Bion's group dynamic theory can be divided into a general group dynamic part, a description of the basic assumptions fight/flight, dependency and pairing, and a metapsychological explanation of the basic assumption phenomena. Previous studies with somewhat questionable methodology have found that the basic assumption pairing seems more closely associated with fight/flight than dependency. This study replicates these findings. Seventyfive inpatient group therapy sessions were studied in detail by Group Emotionality Rating System and Group Focal Conflict Analysis. The phenomenological part of the study suggests quantitative levels when scattered emotional statements turn into manifest basic assumption. The groups demonstrating the association between pairing andfight/flight contained emotionality beyond these levels, thus indicating that they represented "true" basic assumption groups. Several observations suggest that the capacity for pairing is vitalfor the survival of fight/flight groups which otherwise risk the fate of disintegration. These observations call for new metapsychological explanations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ARMELIUS, B. A.Group personality and group behavior: An expansion of Bion's model. Research report No. 1, Department of Applied Psychology, Umea University, 1980.
2.
ARMELIUS, K., & ARMELIUS, B. A.Group personality, task, and group culture. In M. Pines (Ed.), Bion and group psychotherapy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.
3.
ARMELIUS, B. A., & KATAJA, P.Developing a questionnaire for measuring work-emotionality on wards. Research report, Department of Applied Psychology, Umea University, 1980.
4.
BABAD, E. Y., & AMIR, L.Bennis and Shepard's theory of group development. An empirical examination. Small Group Behavior, 1978, 4, 77-93.
5.
BATTEGAY, R.Three central factors of group psychotherapy: Oedipal complex, rivalry conflict, narcissistic group-self. In R. Wolberg (Ed.), Group Therapy 1976. New York: Stratton International Medical Book Corp.1976.
6.
BION, W. R.Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock Publications, 1961.
7.
COOPER, E. J.The pre-group: The narcissistic phase of group development with the severely disturbed patient. In R. L. Wolberg (Ed.), Group therapy 1978. New York: Stratton Intercontinental, 1978.
8.
DUNPHY, D. C.Phases, roles and myths in self-analytic groups. Journal of Applied Behavvioral Science, 1968, 4, 195-225.
9.
EZRIEL, H.A psycho-analytic approach to group treatment. British Journal of Med. Psychol.1950, 23, 59-74.
10.
FOGELSTAM, H., & KJELLBERG, B.To measure ward atmosphere: Validation of a ques tionnaire. Research report, Department of Applied Psychology, Umed University, 1981.
11.
FOULKES, S. H.Group analytic psychotherapy. London: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1975.
12.
HARTMAN, J. J., & GIBBARD, G. S.A note on fantasy themes in the evolution of group culture. In G. S. Gibbard, J. J. Hartman, and R. D. Mann (Eds.), Analysis of groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1974.
13.
JOHNSON, D. et al. Group psychotherapy with schizophrenic patients: The pairing group. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1986, 36(1), 75-96.
14.
KARTERUD, S.On pairing in groups with schizophrenic patients. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1987, 37(3), 461-463.
15.
KARTERUD, S.The valence theory of Bion and the significance of (DSM-III) diagnoses for inpatient group behavior. Acta Psychiat. Scand.1988, 78, 462-470. (a)
16.
KARTERUD, S.Bion or Kohut: Two paradigms of group dynamics. In B. E. Roth, W. N. Stone, and H. D. Kibel, (Eds.). The difficult patient in group. Group psychotherapy with borderline and narcissistic disorders. Madison: International Universities Press, 1989.
17.
KARTERUD, S.What are the prerequisites and indications of the therapeutic community proper?Acta Psychiat. Scand., 1988, 77, 658-669. (b)
18.
KARTERUD, S.A reliability study of a hermeneutic method: Group focal confict analysis. Group Analysis, 1988, 21(4), 333-346. (c)
19.
KARTERUD, S.The influence of task definition, leadership and therapeutic style on inpatient group cultures. International Journal of Therap. Comm. In press. (a)
20.
KARTERUD, S.A comparative study of six different inpatient groups with respect to their basic assumption functioning. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. In press. (b)
21.
KARTERUD, S., & FOSS, T.Group emotionality rating system. A modification of Thelen's method of assessing emotionality in groups. Small Group Behavior. In press.
22.
KARTERUD, S., & ISLAND, T. K.The mythical group-as-a-whole. One prerequisite for double-bind phenomena within therapeutic communities. Paper presented at Eighth International Congress of Group Psychotherapy, Mexico City, 1984.
23.
KIBEL, H. D.The rationale for the use of group psychotherapy for borderline patients on a short-term unit. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1978, 28, 339-358.
24.
KOHUT, H.The analysis of the self. New York: The International Universities Press, 1971.
25.
KOHUT, H.Creativeness, charisma, group psychology. In H. Kohut (Ed.), The search for the self. New York: International Universities Press, 1978.
26.
KOHUT, H.Self-psychology and the humanities. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1985.
27.
LOFGREN, L.The self in a small group: A comparison of the theories of Bion and Kohut. In P. Stepausky and A. Goldberg (Eds.), Kohut's Legacy. Hillsdale, NY: Analytic Press, 1984.
28.
MALAN, D. H., et al. Group psychotherapy: Long-term follow-up study. Archives Gen. Psychiat., 1976, 33, 1303-1315.
29.
PINES, M.Bion and group psychotherapy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.
30.
PINES, M.Bion: A group analytic appreciation. Group Analysis, 1987, 20(3), 251-262.
31.
RICE, A. K.Learning for leadership. London: Tavistock Publications, 1965.
32.
SLATER, P. E.Microcosm: Structure, psychological and religious evolution in groups. New York: Wiley, 1966.
33.
THELEN, H., et al. Methods for studying work and emotionality in groups. Planograph, University of Chicago,1954.
34.
WHITAKER, D., & LIEBERMAN, M.Methodological issues in the assessment of total-group phenomena in group therapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1962, 12, 312-325.
35.
WHITAKER, D., & LIEBERMAN, M.Psychotherapy through the group process. Chicago: Atherton Press, 1964.
