Recent reviews of occupational stress research constantly emphasizes four important themes. These include the need to clarify what we mean by stress since how we define it influences how we research it and thus how we explain our results, the need to reconsider how we measure stressors, the need to explicity recognize the role of coping by developing measures of coping strategies, and the need to consider the role of alternative methodologies in investigating the stress process. Qualitative and quantitative methodologies are used to explore some of these issues. The results point to the value of using qualitative measures to assess the validity of current research practices. A number of issues emerge. When measuring work stressors, more attention should be given to such facets as intensity, frequency, and the meaning individuals attribute to events. Coping also influences individual meaning and future research should explore the nature of direct action and palliative strategies and more thoroughly investigate the appraisal process and its role in shaping stressful events.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BAILEY, J. M., & BHAGAT, R. S.Meaning and measurement of stressors in the work environment: An evaluation. In S. V. Kasl and C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Stress and health: Issues in research methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
2.
BEEHR, T. A.Stress coping research: Methodological issue. In A. S. Sethi and R. S. Schuler (Eds.), Handbook of organisational stress coping strategies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1984.
3.
BHAGAT, R. S., & BEEHR, T. A.An evaluation summary and recommendations for future research. In T. A. Beehr and R. S. Bhagat (Eds.), Human stress and cognition in organisations: An integrated perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.
4.
BRIEF, A. P., & ATIEH, J. M.Study job stress: Are we making mountains out of molehills?Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1987, 8, 115-126.
5.
BURKE, R. J.Are you fed up with work? How can job tensions be reduced?Personnel Administration, 1972, 34, 27-31.
6.
BURKE, R. J., & BELCOURT, M. L.Managerial role stress and coping responses. Journal of Business Administration, 1974, 5, 55-68.
7.
COHEN, F.Measurement of coping. In S. V. Kasl and C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Stress and health: Issues in research methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
8.
COX, T.The nature and measurement of stress. Ergonomics, 1985, 28, 1155-1163.
9.
COX, T.Stress, coping and problem solving. Work and Stress, 1987, 1, 5-14.
10.
CRUMP, J. H., COOPER, C. L., & SMITH, M.Investigating occupational stress: A methodological approach. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1980, 1, 191-204.
11.
DEWE, P. J.Identifying the causes of nurses' stress: A survey of New Zealand nurses. Work and Stress, 1987, 1, 15-24. (a)
12.
DEWE, P. J.New Zealand ministers of religion: Identifying sources of stress and coping strategies. Work and Stress, 1987, 1, (4), 351-363. (b)
13.
DEWE, P. J., & GUEST, D. E.Methods of coping with stress at work: A conceptual analysis and empirical study of measurment issues. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 1989. (In press).
14.
DOUGHERTY, T. W., & PRITCHARD, R. D.The measurement of role variables: Exploratory examination of a new approach. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1985, 35, 141-155.
15.
FINEMAN, S., & PAYNE, R.Role stress -A methodological trap. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1981, 2, 51-64.
16.
FIRTH, J.Personal meanings of occupational stress: Cases from the clinic. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1985, 58, 139-148.
17.
FLEMING, R., BAUM, A., & SINGER, J. E.Toward and intergrative approach to the study of stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 939-949.
18.
FOLKMAN, S.An approach to the measurement of coping. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1982, 3, 95-107.
19.
FOLKMAN, S.Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 839-852.
20.
FRENCH, J. R. P., RODGER, W., & COBB, S.Adjustment as person-environments fit. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, and J. E. Adams, (Eds.), Coping and adaptation. New York, Basic Books, 1974.
21.
GLOWINKOWSKI, S. P., & COOPER, C. L.Current issues in organisational stress research. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1985, 38, 212-216.
22.
HANDY, J. A.Considering organisations in organisational stress research: A rejoiner to Glowinkowski and Cooper and to Duckworth. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1986, 39, 205-210.
23.
HOLROYD, K. A., & LAZARUS, R. S.Stress, coping, and somatic adaptation. In L. Goldberger, and S. Breznitz, S. (Eds.), Handbook of stess: Theoretical and clinical aspects. New York: Free Press, 1982.
24.
JACKSON, S. E., & SCHULER, R. S.A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1985, 36, 16-78.
25.
