Organizational research entails encounters with two groups of people who are usually labeled "nonparticipants": (1) those who are never asked to participate, but whom the investigator encounters during the data gathering, and (2) those selected to participate, but who cannot or will not do so. This paper demonstrates the value of these data for field research, particularly for studies that rely on questionnaires, interviews, and structured observations. The sequence of events typically associated with recruiting respondents and informants is proposed to create five key junctures at which research can be designed to gather such data. Ethical issues are raised concerning the use of information from nonparticipants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALDERFER, C. P.Organizational diagnosis from initial client reactions to a researcher. Human Organization, 1968, 27, 260-265.
2.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human subjects. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1973.
3.
ARBER, S., & SAWYER, L.The role of the receptionist in general practice. A "dragon behind the desk?"Social Science and Medicine, 1985, 20, 911-921.
4.
BECKER, H. S.Problems in the publication of field studies. In A. Vidich, J. Bensman, and M. Stein (Eds.), Reflections on community studies. New York: Wiley. 1964.
5.
BERG, D. N.Failure at entry. In P. H. Mirvis and D. N. Berg (Eds.), Failures in organization development and change. New York: Wiley, 1977.
6.
BERG, D. N., & SMITH, K. K.Exploring clinical methods for social research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1985.
7.
EKMAN, P., & OSTER, H.Facial expression of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 1977, 30, 527-554.
8.
EKMAN, P., FRIESEN, W. V., & ELLSWORTH, P.Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and a review of findings. New York: Pergamon, 1972.
9.
EKMAN, P., FRIESEN, W. V., & ANCOLI, S.Facial signs of emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 1125-1134.
10.
GLASER, B., & STRAUSS, A.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
11.
GROVES, R., & KANN, R. L.Surveys by telephone: A national comparison with personal interviews. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
12.
HARRIS, S. G., & SUTTON, R. I.Functions of parting ceremonies in dying organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29, 5-30.
13.
HEBERLEIN, T. A., & BAUMGARTNER, R.Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 447-462.
14.
KAHN, R. L., & MANN, F. C.Developing research partnerships. Journal of Social Issues, 1952, 8, 4-10.
15.
KISH, L.Survey sampling. New York: Wiley, 1965.
16.
LUEPTOW, L., MUELLER, S. A., HAMMES, R. R. & MASTER, L. S.The impact of informed consent regulations on response rate and response bias. In D. F. Alwin (Ed.), Survey design and anlaysis: Current issues. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1978.
17.
MILES, M. B., & HUBERMAN, A. M.Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1984.
18.
MIRVIS, P. H. & SEASHORE, S. E.Being ethical in organizational research. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 766-780.
19.
PENNEBAKER, J. W., & NEWSTON, D.Observation of a unique event: The psychological impact of the Mount Saint Helens Volcano. In H. R. Reis (Ed.), Naturalists approaches to studying social interaction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
20.
SALANCIK, G. R.Field stimulations for organizational behavior research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 638-649.
21.
SCHATZMAN, L., & STRAUSS, A. L.Field research: Strategies for a natural sociology. Englewood, Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
22.
STAW, B. M., SANDELANDS, L. E., & DUTTON, J. E.Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavioral: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26, 501-524.
23.
SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER. Interviewer's manual (Rev. ed.). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, 1976.
24.
SUTTON, R. I. Organizational death. Doctoral dissertation, the University of Michigan, Department of Psychology, 1984.
25.
SUTTON, R. I.The process of organizational death: Struggling and disbanding. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, 542-569.
26.
SUTTON, R. I., & CALLAHAN, A. L.The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Academy of Management Journal, 1987, 30, 405-436.
27.
SUTTON, R. I., & SCHURMAN, S. J.On studying emotionally hot topics: Lessons from an investigation of organizational death. In D. N. Berg and K. Smith (Eds.), Clinical demands of research methods. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1985.
28.
TANNENBAUM, A. S.Control and effectiveness in a voluntary organization. American Journal of Sociology, 1961, 67, 33-44.
29.
THOMPSON, J. D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
30.
VAN MAANEN, J.Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organization, 1973, 32, 407-417.
31.
VAN MAANEN, J.Police socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 207-228.
32.
VAN MAANEN, J.Fieldwork on the beat. In J. Van Maanen, J. M. Dabbs, Jr., and R. R. Faulkner (Eds.), Varieties of qualitative research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage. 1982.
33.
VAN MAANEN, J.On the ethics of field work. In R. B. Smith (Ed.), An introduction to social research: A handbook of social science methods. Boston: Ballinger. 1983.
34.
WEBB, E. J., CAMPBELL, D. T., SCHWARTZ, D. S., SECHREST, L., & GROVE, J. B.Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.
35.
WHETTEN, D. A.Organizational decline: Sources, responses, and effects. In J. R. Kimberly & R. H. Miles (Eds.), Organizational life cycles. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
