Although many organization researchers regard group cohesiveness as a key variable in their theorizing, the presumed importance of the cohesiveness construct has not always been accompanied by a corresponding emphasis on theoretical and empirical advances. This paper focuses primarily on the difficulties associated with the measurement of group cohesiveness, particularly as they pertain to the contentious relationship between group cohesiveness and productivity. Little is known for certain about this relationship in spite of four decades of investigation. One possible explanation for the inconclusive findings which characterize this literature is that no two studies reviewed here operationalized cohesiveness in exactly the same way. An emphasis on consistent and uniform measurement, and on the use of multiple measures of cohesiveness, should greatly improve the quality of future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AUSTIN, J. T. , & BOBKO, P.Goal-setting theory: Unexplored areas and future research needs . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1985, 58, 289-308 .
2.
BACK, K. W.Influence through social communication . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951, 46, 9-23 .
3.
BAKEMAN, R. , & HELMREICH, R.Cohesiveness and performance: Covariation and causality in an undersea environment . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1975, 11, 478-489 .
4.
BERKOWITZ, L.Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity . Human Relations, 1954, 7, 509-519 .
5.
BINNING, J. F. , & LORD, R. G.Boundary conditions for performance cue effects on group process ratingsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980, 26, 115-130 .
6.
CARRON, A. V.Cohesiveness in sport groups: Implications and considerations . Journal of Sport Psychology, 1982, 4, 123-138 .
7.
COHEN, D. , WHITMYRE, J. W. , & FUNK, W. H.Effect of group cohesiveness and training upon creative thinking . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1960, 44, 319-322 .
8.
COMREY, A. L. , PFIFFNER, J. M. , & BEEM, H. P.Factors influencing organizational effectiveness: The U.S. forest survey . Personnel Psychology, 1952, 5, 307-328 .
9.
DEEP, S. D. , BASS, B. M. , & VAUGHAN, J. A.Some effects on business gaming of previous quasi-T group affiliations . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967, 51, 426-431 .
10.
DeNISI, A. S. , & PRITCHARD, R. D.Implicit theories of performance as artifacts in survey research: A replication and extension . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 21, 358-366 .
11.
DEUTSCH, M.An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and competition upon group processes . Human Relations, 1949, 2, 199-231 .
12.
DOBBINS, G. H. , & ZACCARO, S. J.The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction . Group and Organization Studies, 1986, 11, 203-219 .
13.
DORFMAN, P. W. , & STEPHAN, W. G.The effects of group performance on cognitions, satisfaction, and behavior: A process model . Journal of Management, 1984, 10, 173-192 .
14.
DOWNEY, H. K. , CHACKO, T. I. , & McELROY, J. C.Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A constructive, quasi-longitudinal replication of the Staw (1975) study . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 24, 287-299 .
15.
EVANS, M. G.Organizational behavior: The central role of motivation . Journal of Management, 1986, 12, 203-222 .
16.
FESTINGER, L.Informal social communication . Psychological Review, 1950, 57, 271-282 .
17.
FESTINGER, L. , SCHACHTER, S. , & BACK, K.Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press , 1950.
18.
FIEDLER, F. E.Assumed similarity measures as predictors of team effectiveness . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1954, 49, 381-388 .
19.
FRENCH, J. R. P., Jr.The disruption and cohesion of groups . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1941, 36, 361-377 .
20.
GEORGOPOULOS, B. S. , MAHONEY, G. M. , & JONES, N. W., Jr.A path-goal approach to productivity . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1957, 41, 345-353 .
21.
GIOIA, D. A.Symbols, scripts, and sensemaking: Creating meaning in the organizational experience. In H. P. Sims, Jr. and D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 1986, pp. 49-74.
22.
GLADSTEIN, D. L.Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29, 499-517 .
23.
GOODACRE, D. M., III . The use of a sociometric test as a predictor of combat unit effectiveness . Sociometry, 1951, 14, 148-152 .
24.
GOODMAN, P. S. , RAVLIN, E. , & SCHMINKE, M.Understanding groups in organizations. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press , 1987, pp. 121-173.
25.
GRACE, H. A.Conformance and performance . Journal of Social Psychology, 1954, 40, 333-335 .
26.
GRANOVETTER, M. S.The strength of weak ties . American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 1360-1380 .
27.
GROSS, N. , & MARTIN, W. E.On group cohesiveness . American Journal of Sociology, 1952, 52, 546-554 .
28.
GROSS, N. , MARTIN, W. E. , & DARLEY, J. G.Studies of group behavior: Leadership structures in small organized groups . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1953, 48, 429-432 .
29.
HEMPHILL, J. K. , & SECHREST, L. B.A comparison of three criteria of aircrew effectiveness in combat over Korea . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1952, 36, 323-327 .
30.
HOOGSTRATEN, J. , & VOORST, H. C. M.Group cohesion, task performance, and the experimenter expectancy effect . Human Relations, 1978, 31, 939-956 .
31.
HORSFALL, A. B. , & ARENSBERG, C. M.Teamwork and productivity in a shoe factory . Human Organization, 1949, 8, 13-25 .
