A qualitative case approach is used to examine the capacity of the potential influence incongruence model of interpersonal conflict to analyze the latent sources of conflict and the resultant conflict processes in three cases of interpersonal conflict in organizations. A discussion of the case study approach and its role in theory construction and confirmation is provided. The three cases analyzed are those described by Walton (1969) in his seminal study of third-party conflict interventions. It is demonstrated that the model provides plausible, theoretically-integrated explanations of the sources of conflict in these three cases and aids understanding of the attitudes and behavior of the parties involved. A feature of the analysis is its integration of psychological and sociological concepts including bases of interpersonal power, the role concept and the process of role definition, and influence of role specialization and differentiation, symbolic aspects of interpersonal conflict, personality factors such as power needs, and dissonance theory. A degree of model clarification and elaboration are undertaken and the implications for conflict resolution and management are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ARONSON, E. A.The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Cognitive theories in social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
2.
BIDDLE, B. J.Role theory: Expectations, identities and behaviors. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
3.
BROWN, D. L.Managing conflict at organizational interfaces. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1983.
4.
ECKSTEIN, H.Case study and theory in political science. In R. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
5.
EMERSON, R. M.Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 31-41.
6.
FESTINGER, C. A.A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, Illinois: Row-Peterson, 1957.
7.
FRENCH, J. R. P., Jr., & RAVEN, B. H.The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Abor, Michigan Institute for Social Research, 1959.
8.
FROST, P. J.Power, politics and influence. In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, and L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication. California: Sage, 1987, pp. 345-357.
9.
GEORGE, A. L., & McKEOWN, T. J.Case studies and theories of organizational decision making. Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, 1985, 2, 21-58.
10.
HARAY, F., NORMAN, R. Z., & CARTWRIGHT, D.Structural models. New York: Wiley, 1965.
11.
HOMANS, G. C.Commentary. In L. Berkowitz and E. Walster, (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press, 1976.
12.
Journal of Management Studies, 1983, 20(3), whole issue.
13.
HOUSE, R. J. Power in organizations: A social-psychological perspective. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto, Faculty of Management Studies, 1984.
14.
KABANOFF, B.The potential influence index as a measure of situational favourability in the contingency model of leadership. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1981, 33, 47-59.
15.
KABANOFF, B.Potential influence structures as sources of interpersonal conflict in groups and organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 36, 113-141.
16.
KIESLER, S.Interpersonal processes in groups and organizations. Arlington Heights, Illinois: AHM, 1980.
17.
LUTHANS, F., ROSENKRANTZ, S. A., & HENNESSEY, H. W.What do successful managers really do? An observation study of managerial activities. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 1985, 21, 255-270.
18.
O'BRIEN, G. E.Groups structure and the measurement of potential leader influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 21, 427-439.
19.
O'BRIEN, G. E., & HARARY, F.Measurement of the interactive effects of leadership style and group structure upon group performance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1977, 29, 59-72.
20.
O'BRIEN, G. E., BIGLAN, A., & PENNA, J.Group structure and the measurement of potential leader influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, 56, 11-18.
21.
O'BRIEN, G. E., & GROSS, W. F.Structural indices for potential participation in groups. Australian Journal of Psychology, 33, 135-148.
22.
OESER, O. A., & HARARY, F.A mathematical model of structural role theory, I. Human Relations, 1962, 15, 89-109.
23.
OESER, O. A., & HARARY, F.A mathematical model for structural role theory, II. Human Relations, 1964, 17, 3-17.
24.
OESER, O. A., & O'BRIEN, G. E.A mathematical model for structural role theory, III: The analysis of group tasks. Human Relations, 1967, 20, 83-97.
25.
PFEFFER, J.Power in organizations. Marshfield, Massachusetts: Pitman, 1981.
26.
PONDY, L. R.Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967, 12, 296-320.
27.
PRICE, K. H., & GARLAND, H.Compliance with a leader's suggestions as a function of perceived leader/member competence and potential reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 329-336.
28.
RAVEN, B. H., & FRENCH, J. R. P., Jr., Legitimate power, coercive power and observability in social relations. Sociometry, 1958, 21, 83-97.
29.
RAVEN, B. H., & KRUGLANSKI, A. W.Conflict and power. In P. Swingle (Ed.), The structure of conflict. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
30.
SAMPSON, E. E.Studies of social congruence. In C. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1969.
31.
SCHNEIDER, B.Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 1985, 36, 573-611.
32.
SCHUTZ, W. C.What makes groups productive?Human Relations, 1955, 8, 429-465.
33.
SCOTT, W. C., & COHEN, R. D.Sociometric indices of group structure. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1978, 30, 41-57.
34.
SCOTT, W. C., & SCOTT, R.Structural properties of groups. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1979, 31, 89-100.
35.
SHAW, M. E.Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behaviour (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
36.
STAW, B. M., SANDELANDS, L. E., & DUTTON, J. E.Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26, 506-524.
37.
SWINGLE, P. G.The management of power. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.
38.
THOMAS, K. W.Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1976.
39.
TURNER, R. M.The role and the person. American Journal of Sociology, 1978, 84, 1-23.
40.
VAN de VLIERT, E.Conflict-prevention and escalation. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. K. Thierry, P. J. Willems, and C. J. de Walff (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 1984.
41.
VAN MAANEN, J.Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research. A preface. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 520-526.
42.
VAN MAANEN, J., DABBS, J. M., & FAULKNER, R. R.Varieties of qualitative research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1982.
43.
WALTON, R. E.Interpersonal peacemaking: Confrontations and third party consultations (1st ed.). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
44.
ZURCHER, L. A.Social roles: Conformity, conflict and creativity. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1983.
