Past research has demonstrated that executives discussing the performance of their organizations tend to take credit for good performance and lay blame on the environment for poor performance. Two experiments were conducted to test the effects of this pattern of self-serving attributions on student subjects' confidence in management and their allocation of financial resources. Results of both experiments showed that executives' communications taking credit for good performance reduce recipients' confidence in management and resource commitments. Implications of these results for management practice and for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BATEMAN, T.The escalation of commitment in sequential decision-making. Decision Sciences, 1986, 17, 33-49.
2.
BATEMAN, T., & SCHWENK, C.Bias in investor decision-making: The case of John DeLorean. Mid-American Journal of Business, 1986, 1, 5-11.
3.
BETTMAN, J., and WEITZ, B.Attributions in the boardroom. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 165-183.
4.
BOWMAN, E.Strategy and the weather. Sloan Management Review, 1976, 17, 49-62.
5.
BOWMAN, E.Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk. Interfaces, 1984, 14, 61-71.
6.
BROCKNER, J., & RUBIN, J.Entrapment in escalating conflicts. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
7.
DUHAIME, I., & SCHWENK, C.Conjectures on cognitive simplification in acquisition and divestment decision-making. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10, 287-295.
8.
EAGLY, A., CHAIKEN, S., & WOOD, W.An attribution analysis of persuasion. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. Kidd (Eds.), New Directions in attribution research (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1981, pp. 37-62.
9.
FOX, F. V., & STAW, B. M.The trapped administrator: Effects of job security and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 449-471.
10.
HALL, A.Great planning disasters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
11.
HUFF, A., & SCHWENK, C.Bias and sensemaking in good times and bad. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Strategic Management Society, Barcelona, 1985.
12.
SALANCIK, G., & MEINDL, J.Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29, 238-254.
13.
SCHWENK, C.Information, cognitive bias, and commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11, 293-310.
14.
STAW, B. M.Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1076, 16, 27-44.
15.
STAW, B.The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6, 577-587.
16.
STAW, B. M., AND FOX, F. V.Escalation: The determinants of commitment to a course of action. Human Relations, 1977, 30, 431-450.
17.
STAW, B. M., & ROSS, J.Commitment to a policy decision: A multitheoretical perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 40-64.