32.
HOUSE, R. J.A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 321-338 .
33.
HOUSE, R. J. , & BAETZ, M. L.Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. In L. L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 1). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press , 1979, pp. 341-432.
34.
KATZ, D. , MACCOBY, N. , & MORSE, N. C.Productivity, supervision, and morale in an office situation. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , 1950.
35.
KATZ, D. , MACCOBY, N. , GURIN, G. , & FLOOR, L. G.Productivity, supervision, and morale among railroad workers. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , 1951.
36.
KERR, S. , & JERMIER, J. M.Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 22, 375-403 .
37.
KOCH, J. R.Effects of goal specificity and performance feedback to work groups on peer leadership, performance, and attitudes . Human Relations, 1979, 32, 819-840 .
38.
LIBO, L. M.Measuring group cohesiveness. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , 1953.
39.
LIKERT, R.New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company , 1961.
40.
LOTT, A. J. , & LOTT, B. E.Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables . Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 259-309 .
41.
MIESING, P. , PREBLE, J. F.Group processes and performance in a complex business simulation . Small Group Behavior, 1985, 16, 325-338 .
42.
MIKALACHKI, A.Group cohesion reconsidered: A study of blue collar work groups. London, Ontario: School of Business Administration, University of Western Ontario , 1969.
43.
MORENO, J. L. , & JENNINGS, H. H.Statistics of social configurations . Sociometry, 1937, 1, 342-374 .
44.
MUDRACK, P. E.Defining group cohesiveness: A legacy of confusion . Small Group Behavior, 1989, 20, 37-49 .
45.
NARAYANAN, V. K. , & NATH, R.The influence of group cohesiveness on some changes induced by flexitime: A quasi-experiment . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1984, 20, 265-276 .
46.
NORFLEET, B.Interpersonal relations and group productivity . Journal of Social Issues, 1948, 4, 66-69 .
47.
NORRIS, D. R. , & NIEBUHR, R. E.Group variables and gaming success . Simulation and Games, 1980, 11, 301-312 .
48.
O'REILLY, C. A., III , & ROBERTS, K. H.Task group structure, communication, and effectiveness in three organizations . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 674-681
49.
OWEN, W. F.Metaphor analysis of cohesiveness in small discussion groups . Small Group Behavior, 1985, 16, 415-424 .
50.
PELZ, D. C. , & ANDREWS, F. M.Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. New York: John Wiley and Sons , 1966.
51.
PEPITONE, A. , & KLEINER, R.The effects of threat and frustration on group cohesiveness . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 54, 192-199 .
52.
PODSAKOFF, P. M. , & TODOR, W. D.Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and group processes and productivity . Journal of Management, 1985, 11, 55-73 .
53.
ROBY, T. B.The influence of subgroup relationships on the performance of group and subgroup tasks . American Psychologist, 1952, 7, 313-314 .
54.
SCHACHTER, S. , ELLERTSON, N. , McBRIDE, D. , & GREGORY, D.An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity . Human Relations, 1951, 4, 229-238 .
55.
SEASHORE, S. E.Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research , 1954.
56.
SHAW, M. E. , & SHAW, L. M.Some effects of sociometric grouping upon learning in a second grade classroom . Journal of Social Psychology, 1962, 57, 453-458 .
57.
SHERIDAN, J. E.A catastrophe model of employee withdrawal leading to low job performance, high absenteeism, and job turnover during the first year of employment . Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28, 88-109 .
58.
STAW, B. M.Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13, 414-432 .
59.
STOGDILL, R. M.Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature . Journal of Psychology, 1948, 25, 35-71 .
60.
STOGDILL, R. M.Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1972, 8, 26-53 .
61.
STOGDILL, R. M.Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: The Free Press , 1974.
62.
STRUPP, H. H. , & Hausman, H. J.Some correlates of group productivity . American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 443-444 .
63.
TANNENBAUM, R. , WESCHLER, I. R. , & MASSARIK, F.Leadership and organization: A behavioral science approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company , 1981.
64.
TERBORG, J. R. , CASTORE, C. , & DeNINNO, J. A.A longitudinal field investigation of the impact of group composition on group performance and cohesion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 782-790 .
65.
THOMAS, E. J.Effects of facilitative role interdependence on group functioningHuman Relations, 1957, 10, 347-366 .
66.
THOMAS, J. , & GRIFFIN, R.The social information processing model of task design: A review of the literature . Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8, 672-682 .
67.
TORRANCE, E. P.Perception of group functioning as a predictor of group performance . Journal of Social Psychology, 1955, 42, 271-282 .
68.
TURNER, J. C. , HOGG, M. A. , TURNER, P. J. , & SMITH, P. M.Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1984, 23, 97-111 .
69.
TZINER, A. , & VARDI, Y.Effects of command style and group cohesiveness on the performance effectiveness of self-selected tank crews . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67, 769-775 .
70.
WEICK, K. E.Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 1-19 .
71.
ZANDER, A.The psychology of group processes . Annual Review of Psychology, 1979, 30, 417-451 .
