A "rational integration" model is proposed to explain why organizations, according to Allison (1971), tend to be mutually perceived as "rational actors" exhibiting goal consensus. It is suggested that the perception of rational action is attributable not merely to cognitive error but also to rational behaviors, performed both by elements of the perceived rational actor and by members of other organizations with which it transacts. The discussion addresses practical implications of rational integration, including problems and opportunities, and strategies for overcoming or exploiting them. The discussion also demonstrates how (1) the proposed model may enhance knowledge of organizations, and (2) research may contribute to this knowledge. Finally, by assigning causality to both "objective" social structure and the "subjective" perception of it, the proposed model can benefit social analysis in general by demonstrating an approach that integrates the structural and interpretive schools through a newly-proposed paradigm called "meta-structuralism. "
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADORNO, T. W., FRENKEL-BRUNSWICK, E., LEVINSON, D. J., & SANFORD, R. N.The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper, 1950.
2.
ALDERFER, C. P.Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings. New York: Free Press, 1972.
3.
ALDRICH, H. E.Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
4.
ALLISON, G.Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown, and Co., 1971.
5.
ALLPORT, F. H.Institutional behavior. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 1933.
6.
ASCH, S.Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In M. H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Carnegie, 1951.
7.
BACHRACH, S. B., & LAWLER, E. J.Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
8.
BARNARD, C.The functions of the executive. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1938.
9.
BIERI, J.Cognitive structures in personality. In H. M. Schroder and P. Suedfeld (Eds.), Personality theory and information processing. New York: Ronald, 1971, pp. 178-208.
10.
BLAU, P.The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago. Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1955.
11.
BLAU, P.Formal organizations: Dimensions of analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 1957. 63,
12.
BRAVERMAN, H.Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.
13.
CHAPLIN, J. P.Dictionary of psychology. New York: Dell Publishing Co., 1975.
14.
CLARK, R. D., III.Group-induced shift toward risk: A critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, October 1971.
15.
COHEN, M. D., MARCH, J. G., & OLSEN, J. P.A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972. 17.
16.
CYERT, R. M., & MARCH, J. G.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
17.
DAHL, R.Modern political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
18.
DUBIN, R.Industrial workers' worlds: A study of the "central life interests" of industrial workers. Social Problems, 1956, 3.
19.
DUBIN, R.Theory building in applied areas. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, Illinois: Rand-McNally, 1976.
20.
EMERSON, R. M.Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 1962, 27.
21.
EMERY, F. E., & TRIST, E. L.The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 1965, 18.
22.
FRENCH, J. R. P., Jr., & RAVEN, B.The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.
23.
FREUD, S.The future of an illusion. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1926.
24.
GALBRAITH, J. K.American capitalism. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton-Mifflin, 1952.
25.
GOFFMAN, E.The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday, 1959.
26.
GOFFMAN, E.Asylums. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1961.
27.
GRUDER, C. L.Determinants of social comparison choices. Journal of Social Experimental Psychology, 1971, 7.
28.
HICKSON, D. J., HININGS, C. R., LEE, C. A., SCHNECK, R. E., & PENNINGS, J. M.A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971. 16.
29.
HIRSCHMANN, A. O.Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1970.
30.
HOFFMAN, L. R.Homogeneity of member personality and its effect on group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, June 1959, 27-33.
LATANE, B.Studies in social comparison introduction and overview. Journal of Social Experimental Psychology, 1977.
33.
LOCKE, E. A.Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1968, 3, 157-189.
34.
LODAHL, J., & GORDON, G.Funding the sciences in university departments. Educational Record, 1973.
35.
MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H.Organizations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
36.
MARX, K.Karl Marx: Early writings (translated and edited by T. B. Bottomore). London, England: L. A. Watts, 1963.
37.
McGUIRE, W. J.Order of presentation as a factor in "conditioning" persuasiveness. In C. I. Hovland et al. (Eds.), The order of presentation in persuasion. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1957.
38.
MECHANIC, D.Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1962, 7, 349-362.
39.
MERTON, R. K.Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1956.
40.
MILES, R. H.Macro-organizational behavior. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman, and Co., 1980.
41.
MINTZBERG, H.Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1983.
42.
MITROFF, I. I.Stakeholders of the organizational mind. San Francisco, California: Jossey Bass, 1984.
43.
MURPHY, G.Social motivation. In G. Lindsey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1954.
44.
MURRAY, H. A.Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
45.
NARAYANAN, V. K., & FAHEY, L.The micropolitics of strategy-formulation. Academy of Management Review, 1982, 7(1).
46.
PERROW, C.Complex organizations: A critical essay. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman, and Co., 1972.
47.
PETTIGREW, A. M.Information control as a power resource. Sociology, 1972.
48.
PFEFFER, J.Power in organizations. Marshfield, Massachusetts: Pitman, 1981.
49.
RECK-MALLECZEWEN, F. P.Diary of a man in despair. New York: MacMillan, 1970.
50.
SALANCIK, G., & PFEFFER, J.A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23.
51.
SCHACTER, S.The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, California: Stanford, 1959.
52.
SCOTT, W. R.Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
53.
SCOTT, W. R., & MITCHELL, T. R.Organization theory. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, 1972, p. 147-147.
54.
SELIGMAN, B. B.Most notorious victory: Man in an age of automation. New York: Free Press, 1966.
55.
THOMPSON, J.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
56.
TUSHMAN, M.A political approach to organizations: A review and rationale. Academy of Management Review, 1977.
57.
UDY, S. H.Bureaucracy and rationality in Weber's organization theory: An empirical study. American Sociological Review, 1959, 4, 791-795.
58.
WAMSLEY, G. L., & ZALD, M. N.The political economy of public organizations. Lexington, Massachusetts: Health, 1973.
59.
WATZLAWICK, P., BAVELAS, J., & JACKSON, D.Pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton, 1967.
60.
WEBER, M.The theory of social and economic organizations. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1947.
61.
WEICK, K.The socialpsychology of organizing. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. 1969.
62.
WILDAVSKY, A.Budgeting as a political process. In D. Sills (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences. New York: Crowell, Collier, and MacMillan, 1968.
