Attention State and Critical Psychological States as Mediators Between Job Dimensions and Job Outcomes

Abstract

Activity-related-attention (ARA), representing the arousal level, is proposed as an intervening variable linking job characteristics to job outcomes. Two initial studies evaluated a new ARA state questionnaire assessing job-related attentional states. Worker responses displayed high internal consistency and were related to job satisfaction as well as to differences between mundane and enjoyable activities. Student responses displayed high test-retest correlations over a 2-week period. The third study compared the relative role of attention/arousal vs. the critical psychological states (CPS) appearing in Hackman and Oldham's (1976) job characteristics model. Questionnaires completed by 119 employees dealt with (1) job characteristics, (2) job outcomes of work satisfaction, effort, and performance, and (3) ARA state, and CPS. Regression analyses indicated that CPS tended to have a stronger mediating role than ARA in the relation between job characteristics and outcomes. However, ARA was found to contribute significantly to the prediction of perceived effort over and above the contribution of CPS. The article discusses the differences between ARA and CPS both in theory and measurement, and displays the potential value of the ARA state in future research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ALDAG, R. J. , BARR, S. H. , & BRIEF, A. P. Measurement of task characteristics. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90, 415-431.

ARNOLD, H. J. , & HOUSE, R. J. Methodological and substantive extensions to the job characteristics model of motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980, 25, 161-183.

BERLYNE, D. E. Arousal and reinforcement. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1967, 15, 1-110.

COOK, J. D. , HEPWORTH, S. J. , WALL, T. D. , & WARR, P. B. The experience of work. London: Academic Press, 1981.

CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.

ENDLER, N. S. , HUNT, J. M. , & ROSENSTEIN, A. J. An S-R inventory of anxiousness. Psychological Monographs, 1962, 76, (17, whole no. 536).

EVANS, M. G. , KIGGUNDU, M. N. , & HOUSE, R. J. A partial test and extension of the job characteristics model of motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 24, 354-381.

HACKMAN, J. R. , & OLDHAM, G. R. Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159-170.

HACKMAN, J. R. , & OLDHAM, G. R. Motivation through the job design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 250-279.

10.

HACKMAN, J. R. , & OLDHAM, G. R. Work redesign. Reading, Massachusetts: AddisonWesley, 1980.

11.

JERISON, H. Vigilance, discrimination, and attention. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts, 1970, pp. 127-147.

12.

KAHNEMAN, D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

13.

MACKWORTH, J. F. Vigilance and attention. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1970.

14.

O'REILLY, C. A. , & CALDWELL, D. F. Informational influence determinant of perceived task characteristics and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 157-165.

15.

ORPEN, C. The effects of job enrichment on employee satisfaction, motivation, involvement, and performance: A field experiment. Human Relations, 1979, 32, 184-217.

16.

ROBERTS, K. H. , & GLICK, W. The job characteristics approach to task design: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 193-217.

17.

SALANCIK, C. , & PFEFFER, J. An examination of need satisfaction model of job attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977, 22, 427-456.

18.

SCHWAB, D. P. , & CUMMINGS L. L. A theoretical analysis of the impact of task scope on employee performance. Academy of Management Review, 1976, 1, 23-35.

19.

SCOTT, W. S. Activation theory and task design. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1966, 1, 3-30.

20.

SMITH, P. C. , KENDALL, L. M. , & HULIN, C. L. The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1969.

21.

WHITE, S. E. , & MITCHELL, T. R. Job enrichment versus social cues: A comparison and competitive test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 1-9.

22.

YERKES, R. M. , & DODSON, J. P. The relation of strength of stimuli to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurological Psychology, 1908, 18, 459-482.