Sociological Review, 1984, 49, 149-164 .
25.
HININGS, R. , GREENWOOD, R. , RANSON, S. , & WALSH, K.Reform, Reorientation, and Change: The Designing of Organizational Change. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Commerce, University of Alberta, Edmonton , 1984.
26.
HOLSTI, O.Crisis, escalation, war. Montreal: McGill-Queens Press , 1972.
27.
KATZ, D. , & KAHN, R.The social psychology of organizations. N.Y.: Wiley , 1966.
28.
KETS DE VRIES, M. , & MILLER, D.Personality, culture and organization . Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11, 266-279 .
29.
KHANDWALLA, P. N.The design of organizations. N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace, Janovich , 1977.
30.
KIMBERLY, J. , & MILES, R.The organizational life cycle. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 1980.
31.
LAMPEL, J. , & MINTZBERG, H.Customizing Strategy. Working paper, Faculty of Management, McGill University , 1987.
32.
LAWRENCE, P. R. , & LORSCH, J.Organization and environment. Boston: Harvard , 1967.
33.
MARCH, J. G. , & SIMON, H.Organizations. N.Y. : 1958.
34.
McKELVEY, B.Organizational systematics. Berkeley: University of California Press , 1982.
35.
MERTON, R. K.Bureaucratic structure and personality . Social Forces, 1940, 18, 560-568 .
36.
MILES, R. E. , & SNOW, C.Organizational strategy, structure and performance. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill , 1978.
37.
MILLER, D.The correlates of enterpreneurship in three types of firms . Management Science, 1983, 29, 770-791 .
38.
MILLER, D.Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance . Academy of Management Journal, 1987, 30, 7-32 . (a)
39.
MILLER, D.The genesis of configuration . Academy of Management Review, 1987, 12, 686-701 . (b)
40.
MILLER, D.The relationship of Porter's business strategies to environment and structure . Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31, 280-308 .
41.
MILLER, D.The Icarus paradox: How exceptional companies bring about their own decline. N.Y.: Harper & Row , 1990.
42.
MILLER, D. , & DROGE, C.Psychological and traditional determinants of structure . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 539-560 .
43.
MILLER, D. , & FRIESEN, P. H.Momentum and revolution in organizational adaption . Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23, 591-614 .
44.
MILLER, D. , & FRIESEN, P. H.Organizations: A quantum view. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall , 1984.
45.
MILLER, D. , & TOULOUSE, J. M.CEO personality and its relationship to strategy and structure . Management Science, 1986, 32, 1389-1409 .
46.
MILLER, D. , KETS DE VRIES, M. , & TOULOUSE, J. M.Locus of control and its relationship to strategy, environment and structure . Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 237-253 .
47.
MINTZBERG, H.Strategy making in three modes . California Management and Review, 1973, 16, 44-58 .
48.
MINTZBERG, H.The structure of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall , 1979.
49.
NELSON, R. , & WINTER, S. G.An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press , 1982.
PINDER, C. , & MOORE, L.The resurrection of taxonomy to aid in the development of middle range theories of organizational behavior . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 99-118 .
52.
PORTER, M. E.Competitive strategy. N.Y.: Free Press , 1980.
53.
PUGH, D. , HICKSON, D. J. , HININGS, C. R. , & TURNER, C.Dimensions of organizations structure . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1968, 13, 65-105 .
TUSHMAN, M. , & ROMANELLI, E.Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. Cummings and B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press , 1985.
66.
ULRICH, D. , & McKELVEY, B.General organizational classification: An empirical test using the United States and Japanese electronics industries. Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , 1986.
67.
WEBER, M. In T. Parsons (Ed.), The theory of social and economic organization. N.Y.: Oxford University Press , 1947.
68.
WEICK, K.The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley , 1969.
69.
WOODWARD, J.Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London: Tavistock , 1965.