JICK, T. D.Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Trangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 802-811.
26.
KANNER, A. D., KAFRY, D., & Pines, A.Conspicuous in its absence: The lack of positive conditions as a source of stress. Journal of Human Stress, 1978, 4, 33-38.
27.
KARASEK, R. A.Job demands, job decisions latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 285-308.
28.
KASL, S. V.Methodologies in stress and health: Past difficulties, present dilemmas, future direction. In S. V. Kasl and C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Stress and Health: Issues in Research Methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
29.
LATACK, J. C.Coping with job stress: Measures and future direction for scale development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71, 377-385.
30.
LAZARUS, R. S.A cognitively oriented psychologist looks at biofeedback. American Psychologist1975, 30, 553-561.
31.
LAZARUS, R. S., & LAUNIER, R.Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In L.A., Pervin, M. Lewis, (Eds.), Perspectives in interactionalpsychology. New York: Plenum, 1978.
32.
LAZARUS, R. S., & FOLKMAN, S.Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Spinger1984.
33.
MOREY, N. C., & LUTHANS, F.An emic perspective and ethnoscience methods for organisational research. The Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 27-36.
34.
MORGAN, G., & SMIRCICH, L.The case of qualitative reseach. The Academy of Management Review, 1980, 5, 491-500.
35.
NEWTON T. J., & KEENAN, A.Coping with work-related stress. Human Relations, 1985, 38, 107-126.
36.
NEWTON, T. J. & KEENAN, A.Role stress re-examined: An investigation of role stress predictors. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 1987, 40, 346-368.
37.
NORUSIS, M. J.Introductory statistics guide SPSSX. New York: McGrawHill Book Company, 1983.
38.
PARASURAMAN, S., & CLEEK, M. A.Coping behaviours and managers' affective reactions to role stressors. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 1984, 24, 179-183.
39.
PARKER, D. F., & DECOTIIS, T. A.Organisational determinants of job stress. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1983, 32, 160-177.
40.
PARKES, K. R.Occupational stress among student nurses: A natural experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67, 784-796.
41.
PAYNE, R. A. Demands, supports, constraints and psychological health. Unpublished paper, MRC-Social and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, Sheffield University, 1979.
42.
PAYNE, R. A., JICK, T. D., & BURKE, R. J.Wither stress research?: An agenda for the 1980's. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1982, 3, 131-145.
43.
PEARCE, J. L.Bringing some clarity to role ambiguity research. The Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6, 665-674.
44.
PEARLIN, L. I., & SCHOOLER, C.The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 1978, 19, 2-21.
45.
RIZZO, J. R., HOUSE, R. J., & LIRTZMAN, S. I.Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1970, 15, 150-163.
46.
SCHULER, R. S.An integrative transactional process model of stress in organisations. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1982, 3, 5-20.
47.
SCHULER, R. S.Organisational stress and coping: A model and overview. In A. S. Sethi, and R. S. Schuler, (Eds.), Handbook of organisational stress coping strategies, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1984.
48.
SCHULER, R. S.Integrative transactional process model of coping with stress in organisations. In T. AW. Beehr, and R. S. Bhagat (Eds.), New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.
49.
SETHI, A. S., & SCHULER, R. S.Organisational stress coping: Research issues and future directions. In A. S. Sethi, and R. S. Schuler (Eds.), Handbook of organisational stress coping strategiesCambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1984.
50.
SHAW, J. B., & RISKIND, J. H.Predicting job stress using data from the position analysis questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983, 68, 253-261.
51.
SHIROM, A.What is organisational stress? A facet analytic conception. Journal of Occupation Behaviour1982, 3, 21-38.
52.
TRACY, L., & JOHNSON, T. W.What do the role conflict and role ambiguity scales measures?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 464-469.
53.
VAN MAANEN, J.Reclaiming qualitative methods for organisational research: A preface. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 520-526.
54.
VAN SELL, M.BRIEF, A. P., & SCHULER, R. S.Role conflict and role ambiguity: Integration of the literature and direction for future research. Human Relations, 1981, 34, 43-71.
55.
VINGERHOETS, A. J. J. M., & MARCELISSEN, F. H. G.Stress research: Its present status and issues for future developments. Social Science and Medicine, 1988, 26, 279-291.
