Recently, Breaugh (1985) developed an instrument that measures three facets, i.e., method, scheduling, and criteria, of work autonomy. This paper presents the results of several analyses designed to evaluate the construct validity of these work autonomy scales. One set of analyses involved the use of confirmatory factor analysis to assess the underlying factor structure of the three work autonomy facet measures. Both indices for assessing the fit of a theoretical model confirmed that a three-facet autonomy model clearly fits the sample data. A second set of analyses involved subgroup comparisons. As predicted, unionized employees reported less autonomy in all three areas than non-union workers. Also as hypothesized, individuals in supervisory positions reported having more autonomy than those not in supervisory positions. The paper also reports a number of additional analyses relevant to the construct validity of the work autonomy scales. When the results reported in this paper are taken in combination with those reported in Breaugh (1985) and Breaugh and Becker (1987), there is substantial evidence supporting both the construct validity and the importance of the work autonomy facet scales.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALDAG, R. J., BARR, S. H., & BRIEF, A. P.The measurement of perceived task characteristics. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90, 415-431.
2.
BAILYN, L.Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab. Human Resource Management, 1985, 24, 129-146.
3.
BENTLER, P. M., & BONETT, D. G.Significance tests and goodness of fit in analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88, 588-606.
4.
BREAUGH, J. A.The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 1985, 38, 551-570.
5.
BREAUGH, J. A., & BECKER, A. S.Further examination of the work autonomy scales: Three studies. Human Relations, 1987, 40, 381-400.
6.
BRECKLER, S. J.Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 47, 1191-1205.
7.
CHUNG, K. H.Motivational theories and practices. Columbus, Ohio: Grid Publishing, 1977.
8.
COOK, J. D., HEPWORTH, S. J., WALL, T. D., & WARR, P. B.The experience of work. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
9.
CUMMINGS, T. G., & MOLLOY, E. S.Improving productivity and the quality of work life. New York: Praeger, 1977.
10.
DeCOTIIS, T. A., & KOYS, D. J.The identification and measurement of the dimensions of organizational climate. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1980, 171-175.
11.
FAHR, J., & SCOTT, W. E.The experimental effects of "autonomy" on performance and self-reports of satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983, 31, 203-222.
12.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.The development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159-170.
13.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 250-279.
14.
HARVEY, R. J., BILLINGS, R. S., & NILAN, K. J.Confirmatory factor analysis of the job diagnostic survey: Good news and bad news. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70, 461-468.
15.
HICKSON, D. J.A convergence in organizational theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1966, 11, 224-237.
16.
HOLLEY, W. H., FEILD, H. S., & CROWLEY, J. C.Negotiating quality of worklife, productivity, and traditional issues: Union members preferred roles of their union. Personnel Psychology, 1981, 34, 309-328.
17.
IDASAK, J. R., & DRASGOW, F.A revision of the job diagnostic survey: Elimination of measurement artifacts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987,, 72, 69-74.
18.
JORESKOG, K. G., & SORBOM, D.LISREL VI. Mooresville, Indiana: Scientific Software, 1984.
19.
KARASEK, R. A.Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 285-308.
20.
KIGGUNDU, M. N.Task interdependence and the theory of job design. Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6, 494-503.
21.
KIGGUNDU, M. N.Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983, 31, 145-172.
22.
KOCHAN, T. A.Collective bargaining and organizational behavior research. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1980, pp. 129-176.
23.
LANGER, E. J.The psychology of control. Beverly Hills: California: Sage Publications, 1983.
24.
LOCKE, E.The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.
25.
LOHER, B. T., NOE, R. A., MOELLER, N. L., & FITZGERALD, M. P.A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70, 280-289.
26.
LONG, J. S.Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1983.
27.
MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
28.
MORTIMER, J. T. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1985.
29.
NICHOLSON, N. A.A theory of work role transitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29, 172-191.
30.
PORTER, L. W., LAWLER, E. E., & HACKMAN, J. R.Behavior in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975.
31.
RIZZO, J. R., HOUSE, R. J., & LIRTZMAN, S. I.Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1970, 15, 150-163.
32.
ROBERTS, K. H., & GLICK, W.The job characteristics approach to task design: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 193-217.
33.
RUH, R. A., WHITE, J. K., & WOOD, R. R.Job Involvement, values personal background, participation in decision-making, and job attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 300-312.
34.
SAYLES, L. R.Leadership. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.
35.
SCHEIN, E. H.Organizational behavior at various system levels. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1987, pp. 155-171.
36.
SCHNAKE, M. E.An empirical assessment of the effects of affective response in the measurement of organizational climate. Personnel Psychology, 1983, 36, 791-807.
37.
SCHWAB, D. P.Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2). 1980, pp. 3-43.
38.
SIMS, H. P., SZILAGYI, A., & KELLER, R. T. (1976). The measurement of job characterisics. Academy of Management Journal, 1976, 19, 196-213.
39.
SPECTOR, P. E.Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 1986, 39, 1005-1016.
40.
STONE, E. F., & GEUTAL, H. G.An empirical derivation of the dimensions along which characteristics of jobs are perceived. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28, 376-396.
41.
TURNER, A. N., & LAWRENCE, P. R.Industrial jobs and the worker. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1965.
42.
VERMA, A., & KOCHAN, T. A.The growth and nature of the nonunion sector within a firm. In T. A. Kochan (Ed.), Challenges and choices facing American labor. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1985, pp. 89-117.
43.
WERSSOWETZ, R. O., & BEER, M.Human resources at Hewlett-Packard. Harvard Business School Case, 1982, 9, 482-125.
44.
YUKL, G. A.Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1981.
