Firm size has been measured by numerous empirical indicators. Research studies concerned with firm size sometimes assume that these indicators are interchangeable for research purposes. However, an analysis of data on companies from 14 industries indicate that assets and employment, the two most common size measures, may be interchangeable only in certain circumstances.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AGARWAL, N. C.Nature of size-structure relationship: Some further evidence. Human Relations, 1979, 32, 441-450. (a)
2.
AGARWAL, N. C.On the interchangeability of size measures. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 404-409. (b)
3.
ANDERSON, T. R., & MARKOV, S.Organizational size and functional complexity: A study of differentiation in hospitals. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 23-28.
4.
BATES, J.Alternative measures of the size of firms. In P. C. Hart (Ed.), Studies in profit, business saving, and investment in the United Kingdom, 1920-1965. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1965.
5.
BLAU, P. M.A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review, 1970, 35, 201-218.
GILMORE, F. F.Formulating strategy in smaller companies. Harvard Business Review, 1971, 49, 71-81.
8.
GOLDMAN, P.Size and differentiation and organizations: A test of a theory. Pacific Sociological Review, 1973, 16, 89-105.
9.
HAAS, E., HALL, R. H., & JOHNSON, N. J.The size of the supportive component in organizations: A multi-organizational analysis. Social Forces, 1963, 42, 9-17.
10.
HALL, M., & WEISS, L.Firm size and profitability. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1967, 49, 319-331.
11.
HALL, R. H.Organizations: Structure and process. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
12.
HALL, R. H., HAAS, J. E., & JOHNSON, N. J.Organizational size, complexity, and formalization. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32, 903-912.
13.
HARRIS, R., & SOLLY, H.A survey of large companies. London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1959.
14.
HAYNES, R. H., & WHEELWRIGHT, S. G.The dynamics of process-product life cycles. Harvard Business Review, 1979, 57, 127-136.
15.
HERENDEEN, J. B.The economics of the corporate economy. New York: Dunellen Publishing Company, 1975.
16.
INGHAM, G. K.Size of Industrial Organization and Work Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
17.
KIMBERLY, J. R.Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 571-597.
18.
MARCUS, M.Profitability and size of firm: Some further evidence."The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1967, 51, 104-107.
19.
MELTZER, L., & SALTER, J.Organizational structure and the performance and job satisfaction of physiologists. American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 351-362.
20.
MILETI, D. S., GILLESPIE, D. F., & HAAS, J. E.Size and structure in complex organizations. Social Forces, 1977, 56, 208-217.
21.
PUGH, D. S., HICKSON, D. J.HININGS, C. R., & TURNER, C.The context of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14, 91-114.
22.
SAMUELS, J. M., & SMYTH, D. J.Profits, variability of profits, and size of firms. Economica, 1968, 35, 127-139.
23.
SCHERER, F. M.Industrial market structure and economic performance. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1970.
24.
SHALIT, S. S., & SANKAR, U.The measurement of firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1977, 59, 240-298.
25.
STANDARD AND POOR'S COMPUSTAT SERVICES, INC.Compustat. New York, 1979.
26.
STEKLER, H. O.Profitability and size of firm. Berkeley: University of California, 1963.
27.
STEKLER, H. O.The variability of profitability with size of firm, 1947-1958. American Statistical Association Journal, 1964, 59, 1183-1193.
28.
WHEELWRIGHT, S. S.Strategic planning in the small business. Business Horizons, 1971, 14, 51-58.
