Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Two studies used questionnaires to assess how subjects thought they would feel about themselves in a variety of competitive and noncompetitive situations. Self-evaluations were on semantic differential items, which revealed two dimensions, "instrumental" and "expressive. " In Study 1, losing affected self-evaluations negatively on both dimensions, and winning negatively on the expressive dimension compared to some noncompetitive settings. In Study 2, the factors of success/failure and group/individual were separated from the competitive or cooperative nature of the task; gender and general self-evaluation were also controlled. Differences between winning and losing were similar to differences between succeeding and failing in noncompetitive settings, although competition had a positive effect on instrumental self-esteem. A group setting affected both dimensions positively. A few gender differences appeared.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ARONSON, E. & OSHEROW, N. Cooperation, prosocial behavior, and academic performance. In L. Bickman (Eds.), Applied Social Psychology Annual (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980, pp. 163-195.

BERGER, J. , ROSENHOLTZ, S. J. , & ZELDITCH, M., Jr. Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 1980, 6, 479-508.

DEUTSCH, M. The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.

DOVIDIO, J. F. , HELTMAN, K. , BROWN, C. E. ELLYSON, S. L. , & KEATING, C. F. Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 55, 580-587.

EAGLY, A. H. Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 1983, 38, 971-981.

FRANKS, D. D. , & MAROLLA, J. Efficacious action and social approval as interacting dimensions. Sociometry, 1976, 39, 324-341.

GECAS, V. The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 1982, 8, 1-33.

GORDON, C. Self-conceptions: Configurations of content. In C. Gordon and K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction. New York: Wiley, 1968, pp. 115-136.

MEEKER, B. F. , & WEITZEL-O'NEILL, P. A. Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in taskoriented groups. American Sociological Review, 1977, 42, 91-105.

10.

RIDGEWAY, C. L. Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 1982, 47, 76-88.

11.

ROSENBERG, M. Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books, 1979.

12.

ROSENBERG, M. The self-concept: Social product and social force. In M. Rosenberg and R. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives. New York: Basic Books, 1981, pp. 593-624.

13.

ROBIN, J. Z. , & BROWN, B. R. The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

14.

SPENCE, J. T. , DEAUX, K. , & HELMREICH, R. L. Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House, 1985, pp. 149-178.

15.

TERHUNE, K. W. Effects of personality in cooperation and conflict. In P. Swingle (Eds.), The structure of conflict. New York: Academic Press, 1970.

16.

WELLS, L. E. , & MARWELL, G. Self-esteem: Its conceptualization and measurement. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1976.

17.

WOOD, W. , & KARTEN, S. J. Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50, 341-347.

18.

WYLIE, R. C. The self-concept (Vol. 2). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979.

Cooperation,Competition,and Self-Esteem: Aspects of Winning and Losing

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References